Monday, December 24, 2007

Generation Y

http://www.desdecuba.com/generationy/
Generation Y
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Generatión Y is a Blog inspired by people like me, with names that start or contain a "Y". Born in the Cuba of the 70s and the 80s, marked by the "schools to the countryside", the Russian cartoons, the illegal exits and the frustration. So, an invitation goes especially to Yanisleidi, Yoandri, Yusimí, Yuniesky and others that drag their Ys, to read me and write back.


You too, Carlos?
12 de Diciembre, 2007



We spent Tuesday between the phone ringing and friends coming over to tell us that Carlos Otero -the best know pressenter in Cuban TV- had asked for assilum in the United States. This has been the news that has circulated the fastest “vox populis” in the last few months, maybe because it was about a Media man. He had got to be the only one who, in our sleepy programming, had a space with his own name: “Carlos y punto”.

Used as I am to see leave each year some of my friends, I am not
surprised that this “man of success” had chosen the way to exile. His decision looks like that of many that have understood that here they have no future, that have come to realize that Cuba is not a country where were dreams can come true. I confirm this every time I ask between my acquaintances about their plans and I receive -more than half the times- the phrase “what I want is to leave”. This answer grows alarmingly when we ask those of younger age.

This continuous bleeding that every month takes away the youngest, the boldest and, why not say it, the most talented, is a proof that the wellbeing of the people is not the center of attention of the Cuban government. Political and ideological elements, and loads carried from the past are prioritized above the “here” and “now” of our needs. While “up there” they don’t recognize that they haven’t been able to build a country where people want to stay and use their energies, the problem of emigration will not be solved.

How many will have to leave so that we can hear the phrase “we
failed”, we haven’t been able to give a future to Cubans. I suspect -because I know how hard head that comes with too many years in power- that not even the desolated stamp of an island of people aged and tired, with their sons living in other latitudes, will make the Cuban government come to reason. I imagine the accusations of “sold to imperialism” and “traitor” that will be heard these days in the Institute of Radio and Television, while talking about the exiled pressenter.

They don’t know that with the exit of Carlos Otero, those who stay here, feel the island increasingly empty and terribly boring.

Clasificado bajo: General 5 comentarios »


Coming out of the closet
12 de Diciembre, 2007



My friend Miguel, gay and dissident, feels hope with the new measures pushed by Mariela Castro, that will allow him access to sex change surgery. He dreams with having an I.D. card with an identity that is “She” and not “He” and with been treated as the woman he feels to be. He knows, however, that he’ll have to wait a lot longer to affiliate legally to a social-democratic party, to demonstrate in a picket for his labor rights or to vote -in direct elections- for another president.

With his new name, which for years is decided to be Olivia, he’ll not get rid completely from intolerance. Maybe he’ll get to be accepted in his differences, as long as this is about his “sexual preference” and not of ideological tendency. Coming out of the closet of his political opinions will take him time and they will remind him, at its due time, that this Revolution has allowed him the dream of his transexuality.

I can’t understand completely how we can invoke a tolerance which is isolated and not concluded. How can we be in the cutting edge in the subject of gay marriage and not allow -on the other hand- that we “marry” another political tendency or social doctrine. All of the thousands of Cubans locked in their closets of double morality, repressing their true opinions -as if they were an effeminate gesture- are waiting for a Mariela Castro to publicly say: “These too we have to accept and tolerate in their difference”. Miguel will be then the social-democratic woman that he has always dreamed of being.

Clasificado bajo: General 1 comentario »


Of TV classes and other absurdities
12 de Diciembre, 2007



Teo -that’s my son’s name- doesn’t belong to “Generation Y”, and nonetheless is an unlimited source of anecdotes for this Blog. His school stories give me smiles, concerns and one or other post (which he’s never interested in reading, because is “old people stuff”). Being up to date with what they say in his classroom, the music that he dances to, and the words that he invents connects me with those teenagers that some day will blame us for “this” which we are leaving to them.

A few weeks ago, my son came home with a Geography homework. “What are the portions in which Central America is divided?”, said the question, which got us to search in our memories and the dictionaries. I attempted to explain to Teo that in my time in high school, they used some other categories like “zones” or “areas” or “ecosystems”, but no this definition that reminded more of a piece of a pie than a stretch of land. So I inquired with him about the origin of such a novel category and I got as an answer: “They said it in the TV class”.

For those not up to date with the “new educational methods” of the Cuban medium education, I must explain that TV set in each classroom plays the role of teacher 60% of the school time. The youths get bored, can’t say “teacher, please repeat, I didn’t understand”, and copy without pause whatever they dictate in the screen. With this new pedagogic technique they attempt to alleviate the lack of teachers, caused by low salaries and little social or institutional recognition.

With the doubt of the “portions”, I went to school and asked a teacher (the flesh and blood one, not the virtual one in the screen) what meant that new geographic definition. I heard something familiar: “Ah, I don’t know, they said that in the TV classes”. So I decided to seat every morning to listen and take notes from the educational programs transmitted by TV. If I don’t do it, I won’t be able to review and evaluate Teo’s questions.

Into the role already of interpreting for my son the boring chit-chat of the “TV teacher” I have even got a VHS tape. Tomorrow I will start recording the TV classes!

Clasificado bajo: General Sin comentarios »


Under construction
10 de Diciembre, 2007



Friends, as you will realize, I have just changed some things in the Blog. Amongst the most important of new functionalities, is the possibility of leaving comments.

Little by little, I’ll have to remake the archive of previous posts, so I ask you for patience.

Clasificado bajo: General Sin comentarios »


Open up!
10 de Diciembre, 2007



Here I leave you this picture from last Saturday at the entrance to the Acapulco Cinema, to see the film “The Life of others”. I think that it has been the biggest mob seen in that festival. Those of us outside were yelling “Open up!”, after seeing that they were closing the doors, in reaction to the stampede that wanted in. I imagine that such scream was not limited to pass the entrance to the Acapulco Cinema, but it was a call to “Opening” with capital letters. I yelled it, also, thinking about the dams, the limits and the borders that have to yield and let us through.

Open up! We yelled outside the cinema and one hour later we could hear the character in the film saying “the wall has fallen”. “Open up!” -we said with faces against the glass, while we were pushed back-. “Open up!” -we continued thinking, even when we were already in the comfy chairs, the lights about to go off. “Open up!” -They were the words that I kept from that night, and I repeated them the next morning.

So, the movie, renamed here “Our lives”, allowed us to yell openly, right in the middle of 26th st, a verb that concentrates all of our desires: “Open up!”.

Clasificado bajo: General Sin comentarios »


Those who don’t show their faces
7 de Diciembre, 2007



The film “The life of the others”, which will be shown on December 8th in the Acapulco Cinema, will put before the Cuban public scenes more than well known. The sample of German cinema, organized into the Festival of the New Latin-American Cinema, will bring us a story that could well be that of a neighbor, a friend or our own. It will confirm that the sensation of feeling observed is not a paranoid delirium of our minds, but the clear evidence of a spying machinery that acts in the shadows.

Those who are able to get a seat, will be able to identify in the face and the attitude of Wiesler (the Stasi captain) the agent “Moises” or “Erick”, “Carlos” or Alejandro. They will understand that the business of interfering telephone lines, fill a house with microphones, or blackmail someone with their darkest perversions, are techniques of which the boys of the Ministry of the Interior have no copyright.

I learned, long time ago, that the best way to fool the “safetists” is to make public everything that one thinks. By signing with the name, while saying aloud the opinions, and by not hiding anything, we disarm their dark maneuvers of vigilance. Let’s save them, then, with our “guts in the air”, the long hours of listening to recordings, the undercover agents, the priceless gas of the cars in which they move and the long shifts searching in the Internet our divergent opinions.

Let’s know also the these -the ones from here- are not German. So from time to time they neglect their work in order to look the moving hips of a girl passing; they also loose the papers or fall asleep while watch us through our windows. Regardless of that, they are
similar to the Teutonic agents in their inability to show face, to tell their real names or to sign and publish all of what they say –to the ear- in the impunity of the shadows.

Clasificado bajo: General Sin comentarios »


The Venezuelan election
3 de Diciembre, 2007



When I went to bed past midnight, I already guessed that the NO option had won in Venezuela. How did I know? Because I’m used to read -with more attention- the omissions and the silences that the news themselves. So the little enthusiasm from the Cuban news media during Sunday, had already foretold me the results of the referendum in Venezuela

At six thirty in the morning today, the program “Buenos Dias” of Cuban television, gave a first news the message of the Minister of Health on the Day of the Medical Professionals. Shortly after, and obviating the journalism paradigms of “What, How and When”, they announced in the second headline that Chavez encouraged to continue deepening Socialism. -Ufff… The exercise took me a few seconds until finally I understood that the option of NO had won.

Even me, who have never taken part in a referendum and in most elections increase the number of the abstentions, understand the reach of the decision taken by the Venezuelan electorate. With their negative answer the Cubans have learned -it’s a shame that can’t apply it- that a simple monosyllabic word can be the dry stop that the authoritarians deserve. A brief word can stop the verbal incontinence of the politicians.

Today I’ll go out and try to insert in each phrase a “no”. I can already imagine the rain of understanding winks that will accompany each negation.

Clasificado bajo: General 1 comentario »


The other Havana
27 de Noviembre, 2007



There’s a city that happens besides us without touching us. It is a Havana that talks of “Parmesan cheese” of “lawn centimeters” and “weekends in Cancun”. It’s another town that barely mixes with ours and looks nothing like the scenario of landslides and lacking that forms our environment.

Both “Havanas” coexist and at the same time negate each other. Those who live into one can’t imagine -in all its extension- the other city that completes it. One happens rapidly over wheels, while ours ages in the stops, waiting for the bus. The sweet Havana of opulence displaces itself west, specially towards the Miramar zone, Cubanacan, Atabey and Jaimanitas. Mine, grows by jumps towards San Miguel, Diez de Octubre, El Calvario and Fontamar.

When both cities coincide and collide, they can’t comprehend each other: so far are the realities where they live. While one complains of its old Ikea furniture and of the difficulties in transporting the “moving container from the port”, the other one rocks in the aged chairs inherited from the grandparents and submerges in the black market.

My deteriorated Havana buys retail, talks softly and smells like sewage waters, while that city where ministers, high officials and diplomats dwell, moves amongst canapes, receptions, and exhales a delicate aroma of moisturizing creams. I prefer, however, the decrepit city that I haunt everyday, since at least it is coherent and transparent like what remains in it. I’ve made it to our image and likeness, or rather, we are the ones that imitate it in its resignation and its misery.

Clasificado bajo: General Sin comentarios »

The new Mathematics
27 de Noviembre, 2007



Cubans are preparing ourselves for the inflated number of GDP growth that will be announced at the end of the year. Without having swallowed -yet- the 12.5 that was publicized at the end of 2006, we are hallucinating with the big number that will be informed in December. (If this time we get to the uncomfortable “thirteen”, then indeed there will be material to feed a rain of jokes during 2008).

We are still trying to find evidence to back the surprising index of economic development from last year. I, particularly, have looked in my wallet, in the kitchen and especially in the refrigerator, but the economic progress doesn’t seem to show around there. Neither is in the network of services or commerce, where we suffer a decrease in the offerings and a noticeable hike in the prices. I don’t perceive it, even, in the limited boom in construction and even less in the depressed agricultural production. Just by visiting my hospital or entering the closest school I discard that it is in those areas where we can find the effects of the economic dynamism.

Without letting that stop me, I have oriented my search to the part of the basic product basket that is composed by the products of rationing. However, the inflated GDP doesn’t show its positive effects in that direction either. The same reduced quantities and the well known empty aisles remain in that subsidized market.

Where is the shining recovery that such economic index seems to show? What complicated method of calculation have the specialists used, so that we can’t verify it with our own reality? Something has happened to mathematics, and I’m afraid that this year the tricky abacus of triumphalism will again calculate our meager development.

Clasificado bajo: General Sin comentarios »

Kabbalah and Politics
20 de Noviembre, 2007



It is rumored that starting on January there will be a package of measures that would alleviate some of our daily difficulties. It was even predicted that there will be 17 or 25 new resolutions, amongst which are included the possibility of buying a car, opening a cell phone contract or traveling without the current exit permit. Such precise details shown in this street speculations barely surprise me, since desires get to project themselves frequently, with all of their complexities.

I don’t know if this rumors are part of another “lullaby” to keep us asleep for another three months, or if really something is cooking “upstairs”. Beforehand, I believe that if something is indeed announced in the first days of 2008, it won’t bring the structural changes that we need. The desired economic openings will come conditioned by ideological factors and the state property over the means of production will continue predominating in our economy.

The expected measures could only end all of our problems if they were discussed and approved by the majority of the people. As long as this doesn’t happen we’ll continue being “the mass”, to which it is necessary to “deliver guidance” without previous consultation. This current rumor, which the press and the media don’t reflect, is the palpable evidence that we are not the ones making the decisions. We are left, only, with the possibility of speculating.

Clasificado bajo: General 5 comentarios »

« Entradas anteriores


Yoani Sánchez (1975)

Licenciada en Filología.
Reside en La Habana y
combina su pasión por
la informática con su
trabajo en la
Revista Digital Consenso.
yoanisanchez@desdecuba.com


Archivos
Diciembre 2007
Noviembre 2007

Categorías
General (13)

Meta
Identificarse
XHTML válido
XFN
WordPress
--------------------------------------------------------
Generation Y está gestionado con WordPress Entradas (RSS) y Comentarios (RSS).

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

http://desdecuba.com/generaciony/
Generación Y
Generación Y es un Blog inspirado en gente como yo, con nombres que comienzan o contienen una "y griega". Nacidos en la Cuba de los años 70s y los 80s, marcados por las escuelas al campo, los muñequitos rusos, las salidas ilegales y la frustración. Así que invito especialmente a Yanisleidi, Yoandri, Yusimí, Yuniesky y otros que arrastran sus "y griegas" a que me lean y me escriban.

Versión al ingles


Una silla vacía
24 de Diciembre, 2007



Hoy voy a celebrar la noche buena con mi familia y mis amigos. Armaremos una improvisada mesa con las viejas puertas del ascensor y sobre ella una sábana hará las veces de mantel. Cada uno traerá algo para festejar. No tendremos las uvas, la sidra o el turrón, pero estaremos juntos y en armonía -lo cual es ya un lujazo-. Los niños tendrán su refresco garantizado, mientras que un roncito con limón o miel será el néctar para los adultos. Mi mamá contará lo complicado que fue comprar los tomates en la mañana y mi sobrina me recordará que el martes 25 actuará como angelito en la misa de su Parroquia.

A la cabeza de la mesa mantendremos una silla que permanece sin su ocupante desde la Navidad del 2003. Es el lugar de Adolfo Fernández Saínz –condenado en la Primavera Negra a quince años de prisión-. Será triste comprobar, por quinta vez, su ausencia. Si se lo permiten los carceleros, podremos escuchar su voz en el teléfono dándonos ánimo (¡Qué ironías tiene la vida! Él, que está en la cárcel, tiene fuerzas aún para infundar aliento).

Recuerdo el día en que le contamos a mi hijo que él estaba preso. Mi marido le dijo: “Teo, tu tío Adolfo está en la cárcel porque es un hombre muy valiente”, a lo que mi hijo respondió con su lógica infantil: “Entonces ustedes siguen libres porque son un poco cobardes”. ¡Qué manera más directa, de decir las verdades, tienen los niños! Sí, Teo, tienes razón: en esta Navidad calentamos aún nuestras sillas porque somos “cobardes”, deseamos en la intimidad de la familia un nuevo año de libertad, pues no logramos hacer de esos deseos una realidad. Nos conformamos con el mito de la fatalidad nacional, porque nos hemos dado por vencidos en el acto de cambiar las cosas.

La vacía silla de Adolfo será el territorio más libre de nuestra improvisada mesa navideña.

Clasificado bajo: General 9 comentarios »


Concierto para cerrar este agotado 2007
24 de Diciembre, 2007



Apretujados en el patio del Centro Pablo, hemos vuelto a escuchar a Pedro Luís Ferrer. La noche del sábado 22 de diciembre nos cayó encima mientras oíamos sus poemas y canciones, alegres de que estuviera aquí –de vuelta entre nosotros- el Gordo de la guitarra. Pedro ha llegado distinto y a la vez igualito. Tiene temas nuevos que nos transportan a las calles de Madrid y los intercala con sus conocidos acordes guajiros, sones y décimas.

La canción dedicada a su amigo Jesús Díaz donde confiesa que “si no me voy de Cuba, no entiendas que me quedo”, me confirmó en mi locura de permanecer aquí para “apagar la luz del Morro” (o para encenderla otra vez, ¿quién sabe?). Eso y mucho más le debo a este trovador, que después de siete meses en Europa llega ante su público –que ya tampoco es el mismo- y nos hace reír y lanzarnos miraditas cómplices con aquello de: “abuelo tiene un revolver y un cuchillo,/ y mientras no se lo quiten abuelo ofrece peligro (…)/ aunque pienses que no, dile que sí/ si lo contradices peor para ti”.

Pedro, tú has sido lo mejor de este aburrido y descolorido fin de año. Mucho más real que los tostones, que la yuca con mojo o que la limitada porción de carne de cerdo (sé que esta comparación te gustará, porque lo de goloso se nota en tus canciones y en tu talla). Tomaré, entonces, como propósito para este 2008 -que se nos viene encima- un par de versos tuyos: “tenemos que construir la democracia plena,/ que nadie me obligue a decir lo que no quiero”.

Los dejo con el texto de la canción que aparecía en el programa del concierto y que da título al mismo:
Canción de fin de añoAhora que permiten criticar:¡Qué bellos son tus ojos, vida mía!Me gusta tu manera de bailarY el fuero peculiar de tu alegría.

Ahora que permiten criticar:Me voy al Malecón y espero el día;Me quiero dedicar a descansar;Las flores del jardín son tan bonitas…

Ahora que permiten criticar:Estreno un pantalón y una camisa;Pusimos una hamaca en el portalY un timbre que parece campanita.

Ahora que hasta el mudo quiere hablarY está de moda el grito y la querella:Tus piernas, las quisiera devorar,El modo en que caminas y te sientas.

Ahora que permiten:La calle está repleta,Las bolas y los chistes,El cielo y las estrellas.
Ahora que permiten criticar:Compré un ordenador y una cazuela;Mi amigo preguntó para variar:La luna está redonda y placentera.

Pedro Luís Ferrer

Clasificado bajo: General Sin comentarios »


Sin pedigree
24 de Diciembre, 2007



Entre los centenares de mensajes que recibo cada semana hay ciertas preguntas y dudas que se repiten. A muchos les intriga “¿para quién trabajo?”, “¿de quién soy hija?” o “¿quién me paga por hacer esto? Sin intentar convencer a nadie (porque eso de exponer “mi verdad” es lo que más recuerda a un mea culpa) quiero aclarar algunas cosas:


- Nací en un solar de Centro Habana, en una de las esquinas de mi calle
decía “Jesús Peregrino” y en la otra “Jesús Pelegrino” (de manera que desde niña
he aprendido a convivir con la multiplicidad de formas con las que se puede
nombrar a una misma cosa).
- No tengo ningún pedigree familiar que me avale para nada, como no sea la
habilidad para apretar tuercas y reparar equipos eléctricos heredada de mi
padre, maquinista de trenes que en la crisis de los noventa cambió su uniforme
azul y blanco por un puesto de ponchero de bicicletas.
- Muchos de los que me conocen creen que tengo “guayabitos en la azotea”,
“me falta un tornillo” o “estoy ida del coco”. Todo lo que he hecho en esta
vidita (meterme en problemas, escribir una tesis sobre la literatura de la
dictadura en Latinoamérica, unir mi vida a un periodista en desgracia, regresar
a mi país y postear en este Blog) bien podría ser visto por un especialista como
manifestaciones de un desorden psiquiátrico. Todo es posible…
- A los que afirman –bajo la impunidad de un seudónimo- que soy del G2,
quiero aclararles que muy pocos en Cuba lo siguen llamando así. Ahora le decimos
“la seguridá”, “el Aparato”, “la maquinaria”, “el Armagedón”, “la trituradora”,
“los muchachos” o solamente “ellos”. Si alguien le preguntara a un joven “Oye
¿tú sabes qué cosa es el G2?” quizás respondería que se trata de un grupo de
Rock o de una marca de zapatos.
- No pienso dar ninguna prueba que niegue esas acusaciones de “infiltrada”.
A los que les alivia y les quita la culpa creer que “me atrevo porque estoy
protegida o que me han mandado a decir todo esto”, pues adelante. Cada cual –al
menos en el pequeño espacio de este Blog- puede pensar y comentar lo que
quiera.
- En relación con el dinero, la base material o el salario, me gusta citar
a mi marido cuando dice que tengo “alma de fakir”. Me visto con lo que aparezca,
hace años que no tengo más que un par de zapatos y como una vez al día. Una sola
obsesión de “consumo” recorre ahora mi vida: postear. El dinero que me gano
traduciendo del alemán, enseñándole la Habana a un par de turistas o vendiendo
mis viejos libros de la universidad, lo invierto –cuando puedo- en pagar media
hora de Internet. Por eso mis apariciones en “Generación Y” son a saltos y no
con la frecuencia de una bitácora.
- ¿Por qué yo tengo un Blog y otros no? Porque soy de una generación que ha
aprendido a moverse en el mundo de la tecnología, incluso teniendo que armar su
propio PC con piezas compradas en el mercado negro. Una de las contradicciones
que se está dando en la Cuba de hoy, es que los que tienen cosas más
interesantes que contar, son en su mayoría analfabetos informáticos. O sea, que
los asiduos lectores de blogs tienen que conformarse con gente como yo, sin
pedigree, pero para quien el mouse es una prolongación del propio cuerpo.


Clasificado bajo: General 8 comentarios »


De tele-clases y otros absurdos
12 de Diciembre, 2007



Teo –que así se llama mi hijo- no pertenece a la “Generación Y”, no obstante es fuente ilimitada de anécdotas para este Blog. Sus historias escolares me generan sonrisas, preocupaciones y algún que otro post (que nunca le interesa leer porque eso es “cosa de viejos”). Estar al tanto de lo que se dice en su aula, de la música que baila y de las palabras que inventa me conecta con esos adolescentes que algún día nos echarán en cara “esto” que les estamos legando.

Hace un par de semanas mi hijo llegó a casa con una tarea de Geografía. “¿Cuáles son las porciones en las que está dividida América Central?” decía la pregunta, que nos puso a indagar en la memoria y en los diccionarios. Intenté explicarle a Teo que en mi época de la secundaria, se utilizaban otras categorías como “zonas”, “áreas” o “ecosistemas”, pero no esta definición que más bien recordaba a un trozo de pastel que a una franja de territorio. De manera que lo interrogué sobre el origen de tan novedosa categoría y obtuve como respuesta: “Eso lo dijeron en la tele-clase”.

Para aquellos que no están muy actualizados en los “nuevos métodos educativos” de la enseñanza media cubana, debo explicarles que un televisor -en cada aula- hace las veces de profesor alrededor del 60 % del horario docente. Los jóvenes se aburren, no pueden decir “Profe, repita que no entendí” y copian sin parar lo que les dictan desde la pantalla. Con esa nueva técnica pedagógica se intenta paliar la crisis de maestros, motivada por los bajos salarios y el poco reconocimiento social e institucional.

Con la duda de “las porciones” me fui hacia la escuela y le pregunté al profesor (al de carne y hueso, no al virtual de la pantalla) qué significaba aquella nueva definición geográfica. Escuché entonces algo conocido: “Ah, no sé, eso lo dijeron en las tele-clases”. De manera que he decidido sentarme cada mañana a escuchar y tomar nota de los programas educativos transmitidos por la televisión. Si no lo hago así, cómo podré ayudar a repasar y evacuar las interrogantes de Teo.

Metida ya en el rol de interpretar para mi hijo la aburrida perorata del “profe televisivo” he conseguido hasta un cassette VHS. ¡Mañana mismo, comenzaré a grabar las tele-clases!

Clasificado bajo: General 43 comentarios »


Salir del armario
12 de Diciembre, 2007



Mi amigo Miguel, gay y contestatario, se siente esperanzado con las nuevas medidas impulsadas por Mariela Castro, que le permitirán acceder a una cirugía de cambio de sexo. Sueña con tener un carné de identidad que diga que es “ella” y no “él” y con ser tratado como la mujer que se siente. Sabe, sin embargo, que tendrá que esperar mucho más para afiliarse legalmente a un partido socialdemócrata, para manifestarse con un cartel por sus derechos laborales o para votar -en elecciones directas- por otro presidente.

Con su nuevo nombre, que desde hace años tiene decidido que será Olivia, no se librará del todo de la intolerancia. Quizás llegue a ser aceptado en su diferencia, siempre que está sea “de preferencia sexual” y no de “tendencia ideológica”. Salir del armario de sus opiniones políticas le llevará más tiempo y le recordarán, en su debido momento, que esta Revolución le ha permitido el sueño de su transexualidad.

No entiendo muy bien como se puede convocar a la tolerancia parcelada e inconclusa. Cómo se puede estar a la avanzada en el tema de los matrimonios entre homosexuales y no permitir –por otro lado- que nos “casemos” con otra tendencia política o doctrina social. Todos los miles de cubanos encerrados en sus armarios de doble moral, reprimiéndose sus verdaderas opiniones –como si de un gesto afeminado se tratara- están esperando porque una Mariela Castro diga públicamente: “A estos también hay que aceptarlos y tolerarlos en su diferencia”. Miguel será entonces la mujer socialdemócrata que siempre ha soñado.

Clasificado bajo: General 12 comentarios »


¿Tú también, Carlos?
12 de Diciembre, 2007



El martes lo pasamos entre el teléfono que sonaba y los amigos que venían para contarnos que Carlos Otero -el más conocido presentador de la televisión cubana- había pedido asilo en Estados Unidos. Esta ha sido la noticia que más rápidamente ha circulado vox populi en los últimos meses, quizás por tratarse de un hombre de los medios. Había llegado a ser el único que, en nuestra somnífera programación, tenía un espacio con su propio nombre: “Carlos y punto”.

Acostumbrada como estoy a ver partir cada año a varios de mis amigos, no me sorprende que este “hombre de éxito” haya escogido el camino del exilio. Su decisión se parece a la de muchos otros que han comprendido que aquí no tienen futuro, que han llegado a darse cuenta que Cuba no es un país donde realizar los sueños. Eso lo confirmo cada vez que pregunto entre mis conocidos sobre sus planes y recibo -más de la mitad de la veces- la frase “yo lo que quiero es irme de aquí”. Respuesta ésta que aumenta alarmantemente cuando se interroga a los de menos edad.
Esta continúa sangría que cada mes se lleva a los más jóvenes, a los más atrevidos y, por qué no decirlo, a los más talentosos, es la demostración de que el bienestar de la población no está siendo el centro de atención del gobierno cubano. Elementos políticos, ideológicos y cargas arrastradas del pasado son priorizadas por encima del “aquí” y el “ahora” de nuestras necesidades. Mientras por “allá arriba” no se reconozca que no han logrado construir un país donde la gente quiera quedarse y emplear sus energías, no podrá resolverse el drama de la emigración.

Cuántos tendrán que irse para que escuchemos la frase de “hemos fracasado, no hemos podido darle un futuro a los cubanos”. Sospecho -porque ya conozco la testarudez que trae tantos años en el poder- que ni siquiera la desolada estampa de una isla de gente envejecida y cansada, con sus hijos viviendo en otras latitudes, hará entrar en razón al gobierno cubano. Me imagino las acusaciones de “apátrida”, “vendido al imperialismo” y “traidor” que se escucharán por estos días, en el Instituto de Radio y Televisión, al hablar del asilado presentador.

No saben ellos que con la salida de Carlos Otero, los que quedamos aquí, sentimos la isla cada vez más vacía y terriblemente aburrida.

Clasificado bajo: General 37 comentarios »


En reparaciones
10 de Diciembre, 2007



Amigos, como se darán cuenta acabo de cambiar algunas cosas en el Blog. Entre las más importantes, de las nuevas funcionalidades, está la posibilidad de dejar comentarios.
Poco a poco, tendré que rehacer el archivo de los post anteriores, así que les pido paciencia.
Clasificado bajo: General 49 comentarios »


¡Abran!
10 de Diciembre, 2007



Aquí les dejo esta foto del pasado sábado a la entrada del cine Acapulco para ver el filme “La vida de los otros”. Creo que ha sido la “molotera” más grande que se ha visto en este Festival.
Los que estábamos afuera gritamos ¡Abran!, al ver que cerraban las puertas ante la avalancha descontrolada que quería entrar. Intuyo que aquel grito no se reducía a pasar el umbral del cine Acapulco, sino que era un llamado a la “Apertura” con mayúsculas. Yo lo grité, también, pensando en los diques, los límites y las fronteras que tienen que ceder y dejarnos pasar.

¡Abran! Gritamos fuera del cine y una hora después oíamos a un personaje del filme decir “El muro se cayó”. ¡Abran! Dijimos con las caras pegadas al cristal, mientras nos empujaban desde atrás ¡Abran! Seguimos pensando aún cuando ya estábamos en las mullidas butacas, a punto de apagarse las luces. ¡Abran! Fue la palabra que me quedó de esa noche y la que repetí al otro día en la mañana.

De manera que la película, rebautizada aquí como “La vida de nosotros” nos permitió gritar a viva voz, en plena calle 26, un verbo que concentra todos nuestros deseos: ¡Abran!

Clasificado bajo: General 41 comentarios »


Los que no dan la cara
7 de Diciembre, 2007



El filme “La vida de los otros” que se proyectará el 8 de diciembre en el Cine Acapulco, pondrá ante el público cubano escenas más que conocidas. La muestra de cine alemán, organizada dentro del Festival del Nuevo Cine Latinoamericano, nos traerá una historia que bien podría ser la de un vecino, la de un amigo o la nuestra propia. Nos confirmará que la sensación de sentirnos observados no es un delirio paranoico de nuestras mentes, sino la clara evidencia de un aparato de espionaje que actúa en las sombras.

Aquellos que logren atrapar una butaca, podrán identificar en el rostro y la actitud de Wiesler (el capitán de la Stasi) al agente “Moisés”, a “Erick”, “Carlos” o “Alejandro”. Comprenderán que eso de intervenir las líneas telefónicas, llenar de micrófonos una vivienda o chantajear a alguien con sus más oscuras perversiones, son técnicas de las que los inquietos muchachos del Ministerio del Interior, no tienen el copyright.

Aprendí, hace tiempo, que la mejor forma de burlar a los “segurosos” es hacer público todo lo que uno piensa. Al firmar con el nombre, al decir por lo alto las opiniones y al no esconder nada, les desarmamos sus oscuras maniobras de vigilancia. Ahorrémosles pues, con nuestras “vísceras al aire”, las largas horas de escuchar grabaciones, los agentes encubiertos, la preciada gasolina de los autos en los que se mueven y las maratónicas jornadas buscando en Internet nuestras opiniones divergentes.

Sepamos también que “estos” -los de aquí- no son “alemanes”. Así que de vez en cuando descuidan su trabajo para mirar las cimbreantes caderas de una joven que pasa; se les pierden los papeles o se quedan dormidos mientras atisban por nuestras ventanas. No obstante, se parecen a los agentes teutones en su incapacidad para dar la cara, para decir sus verdaderos nombres o para firmar y publicar todo aquello que nos dicen –al oído- en la impunidad de la penumbra.

Clasificado bajo: General 7 comentarios »


La e-Lección de Venezuela
3 de Diciembre, 2007



Cuando me acosté pasada la medianoche, ya intuía que en Venezuela había ganado la opción del NO. ¿Cómo lo sabía? Porque estoy acostumbrada a leer –con más atención- las omisiones y los silencios que las propias noticias. De manera que el poco entusiasmo de los medios informativos cubanos, durante el domingo, ya me había adelantado los resultados del referéndum venezolano.

A las seis y treinta de la mañana de hoy, el programa “Buenos Días” de la televisión cubana, dio como primera noticia el mensaje del ministro de Salud Pública por el día del Médico. Poco después y obviando los paradigmas periodísticos de “el qué, el cómo y el cuándo” nos anunciaron, en el segundo titular, que Chávez exhortaba a continuar profundizando el Socialismo. Ufff… el ejercicio de extraer la información de tan sofisticada elipsis, me llevó algunos segundos hasta que finalmente comprendí que el NO se había impuesto.

Incluso yo, que nunca he participado en un referéndum y que en la mayoría de las votaciones engroso el número de las abstenciones, comprendo la envergadura de la decisión tomada por el electorado venezolano. Con su negativa los cubanos hemos aprendido –lástima que no podamos aplicarlo- que un simple monosílabo puede ser la parada en seco que se merecen los autoritarios. Una breve palabra puede detener la incontinencia verbal de los políticos.

Hoy saldré a la calle y probaré a intercalar en cada frase un “no”. Ya me imagino el aluvión de guiños cómplices que acompañará a cada negativa.

Clasificado bajo: General 8 comentarios »

« Entradas anteriores


Yoani Sánchez (1975)
Licenciada en Filología.
Reside en La Habana y
combina su pasión por
la informática con su
trabajo en la
Revista Digital Consenso.
yoanisanchez@desdecuba.com

Archivos
Diciembre 2007
Noviembre 2007
Octubre 2007
Septiembre 2007
Agosto 2007
Julio 2007
Junio 2007
Mayo 2007

Categorías
General (60)
Enlaces
Bar Habana
Bitácora cubana
Blog de Emilio Ichikawa
Blog de Enrisco
Blog de Tania Quintero
Cuaderno de Cuba
Cubanistica
Cubista Magazine
Desde aquí
El archivo de Connie
Epepeh
Havanascity
La Habana elegante
La nueva Cuba
Luces y sombras
Mi isla al mediodía
Misceláneas de Cuba
Pavontales
Penúltimos días
Por la izquierda
Revista Digital Consenso
Yayabo

Meta
Identificarse
XHTML válido
XFN
WordPress
Generación Y está gestionado con WordPress Entradas (RSS) y Comentarios (RSS).

Sunday, December 23, 2007

CB9 Confronts Politicians Following Expansion Approval


CB9 Confronts Politicians Following Expansion Approval
By Daniel Amzallag
PUBLISHED DECEMBER 23

A Community Board 9 meeting was especially heated Thursday night, as board members and neighborhood residents confronted elected officials in light of Columbia’s recently-approved Manhattanville expansion plan.

The meeting followed a City Council vote on Wednesday in which the Council came down in favor of the plan to rezone 36 acres of Manhattanville, an action that will enable the University to build a 17-acre campus. As part of the mandatory public review process, CB9 voted on the plan and rejected it almost unanimously.

Many board members have served as voices of opposition throughout the entire review process, questioning aspects of Columbia’s plan and harshly criticizing the West Harlem Local Development Corporation, a body of neighborhood representatives selected to negotiate a community benefits agreement with Columbia. On Wednesday morning, the LDC and Columbia signed a memorandum of understanding for a community benefits agreement of $150 million after nearly a year of negotiations.

At Thursday’s meeting, attendees expressed frustration with the LDC’s alleged lack of responsiveness to the community at large. CB9 member Norma Ramos said the LDC has not sufficiently presented information to the community, adding that because of its inaction, “Columbia has basically gotten everything that they wanted and are doing so with paying very little to the community.”

But incoming CB9 chair and LDC officer Pat Jones said election to the LDC is “a very public process,” and members have to report to their constituent groups. “At just sheer dollars, I don’t think that’s necessarily the barometer or the sole barometer—it’s the results of whatever you do,” she said.

City Councilman Robert Jackson, D-Manhattanville and Washington Heights, stood by his vote in favor of Columbia’s plan, saying he believes it to be in the community’s best interests. “You have a right not to vote for me and not to elect me—if you don’t like how your elected representatives represent you, vote them out of office,” he said.

Jackson faced criticism from board member Walter South and local resident Tom DeMott, CC ’80 and leader of the anti-expansion Coalition to Preserve Community. They accused Jackson of “pre-selling” his Council vote by helping negotiate the community benefits agreement Wednesday morning before he voted.

Jackson responded that he “was trying to assist wherever I could to resolve an outstanding issue,” rather than participating in the negotiations. Jackson’s chief of staff, Susan Russell, is an officer of the LDC.

Nellie Bailey, local resident and a member of the CPC, said Jackson had been “deliberately misleading” in justifying a Wednesday City Council vote, which many have said was rushed.
Jackson responded to these concerns Wednesday, saying that the expansion process had been going on for years. “You attempted to confuse that the vote had to take place with other processes that others were not talking about,” Bailey said.

“People wanted to wrap up business before the winter break, and it was ready to happen, and it did happen,” Jackson responded, adding that there had never been guarantee that the vote would take place Wednesday.

Manhattan Borough President Scott Stringer, who voted in favor of Columbia’s 197-c rezoning plan as part of the review process, also spoke at the meeting. He said his goal “has always been that “Columbia coexists with the community without overrunning it.”

Bailey questioned Stringer as to his allegedly inconsistent statements regarding the use of eminent domain in Columbia’s expansion, allegations which Stringer denied.

Stringer and Jackson were met with applause as well as loud but isolated boos and shouts as they were each introduced to speak to the crowd. Local resident Michael Henry Adams, also a Harlem historian, shouted, “Sellout! Uncle Tom sellout!” as they spoke. CB9 District Manager Lawrence McClean asked Adams to leave the meeting, and upon refusal threatened him with arrest by two on duty police officers. Adams was allowed to stay after a ten minute altercation, though he left before the meeting ended.

“Take your medication,” Stringer said to Adams’ out-of-turn shouts that Stringer was “destroying this city” and “destroying our community.”

But the hostility towards elected officials is not shared by all members of the community, Jones said. “It’s one of those cases where you’ve got very vocal passionate individuals, and you’ve got a silent majority out there,” she said. “There was some very obnoxious behavior, but if you did a count, the majority of people did not have that response or reaction.”

“It’s disgusting,” outgoing CB9 chair Jordi Reyes-Montblanc said of several members’ behavior. “The disrespect doesn’t touch Robert Jackson or Scott Stringer—the disrespect is to me, and that offends me, and I cannot allow it.”

At the end of Thursday's meeting, the board held elections for next year's officers. Jones was unanimously elected next year's chair. Assistant treasurer Yvonne Stennett will be next year's 2nd vice chair, and board member Anthony Fletcher will be next year's treasurer. 1st vice chair Carolyn Thompson and secretary Theodore Kovaleff will keep their positions next year.


View Comments ( 2)Post a Comment

I could not agree more with the previous comments. As a member of the silent community supporting Columbia's plans (with personal reservations about eminent domain and a desire to see more affordable housing within the expansion) the disrespect and bullying by the "opposition" caused me to stop attending public meetings and submit written testimony instead.
The constant disruptions and frequent misinformation on the part of the CPC and its supporters was less respectful (and legitimate) opposition and more fascist bullying by self-appointed "leaders" of the community.
Posted by: anonymous (not verified) December 24th, 2007 @ 10:52am

reply

look at the way they make a mockery of the meetings with no discipline and irrational statements. How can we take these activists seriously when they act like hooligans and cannot work in a respectful manner.

Posted by: anonymous (not verified) December 24th, 2007 @ 3:48am
reply
Two points of clarification:
1. I ordered the District Manager to call the Police and remove Mr. Adams after he had been strongly advised to behave. Mr. Adams is a talented historian but a boorish twit that can be very disruptive and has a history of such behaviour. CM Jackson and MBP Stringer asked me not to do it, but I did and was about to have him arrested when a number of Board Members asked me not to do that in order to avoid Mr. Adams further embrarrasment and I agreed not to have him arrested provided he behaved and be quiet, which he did. Other hecklers paid attention to my instructions for quiet and were not in any way threatened with arrest.
2. I welcome dissent, I am a dissidenter; but there is no need to become offensive and call insulting names to any one.
As Chairman I am responsible for the proper conduct of any meeting and the disrespect is much more towards the chairman when the public ignores and defies the Chair's directions, and that will never happen at a CB9M meeting ever again I swore after the infamous Dinkins shout-down.

J. Reyes-Montblanc, Chairman
Community Board 9 Manhattan

Posted by: anonymous (not verified) December 24th, 2007 @ 11:51am
reply

Saturday, December 22, 2007

Columbia expansion forges ahead, despite opposition

crain'snewyorkbusiness.com

Columbia expansion forges ahead, despite opposition
Project will put school, area on new path; eminent domain still issue
December 22. 2007 11:47AM
By: Judith Messina


The City Council's approval this month of Columbia University's $6 billion plan to extend its campus—and remake a large swath of West Harlem in the process—marked what many hope will usher in a new era of prominence for the university and a renaissance for the Manhattanville neighborhood.

Over roughly two decades, Columbia will put up 16 to 18 buildings, including dormitories, classrooms, research labs and performing arts spaces. The venture is expected to create about 6,000 jobs and transform a shabby enclave of auto repair shops, warehouses and small manufacturing plants into a pedestrian-friendly environment with more open space, restaurants and shops.

Competitive footing

The school hopes the expansion will put the chronically cramped institution on an equal footing with universities such as Harvard and Princeton in the competition for students, faculty and research dollars.

Columbia argues that its growth is critical to the city as well as to the university.

"Is New York going to continue to be the capital not just of business and finance, but also of ideas and science and medical leadership?" asks Columbia Executive Vice President David Stone.

The plan has been the fulcrum of an extended battle between Columbia and Manhattanville—a battle containing racial and class overtones. The community fears that the university's expansion will overwhelm it and spark a wave of gentrification that will force out artists and manufacturers, and make rents unaffordable. Looming over the project is the possibility that Columbia will seek to have the state exercise its right of eminent domain for the remaining commercial properties needed to realize the school's vision. Opponents argue that for the state to do so would constitute a misuse of eminent domain.

Benefits agreement

To mollify the community and help mend the historically contentious relationship, Columbia has offered a benefits agreement that includes $20 million for affordable housing and $30 million for grade-school education. The university also opened a math and science public high school in September.

Foes of the expansion acknowledge that the project is important for New York.

"There will certainly be a benefit to the city as a whole," says Brad Lander, director of the Pratt Center for Community Development, which advised local Community Board 9 on its own plan for the neighborhood. "It will be good for more people than it is today, but it's a different set of people. Will it be better or worse for the people who live nearby? It will be much less theirs, and there will be fewer decent job opportunities for them."

http://www.crainsnewyork.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20071223/FREE/303249700/1010/toc

Friday, December 21, 2007

For a Top-Tier University, There’s Now Room to Get Even Better


N.Y. / Region

For a Top-Tier University, There’s Now Room to Get Even Better

By KAREN W. ARENSON
Published: December 21, 2007

As Columbia University officials doggedly pursued their plan to acquire 17 acres a few blocks north of their main campus in Manhattan, they often pulled out a chart showing their pint-size 36-acre campus stacked up against those of competitors like Harvard, Princeton and Yale, whose campuses are measured in the hundreds of acres.

Skip to next paragraph
Related
Despite Earlier Defiance, Holdouts in Columbia’s Expansion Zone Are Down to 3
(December 21, 2007)
EDUCATION: Columbia Expansion Gets Green Light (December 20, 2007)

The New York City Council’s approval of a rezoning plan Wednesday that clears the way for the expansion in Manhattanville, in Harlem, will still not put Columbia into the big leagues on space. But Lee C. Bollinger, Columbia’s president, says it will give the space-starved university enough room to hold its own for decades to come in an increasingly competitive arena.

“The key to preserving and enhancing Columbia’s greatness is space,” Mr. Bollinger said on Thursday. “It’s always space and resources. But in this case, space was critical.”

He added that while the university had used space deftly — and would probably rank highest if universities were judged on creativity per square foot — it had pretty much reached the limit.

In critical rankings like research dollars received from the National Institutes of Health, for example, Columbia slipped because it did not have enough laboratory space to bring in more researchers, officials said. The business school set up offices in Midtown.

“It has been a tremendous inhibition for scientific research particularly, but also for virtually every area,” said Alan Brinkley, Columbia’s provost. “Many departments we
re at a point where the simple absence of offices made it impossible to hire.”
“That is still true,” Dr. Brinkley added. “It will be years before the space in Manhattanville opens up. But this gives us the ability to envision a very different future.”
Columbia has already purchased or has contracts to buy many of the properties in the area that it plans to move into, and is negotiating with the owners of other properties. The possibility that it will seek help from the government in acquiring some property through eminent domain remains on the table.

But even as the university waited for zoning approval, it hired planners and architects to begin sketching ideas. The Italian architect Renzo Piano will provide the overall design for the first buildings, which will include the business school, the arts school, the School of International and Public Affairs and a science center to study mind, brain and behavior.

“What gets unleashed now is the energy to complete the academic planning among faculty, the architects’ work on the design, and the engineers’ work on implementation,” said Robert Kasdin, senior executive vice president at Columbia.

He said he anticipated that Columbia would begin demolition by next summer.

Mr. Kasdin and Mr. Bollinger said they hoped that some buildings would be completed in four to five years. By 2015, they plan to have added about 1.5 million square feet of usable space. As schools and departments move north from the Morningside Heights campus, that will free up space on the main campus, particularly for the arts and sciences.

The new acreage will have a very different feel from Columbia’s neo-Classical main campus, designed more than a century ago by McKim, Mead & White and set around a quadrangle.

The new campus will not have a quadrangle or gates, but will be more integrated into the community, the university says, with coffee shops and stores along the sidewalks of 125th Street. It will be akin to New York University’s core campus, but with an overarching design.

Mr. Bollinger said the prospect of new space had already helped revitalize the university’s fund-raising. He said that after Stanford and Harvard, Columbia raised more money last year than any other university in the competitive “Ivy plus” group, which includes the Ivy League and several other selective universities.

Columbia officials say their expansion will also create opportunities for the community, some defined through negotiations with the West Harlem Local Development Corporation and some that the university simply wants to pursue.

Maxine Griffith, Columbia’s executive vice president for government and community affairs, said one call she received on Thursday was from a neighborhood resident who said:
“Congratulations. Now you’ve got to keep your promises.”
She said Columbia planned to do just that.

Next Article in New York Region (8 of 29) »

http://www.nytimes.com/2007/12/21/nyregion/21expansion.html

Columbia vote (35-5-6) vs. AY vote (4-0), newspaper coverage, and the value left in ULURP

Atlantic Yards Report
This watchdog blog offers analysis, commentary, and reportage about Forest City Ratner's planned $4 billion Atlantic Yards project, the largest ever in Brooklyn, to build a basketball arena plus at least 16 high-rise buildings. It follows up on my 9/1/05 report on New York Times coverage of the project and the TimesRatnerReport blog (links below). [Note that some posts are truncated: be sure to click "Read the full post."]

Friday, December 21, 2007

Columbia vote (35-5-6) vs. AY vote (4-0), newspaper coverage, and the value left in ULURP

What a difference the city's Uniform Land Use Review Procedure (ULURP) makes, at least in terms of public awareness. The City Council's contentious approval of Columbia University's West Harlem development plan merited front-page, above-the-fold coverage in the New York Times yesterday (albeit attached to graphics regarding Governor's Island plans; click to enlarge), as the vote was 35-5, with 6 abstentions. (Gotham Gazette called it divisive, and highlighted those not toeing the line.)

By contrast, on 12/6/06, when the Empire State Development Corporation board voted 4-0 to approve the Atlantic Yards project after perfunctory and uninformed discussion, the Times placed the article, headlined A Nod for Atlantic Yards, and Then a Lawsuit, on page 3 of the Metro section. The ESDC meeting lasted 15 minutes; the City Council hearing Wednesday elapsed over five hours, including breaks.

There wasn't any contentiousness; as I noted, the press release had already been prepared when the 3:30 pm board meeting began. Still, as an example of how business gets done in New York, it was worth a closer look, and the Times article, which did look skeptically at some statements by then-ESDC Chairman Charles Gargano, simply described the board meeting as "largely anticlimactic."

AY via ULURP?

Consider what might have occurred had the Atlantic Yards project gone through ULURP. It likely would have passed the City Council, thanks to the city's and Forest City Ratner's political muscle, but the criticism voiced by the three affected community boards would have gotten much more airing. And, at the City Council vote, critics like Council Members Letitia James and Charles Barron would have had a platform for their views.

An Atlantic Yards critic on the ESDC board might have flayed fellow board member Charles Dorkey for his uninformed question about the location of Atlantic Yards: “What are the cross streets for (Site) 5”). That critic might have said that it was time to start rather than conclude examination of the project.

And even if ULURP is a "complete sham," as Municipal Art Society Kent Barwick has said, it is superior to the ESDC process, not just because it provides a greater opportunity for a democratic vote but because, as shown yesterday, it provides more of a platform for public scrutiny. And Deputy Mayor Dan Doctoroff now acknowledges Atlantic Yards probably should've gone through ULURP.

PACB approval


When the three-member Public Authorities Control Board approved the project two weeks later, on 12/20/06, the Times did run the story on the front page the next day. (Here's No Land Grab on the anniversary.)

But the coverage, headlined State Approves Major Complex For Brooklyn, was about inside political maneuvering, and then outside reaction from project critics. The approval votes by Republican Gov. George Pataki, who owed little fealty to Brooklyn voters, and Republican Senate Majority Leader Joseph Bruno, were in the can.

The real drama revolved around Assembly Speaker Sheldon Silver of Lower Manhattan, again not elected by Brooklynites but deeply engaged in city dealmaking. The Times reported: Yesterday's vote followed days of intense negotiation between officials at the Empire State Development Corporation, which is overseeing the project, and aides to Sheldon Silver, the speaker of the State Assembly, who has one of three votes on the control board.None of those voting, however, got a chance to express any dissent. The approval vote took just five minutes.

# posted by Norman Oder @ 6:02 AM

Comments:
When is a ULURP hearing (and process) not a ULURP hearing (and process)? When the public officials before whom the hearing is held say that isn’t within their purview to do anything concerning the public action issues about which the public testifies at the hearing.

Before we get too enthusiastic about the beneficial result of the fuller ULURP process that applied to Columbia’s rezoning and takeover of West Harlem, let’s remind ourselves that, though it was a fuller process, what is being proposed by Columbia was not treated to a full ULURP process.

Yes, Columbia ‘s expansion will not integrate or share space with the neighborhood, involves a great deal of rezoning principally for the special benefit of Columbia, will wipe out a swath of older buildings, including historic ones, and does not look to designate as landmark old buildings that might actually be saved. Yes, all of this was subject to ULURP review and hearings, but one of the most highly objectionable aspects where the Columbia plan diverges from the plan wanted by the Community Board is Columbia’s strategic use of eminent domain to acquire property. The eminent domain is to be exercised by the Empire State Development Corporation and this was not treated as being subject to ULURP.

The City Planning Commission held hearings but the Planning Commissioners voting for Columbia’s plan pointedly put it on record that eminent domain was not something they were deciding upon and that this was instead the State’s responsibility. They side-stepped the issue which is to say they gave the public testimony against eminent domain no effect (and also ignored CB9's position on this). Similarly, there were City Council Members last week who excoriated as abysmal the situation with eminent domain, complained about the lack of local and City Council control and called for the state legislature to pass remedial legislation to fix it. Then, they voted for Columbia’s plan since they said they could only be voting on something other than eminent domain as it was so entirely out of their control that it was, perforce, outside their preview. This is again to say that they gave the public testimony against eminent domain no effect while also ignoring the Community Board on this.

It was all of course an exercise in political buck passing. The idea of ULURP is political accountability. So long as eminent domain is done with the distortion of a State agency acting outside the ULURP process (which it needn’t be) there has not been a full ULURP process.Had there been a full ULURP process where it was absolutely clear that it was the responsibility of public officials to consider and act on eminent domain based upon the public’s testimony and community board input the vote tallies might have been different. Yes, if the public and community board had been treated with greater deference results might have been different.

# posted by MDDW : 10:43 PM


Name: Norman Oder
Contact: timesreport@hotmail.com
Info: http://tinyurl.com/al22x

http://atlanticyardsreport.blogspot.com/2007/12/columbia-vote-35-5-6-vs-ay-vote-4-0.html

Despite Earlier Defiance, Holdouts in Columbia’s Expansion Zone Are Down to 3



N.Y. / Region

Despite Earlier Defiance, Holdouts in Columbia’s Expansion Zone Are Down to 3

By TIMOTHY WILLIAMS
Published: December 21, 2007

When Columbia University began buying property north of its Morningside Heights campus for its planned expansion a few years ago, a group of longtime business owners formed an alliance and pledged never to sell.

Nick Sprayregen, a Harlem landowner,
is taking a stand against Columbia.
Fred R. Conrad/The New York Times

Now, three years later, all but two of the six family-owned firms in the alliance, the West Harlem Business Group, have sold their property to the university, leaving the two owners increasingly edgy about what might happen next, as Columbia prepares to start the largest expansion in its history.

Those two businesses — both moving and storage concerns — along with the owner of two service stations who was not in the alliance, are the only remaining holdouts in the Manhattanville neighborhood. More than three dozen others — meat wholesale companies, auto body shops, restaurants, construction supply stores, tire repair shops, warehouses and a window manufacturer among them — have sold their property to Columbia and have agreed to leave once construction begins.

A Columbia official said demolition could begin by summer. The university has said it plans to keep only about three buildings in the narrow 17-acre stretch, which is bounded roughly by 133rd Street on the north, Broadway on the east, 125th Street on the south and Riverside Drive on the west. Columbia plans to move many of its science laboratories and business and arts schools onto the new campus eventually.

Thursday, a day after the City Council approved a rezoning plan to allow the university’s expansion, one of the three owners said she was too distraught to speak, another vowed to continue fighting all the way to the Supreme Court, and the third, the Singh family, owner of the service stations, declined to comment.

Columbia would not say whether it was negotiating with the business owners. It has said it owns about 90 percent of the privately owned property in the 17-acre area. It has not ruled out asking the state to invoke eminent domain to obtain the remaining commercial properties in the area.

Some of the buildings purchased by the university have been boarded up, apparently ready for demolition, and the university has some administrative offices in buildings that will remain standing.

Despite the impending changes, the neighborhood was active Thursday. People were eating Big Macs at a McDonald’s and arroz con pollo at La Floridita, changing worn tires at a repair shop without a visible name, and dropping off furniture at storage centers. Each of those businesses is scheduled for demolition.

Anne Z. Whitman, owner of Hudson North American, a moving and storage company on Broadway between 129th and 130th Streets, said on Thursday that the stress of the City Council rezoning vote had made thoughts about her situation too painful to discuss.
“I can’t talk without becoming emotional,” Ms. Whitman said during a brief telephone interview.

During an interview last year, Ms. Whitman said the university had offered her $4 million for her six-story, 35,000-square foot building.

“No way Columbia is going to steal this property right out from underneath me,” Ms. Whitman said in August 2006. “Remember that man who stood in front of the tank at Tiananmen Square? That’s me.”

Ms. Whitman’s father, Joseph A. Zuhusky, a former F.B.I. agent, started in the moving and storage business after he bought several buildings in Harlem in the 1960s and ’70s. Several of his children followed suit, and eventually Ms. Whitman and two of her brothers purchased their father’s buildings.

While Ms. Whitman operates Hudson North American, her brothers own Despatch Moving and Storage in a 10-story building a block up Broadway.

The family was among the founders of the West Harlem Business Group, and was among the most vocal about their unwillingness to sell. But in August, her brothers accepted an offer from the university, creating a family rift and leaving Ms. Whitman feeling isolated. The terms of the sale have not been made public, and a call seeking comment at Despatch Moving and Storage was not returned Thursday.

The second moving and storage owner is Nicholas Sprayregen, 44, who is also the largest landowner in Manhattanville aside from the university. He owns five Tuck-It-Away Self-Storage buildings, four of which could become targets of forced sale under the power of eminent domain.

While most of his 300,000 square feet of space is reserved for self-storage, he also rents space to an El Mundo Department Store at Broadway and 133rd Street, and to a C-Town Supermarket one block away at 134th Street.

Mr. Sprayregen, who has become the face of the opposition, makes no secret that he is wealthy.

He has vowed that he will spend as much money as it takes to keep the university from getting his property via eminent domain. On one of his buildings hangs a giant banner, reading “Stop Eminent Domain Abuse!” that is visible to riders on the No. 1 subway line through Harlem.
“This isn’t about money, I’m fighting them over principle — I strongly believe the use of eminent domain here is wrong,” said Mr. Sprayregen, who said he has finished 20 marathons but has stopped running in order to devote more time to battling the university.

“I have the strong desire — and the financial ability — to take this all the way to the Supreme Court,” he said.

Mr. Sprayregen said he had spent $500,000 so far, including hiring a lobbyist and Norman Siegel, a civil liberties lawyer.

His wealth does not seem to be a match for Columbia, according to city records. During the past two years, the university paid nearly $1.2 million to some of the city’s most powerful lobbying firms — including Bolton-St. Johns, Greenberg Traurig, and Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel — to push for the rezoning. Columbia officials say that figure includes legal fees.

The targets of their efforts included Deputy Mayor Daniel L. Doctoroff, Council Speaker Christine C. Quinn, Borough President Scott M. Stringer and Councilman Robert Jackson, whose district includes Manhattanville.

In recent weeks, Mr. Sprayregen said, he has talked with the university about trading his buildings inside the expansion zone for university property outside the zone. Columbia would not comment on Thursday about those discussions.

“What’s the need for the threat of eminent domain?” he asked. “It’s not like I’m standing in the way of a highway or a train track.”
Ray Rivera contributed reporting.

http://www.nytimes.com/2007/12/21/nyregion/21columbia.html?ref=nyregion

Sprayregen's No Custer

The Neighborhood Retail Alliance
Protecting Neighborhood Business For Over 20 Years
Friday, December 21, 2007

Sprayregen's No Custer

In this morning's NY Times, the paper focuses on the last remaining property owners who are holding out against the university's expansion. Nick Sprayregen, Anne Whitman and company are portrayed as the Last of the Mohicans, with a little bit of General Custer as well.

What the paper's missing, is that these holdouts pose a real threat, and if good faith bargaining isn't going to take place, Columbia's plans are gonna be put into a delaying pattern that will frustrate all of the folks who're looking to get to work on the expansion. As Whitman says; “No way Columbia is going to steal this property right out from underneath me,” Ms. Whitman said in August 2006. “Remember that man who stood in front of the tank at Tiananmen Square? That’s me.”

Sprayregen feels the same: "He has vowed that he will spend as much money as it takes to keep the university from getting his property via eminent domain. On one of his buildings hangs a giant banner, reading “Stop Eminent Domain Abuse!” that is visible to riders on the No. 1 subway line through Harlem. “This isn’t about money, I’m fighting them over principle — I strongly believe the use of eminent domain here is wrong,” said Mr. Sprayregen, who said he has finished 20 marathons but has stopped running in order to devote more time to battling the university. “I have the strong desire — and the financial ability — to take this all the way to the Supreme Court,” he said.

"It really behooves everyone involved to get real negotiations going-and our conversations with all of the key local officials indicates that this will happen soon; with even ESDC apparently interested in avoiding a widely publicized and messy legal battle. As Sprayregen told the Times: "In recent weeks, Mr. Sprayregen said, he has talked with the university about trading his buildings inside the expansion zone for university property outside the zone. Columbia would not comment on Thursday about those discussions."

While it's unfortunate that property rights aren't of much concern to the City Council leadership, the impediment that these intrepid folks pose to the city's vision of progress is the incentive that will generate the kind of dialogue that can only lead to a win for all involved. In the end, we believe the city and Columbia will deal, and the folks of West Harlem just might get a measure of equity as a result.

That being said, the Columbia ED fight will be seen as a tempest in a tea pot when compared to the battle over Willets Point; where over 200 businesses and thousands of immigrant workers are at risk. As the NY Daily News points out this morning: "The battle over Columbia University's expansion plan has ended in the City Council. But the bigger war over eminent domain may be just getting started."

Which is going to put Christine Quinn directly in the spotlight, as she continues her metamorphosis from community activist to, well we're not really sure. As she told the News: "Council Speaker Christine Quinn (D-Manhattan) offered that eminent domain "should be used carefully and cautiously, and it should only by used when there is an overriding greater good in the interest of the city." What we do know, is that there's a certain townhouse on 79th Street that will never face the ED bulldozer.

# posted by Neighborhood Retail Alliance @ 9:07 AM

http://momandpopnyc.blogspot.com/2007/12/sprayregens-no-custer.html