Saturday, March 03, 2007

Will green roofs be the next hot trend?



Will green roofs be the next hot trend?
By Cliff Bowden • Bankrate.com


If the term "green roof" evokes an image of a few potted plants arranged tastefully on the top of a building, then the time seems ripe to rethink that definition. Green roofs may be the next hot trend to cool down the urban landscape and lower the cost of controlling temperatures in the average suburban home.

Green roofs are generally categorized by one of two forms. Extensive green roofs, also known as eco-roofs or low-profile roofs, are made with a few thin layers of soil, are lightweight, relatively less expensive, and require very little maintenance. Extensive green roofs are the correct choice, the experts say, when the primary desire is for an ecological cover with limited human access.

Intensive or high-profile green roofs, on the other hand, look like traditional roof gardens because a much wider variety of plant material is usually included. They have soil depths ranging from 8 to 12 inches, with growth that can extend upward of 15 feet. They can include such architectural features as waterfalls, ponds and gazebos. Their construction and maintenance is much more costly.

Green roofs

A feeling of home
When Focus Development planned the Church Street Station Condominiums near Northwestern University in Chicago, a garden roof where unit owners could get away from the hustle and bustle of daily life was part of plans to create a place buyers would call home. To make it, Chicago's American Hydrotech used what it calls time-tested components so that the garden would bloom and flourish season after season.Photo courtesy American Hydrotech, Inc.

Green roofs
Living data center

The Living Roof on Hamerschag Hall at Carnegie Mellon University was designed for ongoing research on the benefits of storm-water management and energy conservation for buildings housing classrooms, labs and administrative offices. A ''datalogger'' is positioned in an office within the building for ease in downloading figures on such variables as thermal fluctuations and the amount and positioning of water runoff.Photo courtesy G.R.E.E.N. research co-operative, Southern Illinois University Edwardsville

SLIDESHOW:
1 8





New to the U.S.Tristan Roberts, an executive with BuildingGreen in Brattleboro, Vt., says that while interest in green roofs within the U.S. has only taken root in the past decade, green roofs as a phenomenon have a long history.

"They go back for hundreds, if not thousands, of years," he says, "as sod houses in this country and as living roofs in Europe. The modern equivalent has been around for quite a few decades and is much more prevalent in Europe, particularly Germany."

BuildingGreen, which bills itself as an independent operation dedicated to distributing information to building-industry professionals and policymakers, sees green roofs as one way to improve the environmental performance and reduce the adverse impacts of traditional buildings.

Bill Retzlaff, chair of biological sciences at Southern Illinois University-Edwardsville and coordinator of the research cooperative Green Roof Environmental Evaluation Network, or G.R.E.E.N., says the green-roof industry in the U.S. is very new. "While Europeans have been doing them for a long time, our climate is different, so there's not much useful data on their performance here."

The G.R.E.E.N. cooperative was established two years ago to evaluate green-roof technology in the Midwest, says Retzlaff. In addition to the university, members include several commercial suppliers and Greenroofs.com, an international resource and online information portal for the green-roof industry.

"Our longest-running project has been on the ground since September 2005," says Retzlaff. "We now have seven specific green-roof projects at our field site. We're evaluating storm-water runoff and temperatures, comparing those results with the results we get with a flat membrane roof."

While green roofs don't necessarily require a lot of care, it's a misconception to suppose that they will just take care of themselves. G.R.E.E.N. researchers are working with systems that don't require a lot of maintenance, but there's no such thing as a no-maintenance green roof.
"You must water them for the first 10 weeks or so," Retzlaff says. "They have to get established, just like any other garden. And at minimum, you need to add some plants, fertilize and weed a couple of times a year."

Before establishing a green roof, consumers need to have some sense of what they want from it beyond the vague notion that they're good for the environment.

"Everything from roof materials to plant varieties has to be picked for the issue you want to address -- storm-water retention, more green space or thermal control," says Retzlaff. "Every green roof provides some of each of these things, but to decide you want a green roof because it's a good thing is not enough."

Benefits of lofty gardensFor example, Retzlaff cites a green roof in St. Louis on the seventh floor of a children's hospital that has a pond and large walkways.

"It costs $200,000 a year to maintain," he says. "But the benefit is that when those children go through those double-glass doors leading to the green roof, they can forget everything inside."
Retzlaff says Ford Motor Co. has a 10-acre extensive green roof in Dearborn, Mich., that remains the largest in the U.S. "It has a 2-inch depth, so they have to irrigate it. They catch storm water in retention ponds and irrigate with that."

In Chicago, the mayor is interested in lowering the urban center's heat-island effects that drive up temperatures. "He has been told by various research facilities that if about 65 percent of downtown buildings had green roofs, that would lower the heat by about 10 degrees," says Retzlaff. "So the city issues grants to offset the costs of installation and will fast-track building permits if a green roof is included."

Retzlaff expects G.R.E.E.N. to become a resource for would-be green-roofers around the country. "Eventually people will be able to contact us to find out exactly what growing medium and plants are best for their climate and purpose."

BuildingGreen's Roberts says he sees more incentives -- and so more green roofs -- for commercial buildings than homes right now, but there are several benefits that could make them appealing to homeowners. They include increased insulation and the fact that the additional garden materials make a roof more durable.

"For homeowners, a green roof on a low slope or flat roof can extend the life of that roof many years by shielding it from rain water and ultraviolet sun rays, which degrade roofing materials," says Roberts.

Green roofs also filter out some air pollutants, he adds.

Green roof solutionsIn addition to collecting storm water, reducing urban heat and acting as insulation to cool down a building or home's occupants, green roofs are seen by advocates as opportunities to increase food production, beautify cities and provide sound insulation by absorbing, reflecting or deflecting noise by machinery, planes and traffic.

For the average homeowner concerned with rising energy costs, it's likely the insulation qualities of green roofs would prove most appealing.

Dennis Yanez, national marketing manager for Chicago's American Hydrotech, says his company offers waterproofing and all the components for garden-roof assembly, including Styrofoam, soil and plants. American Hydrotech also offers a single-source warranty, which Yanez says is unique in the industry. Clients are primarily architects and developers.

"We have not done a lot in the consumer market," Yanez says. "We do have some homes that have our systems in them, but they're all higher-end, in the 7,000- to 10,000-square-foot range."

That's because a homeowner who wants a green roof, Yanez says, would have to start by hiring an engineer or architect to design it. He estimates the price of building a green roof from "the high teens to the low $20s" per square foot.

Greenroofs.com estimates costs at $9 to $25 per square foot for extensive green roofs and $25 to $40 or more for the intensive variety.

"We've seen they have a growing appeal," Yanez says. "In general, sustainability and green building has taken off in the past five or six years. Putting together buildings that disrupt the environment as little as possible is becoming a real concern."

Bankrate.com's corrections policy
-- Posted: Feb. 15, 2007

Friday, March 02, 2007

City Council Calendar for Monday, March 5, 2007 - Sunday, March 11, 2007

Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2007 18:23:22 -0500 (EST)
From: "NYC Council Legislative Update" Add to Address Book Add Mobile Alert
To: reysmont@yahoo.com
Subject: City Council Calendar for Monday, March 5, 2007 - Sunday, March 11, 2007

City Council Calendar for Monday, March 5, 2007 - Sunday, March 11, 2007


- - - Recent Council Legislation - - - -

On Wednesday, February 28th the City Council passed a number of pieces of
legislation that impact a wide spectrum of issues affecting New Yorkers. This
included a package of bills to make nightlife safer in New York City through:
- Enabling the City to shut down businesses selling or making fake ID's;
- Requiring the installation of security cameras at club entrances and exits;
and
- Establishing an independent monitoring program for clubs with serious or
repeat violations.

Additionally, the Council passed bills to:
- License and regulate pedicabs;
- Require tax preparation companies to provide clients with a customer bill of
rights;
- Approve a budget modification to recognize $2.2 billion more in City
revenues; and
- Extend the life of the Wetlands Task Force.

Finally, the Council passed resolutions to:
- Call upon the State Legislature and State Liquor Authority to modify the use
of bottle services in nightlife establishments; and
- Call for a symbolic moratorium on use of the 'N' word in New York City.

For more, see the City Council Home page at http://www.nyccouncil.info

Contact Council Speaker Quinn at:
http://www.nyccouncil.info/rightnow/contactspkr.cfm


- - - - - Legislative Calendar - - - - -

** Meetings for Monday, March 5, 2007 **

Committee(s) on: Education
1:30 PM, Council Chambers - City Hall
Oversight - Empowerment Schools:What Have We Learned So Far?
Proposed Res 267-A - Resolution calling upon the Department of Education to
assess the impact of its decision to decrease milk choices in New York City's
public schools in order to evaluate the effect of this policy change on children's
milk consumption and nutrition.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

** Meetings for Tuesday, March 6, 2007 **

Subcommittee(s) on: Zoning & Franchises
9:30 AM, Committee Room - City Hall
Details: See Land Use Calendar Available Thursday, March 1, 2007 in Room 5 City
Hall

Committee(s) on: Finance
Time: 10:00 AM
Location: Council Chambers - City Hall

New York City Council Fiscal Year 2008 Preliminary Budget, Mayor's FY '07
Preliminary Management Report and Agency Oversight Hearings
10:00 a.m. - Testimony of City Agencies and officials
3:00 p.m. - Public

Subcommittee(s) on: Landmarks, Public Siting & Maritime Uses
11:00 AM, Committee Room - City Hall
Details: See Land Use Calendar Available Thursday, March 1, 2007 in Room 5
City Hall

Committee(s) on: Housing & Buildings
1:00 PM, Committee Room - City Hall

New York City Council Fiscal Year 2008 Preliminary Budget, Mayor's FY '07
Preliminary Management Report and Agency Oversight Hearings
1:00 p.m. - 4:30 p.m. Testimony of City Agencies and officials
4:30 p.m. - Public

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

** Meetings for Wednesday, March 7, 2007 **

Committee(s) on: Governmental Operations
10:00 AM, Council Chambers - City Hall

New York City Council Fiscal Year 2008 Preliminary Budget, Mayor's FY '07
Preliminary Management Report and Agency Oversight Hearings
10:00 a.m. - 3:15 p.m. - Testimony of City Agencies and officials
3:15 p.m. - Public


Committee(s) on: Economic Development
10:00 AM, Committee Room - City Hall
Details: New York City Council Fiscal Year 2008 Preliminary Budget, Mayor's
FY '07 Preliminary Management Report and Agency Oversight Hearings

10:00 a.m. - 12:30 p.m. Testimony of City Agencies and officials
12:30 p.m. - Public

Subcommittee(s) on: Planning, Dispositions & Concessions
10:00 AM, 250 Broadway, 16th Floor
Details: See Land Use Calendar Available Thursday, March 1, 2007 in Room 5 City
Hall

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

** Meetings for Thursday, March 8, 2007 **

Committee(s) on: Oversight and Investigations
Time: 10:00 AM, Council Chambers - City Hall

New York City Council Fiscal Year 2008 Preliminary Budget, Mayor's FY '07
Preliminary Management Report and Agency Oversight Hearings
10:00 a.m. - 10:45 p.m. Testimony of City Agencies and officials
10:45 p.m. - Public

Committee(s) on: Land Use
10:00 AM, Committee Room - City Hall
Details: All items reported out of the subcommittees AND SUCH OTHER BUSINESS
AS MAY BE NECESSARY

Committee(s) on: Land Use
11:00 AM, Committee Room - City Hall
Details: New York City Council Fiscal Year 2008 Preliminary Budget, Mayor's FY
'07 Preliminary Management Report and Agency Oversight Hearings

11:00 a.m. - 2:00 p.m. Testimony of City Agencies and officials
2:00 p.m. - Public

Committee(s) on: Youth Services
11:30 AM, Council Chambers - City Hall
Chairperson(s): Lewis A. Fidler
Details: New York City Council Fiscal Year 2008 Preliminary Budget, Mayor's
FY '07 Preliminary Management Report and Agency Oversight Hearings
11:30 a.m. - Department of Youth and Community Development
12:30 p.m. - Public

Committee(s) on: Sanitation & Solid Waste Management
2:00 PM, Council Chambers - City Hall
Details: New York City Council Fiscal Year 2008 Preliminary Budget, Mayor's FY
'07 Preliminary Management Report and Agency Oversight Hearings
2:00 p.m. - Department of Sanitation
4:00 p.m. - Public
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

** Meetings for Friday, March 9, 2007 **

Committee(s) on: Transportation
10:00 AM, Committee Room - City Hall
Details: New York City Council Fiscal Year 2008 Preliminary Budget, Mayor's FY
'07 Preliminary Management Report and Agency Oversight Hearings

10:00 a.m. - 1:15 p.m. Testimony of City Agencies and officials
1:15 p.m. - Public

Joint Meeting. Committee(s) on: Public Safety; Civil Rights

10:00 AM, Council Chambers - City Hall
Details: Oversight - Internal and External Monitoring of the NYPD

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

** Meetings for Saturday, March 10, 2007 **

-- no public meetings scheduled --

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

** Meetings for Sunday, March 11, 2007 **

-- no public meetings scheduled --


More information at http://www.nyccouncil.info/rightnow/calendarpage.cfm



This is the City Council news you requested for: Council Legislative Calendar
Email Updates

Note: The City Council list serve is now being powered by NYC.gov

To subscribe, please go to this link:
https://www.nyc.gov/portal/signin.jsp

Comment on this news service:
http://www.nyc.gov/html/misc/html/council_news_feedback.html

PLEASE DO NOT REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE!

Thursday, March 01, 2007

Electric Transformers to Displace Books

the Campus
Home > News


Electric Transformers to Displace Books
Collections on first floor of Cohen may be "tossed"
Rodolfo Leyton and Lydia Shestopalova
Issue date: 1/29/07 Section: News

Media Credit: Sergey Kadinsky

This reading haven may be no more.

Media Credit: Sergey Kadinsky

These books are older than the campus.

Soon students may really want to stay out of the "basement" of the Cohen Library. The latest plans for the development of the South Campus science complex feature six electric transformers occupying the first floor of the Morris R. Cohen Library, which is currently home to electronic classrooms, study carrels and an enviable collection of non-science journals.
The purpose of the transformer station is to increase electrical power to South Campus. Because power mains are located along Amsterdam Avenue, a midway station is necessary to channel the electricity between the North Campus and the South Campus.
Originally, the station was to be placed in the area outside of the North Academic Center, which currently serves as the campus parking lot. However, plans were changed, and the transformers are now slated to be placed inside the Cohen Library, which is located inside the NAC, the school's main academic and social space. According to the latest plans released, the transformer facility will occupy 16,700 sq. ft. of the 20,722 sq. ft footprint of the library.
Clearing the first floor for the transformers entails removing the books, periodicals, and other materials currently housed there. Chief Operating Officer and Senior Vice President Lois Cronholm, who developed the plan, proposed the installation of compact shelving to distribute the displaced library collection onto the other floors. Some consider the plan unreasonable, citing the high cost of the system and the additional need to reinforce all the floors of the library to handle the added weight. According to faculty at the library, given the high cost of relocation, the collections currently housed on the first floor will simply be "tossed out."
Dr. Cronholm, President Gregory Williams, and Provost Zeev Dagan were all unresponsive to inquiries on this matter.

Wednesday, February 28, 2007

MANHATTAN DA ANNOUNCES THE LEGAL BOUND PROGRAM 2007 SUMMER INTERNSHIP PROGRAM




ROBERT M. MORGENTHAU


MANHATTAN DISTRICT ATTORNEY




ANNOUNCES


THE LEGAL BOUND PROGRAM


2007 SUMMER INTERNSHIP PROGRAM



The Manhattan District Attorney’s Office invites Junior High and High School students to apply for the 2007 SUMMER INTERNSHIP PROGRAM.



To apply, students must reside in Manhattan and be between the ages of 14 and 17 (18 years old if still in high school).



Qualified students should send a resume and an essay explaining their interest in law to the address listed below and postmarked no later than FRIDAY, MARCH 30, 2007. We will contact each student who sends these materials and schedule an interview. Interview appointments are limited.



Please send a resume and essay to:
Community Affairs Unit
New York County District Attorney’s Office
Attention: Ms. Carol Ragsdale
One Hogan Place, Room 824
New York, New York 10013
Telephone: (212) 335-9082



Interviews are scheduled Monday through Thursday (during after-school hours) from mid-January through April. FRIDAY, APRIL 27, 2007 is the last day of interviews. The interviews will take place at the Manhattan District Attorney’s Office, located at 1 Hogan Place or the Northern Manhattan Office, located in the Adam Clayton Powell State Office building, 163 West 125th Street.



Students must bring two reference letters (one from the current school) to the interview.

http://manhattanda.org/officebrochures/Legal_Bound_brochure.pdf

Revised 9/6/06

Parking Becomes Scarcer at City College - Restrictions Placed on Convent Avenue

The Campus
Current Issue: January 29, 2007

Home > News

Parking Becomes Scarcer at City College
Restrictions Placed on Convent Avenue
Aalia Ali
Issue date: 1/29/07 Section: News
Article Tools
Page 1 of 1

Media Credit: Annie Deng





"No Standing" at CCNY

Media Credit: Annie Deng




Parking After Sunset

Media Credit: Annie Deng





The signs have always been there.


Parking spaces are a rare commodity at City College and newly reinstated parking restrictions on Convent Avenue are further limiting the amount of parking spaces available to the CCNY community.

With the exception of authorized vehicles-NYC buses, CCNY buses, official vans, delivery trucks and vehicles with approved handicapped insignias-there is no standing on Convent Avenue between 8 a.m. and 6 p.m. Furthermore, only authorized vehicles may enter the 135th or 140th Street gates. Those who violate the law will be issued a summons from the NYPD.

According to Jordis Reyes-Montblanc, Chairman of Community Board 9, the restrictions are the result of a joint effort between the area's community board, the Department of Transportation, and the NYPD.

The terrorist attacks on Sept. 11, 2001 devastated much of the Borough of Manhattan Community College (BMCC) campus, and left the college with a shortage of space in which classes could be conducted. As a result, City College accommodated a number of BMCC classes, and was given permission to allow parking on Convent Avenue in order to compensate for parking spaces that would be lost to visiting BMCC students. A privilege that, according to Montblanc, City College took advantage of.

"Special allowance was made after 9-11 because of the Borough of Manhattan Community College," he said. "And CCNY took it upon themselves to sell parking spaces."

However, now that BMCC is no longer offering classes at City College, the city has revoked the allowance of parking on Convent Avenue. "It's gone back to the way it's been," Montblanc said.

Lois Cronholm, Senior Vice President and Chief Operating Officer at CCNY, was contacted for comment, however inquiries sent have yet to be replied.

Sunday, February 25, 2007

City Council Calendar for Monday, February 26, 2007 - Sunday, March 4, 2007

Date: Sun, 25 Feb 2007 19:32:29 -0500 (EST)
From: "NYC Council Legislative Update"
To: reysmont@yahoo.com
Subject: City Council Calendar for Monday, February 26, 2007 - Sunday, March 4, 2007

City Council Calendar for Monday, February 26, 2007 - Sunday, March 4, 2007

If you wish to subscribe, you may forward to this email
address legcalendar@council.nyc.ny.us with "subscribe" in the subject.

- - - Speaker tours community Health Care center, promotes plan to open 10
community health care centers
- - - -
On Friday, February 23rd, the Council Speaker Christine Quinn toured Betances
health care clinic in Lower Manhattan, a model for community-centered health
care. During her State of the City speech, Council Speaker Christine Quinn
outlined a plan to invest $25 million towards providing ten state-of-the-art
healthcare facilities in high-need communities over the next five years. For more,
read the press release at
http://www.nyccouncil.info/pdf_files/newswire/015_022307_betances_health.pdf

*** How is health care in your community? ***
How do you think that health care could be better addressed in your community?
Contact Speaker Quinn at:
http://www.nyccouncil.info/rightnow/contactspkr.cfm?issue=Health


- - - - - Legislative Calendar - - - - -

** Meetings for Monday, February 26, 2007 **

Committee(s) on: Civil Service & Labor
10:00 AM, Committee Room - City Hall
Oversight - The New York City Civil Service Commission
Committee(s) on: Technology in Government 10:00 AM. Hearing Room - 250
Broadway, 14th Floor
Oversight - Information Technology Strategic Direction

Committee(s) on: Governmental Operations
10:00 AM. Hearing Room - 250 Broadway, 16th Floor
Proposed Int. No. 502-A - A Local Law to amend the administrative code of the
City of New York, in relation to the contents of a lobbyist's statement of
registration.
Oversight - Review of the New York City Campaign Finance Board's Audit
Practices and Procedures

Committee(s) on: Civil Rights
10:00 AM. Council Chambers - City Hall
Proposed Res 693-A - Resolution calling on the Council of the City of New York
to declare a symbolic moratorium on the use of the "N" word in New York City.

Committee(s) on: Environmental Protection
1:00 PM. Committee Room - City Hall
Int 505 - A Local Law in relation to the temporary task force to study the
feasibility of transferring city-owned wetlands to the jurisdiction of the
Department of Parks and Recreation.
Int 506 - A Local Law to amend the administrative code of the City of New York,
in relation to the creation of a comprehensive wetlands protection policy for
New York City.

Committee(s) on: Women's Issues
1:00 PM. Hearing Room - 250 Broadway, 16th Floor
Oversight - Exploring Issues Facing Adolescent Girls in NYC

Committee(s) on: Fire & Criminal Justice Services
1:00 PM. Hearing Room - 250 Broadway, 14th Floor
Oversight - New York City Fire Department Expanded Firefighter Training
Committee(s) on: Small Business
Time: 1:30 PM - Brooklyn Workforce 1 Career Center
Details: Tour: Brooklyn Workforce 1 Care
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

** Meetings for Tuesday, February 27, 2007 **

Committee(s) on: Higher Education
1:00 PM. Committee Room - City Hall
Oversight - Connecting College Students with Health Insurance

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

** Meetings for Wednesday, February 28, 2007 **

Committee(s) on: Consumer Affairs
10:00 AM. Committee Room - City Hall
Proposed Int 81-A - A Local Law to amend the administrative code of the City of
New York, in relation to the consumer bill of rights regarding tax preparers.

Committee(s) on: Finance
11:00 AM. Committee Room - City Hall
Agenda to be announced

Stated Council Meeting
Council Chambers, City Hall
Ceremonial Tributes ......... 1:00 p.m.
Agenda ...... 1:30 p.m.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

** Meetings for Thursday, March 1, 2007 **

Committee(s) on: Health
10:00 AM. Council Chambers - City Hall
Int 517 - A Local Law to amend the administrative code of the City of New York,
in relation to prohibiting the use of artificial trans fats by food service
establishments and mobile food unit commissaries.

Committee(s) on: Governmental Operations
10:00 AM. Hearing Room - 250 Broadway, 16th Floor
Agenda to be announced

Committee(s) on: Housing & Buildings
10:00 AM. Hearing Room - 250 Broadway, 14th Floor
Oversight - Findings of the Department of Buildings’ Suspended Scaffold
Worker Safety Task Force
Int [#TBD] - A Local Law to amend the administrative code of the City of New
York, in relation to inspection requirements for suspended scaffolds.
Int [#TBD] - A Local Law to amend the administrative code of the City of New
York, in relation to notification to the department prior to the use or
installation of suspended scaffolds hung from c-hooks and outrigger beams.
Int [#TBD] - A Local Law to amend the administrative code of the City of New
York, in relation to penalties for certain violations committed by licensed
riggers or persons performing the functions and duties of licensed riggers, or
other persons responsible for keeping inspection records at job sites.
AND SUCH OTHER BUSINESS AS MAY BE NECESSARY

Committee(s) on: General Welfare
10:10 AM. Committee Room - City Hall
Int 501 - A Local Law to amend the administrative code of the City of New York,
in relation to domestic partnerships.

Committee(s) on: Transportation
1:00 PM. Council Chambers - City Hall
Oversight - How Do We Achieve PlanNYC 2030’s Sustainability Goal to Improve
Travel Times by Adding Transit Capacity for Millions More Residents, Visitors,
and Workers?
Proposed Int 24-A - A Local Law to amend the administrative code of the City of
New York, in relation to bicycles used for commercial purposes.
Proposed Int 58-A - A Local Law to amend the administrative code of the City of
New York, in relation to requiring that businesses that use bicycle operators
and delivery services that dispatch bicycle operators post signs at the place of
employment detailing proper bicycle safety procedures.

Committee(s) on: Veterans
1:00 PM. Committee Room - City Hall
Oversight - The Mayor's Office of Veterans' Affairs

Committee(s) on: Parks & Recreation
1:00 PM. Hearing Room - 250 Broadway, 16th Floor
Oversight - "The Status of Crime Prevention and Safety In Parks."
Oversight - The City's PLANYC 2030 sustainability goal to "Ensure that all New
Yorkers Live Within a 10-minute Walk of a Park" and how best to achieve it.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

** Meetings for Friday, March 2, 2007 **

-- no public meetings scheduled --

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

** Meetings for Saturday, March 3, 2007 **

-- no public meetings scheduled --

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

** Meetings for Sunday, March 4, 2007 **

-- no public meetings scheduled --


More information at http://www.nyccouncil.info/rightnow/calendarpage.cfm

This is the City Council news you requested for: Council Legislative Calendar
Email Updates

Note: The City Council list serve is now being powered by www.NYC.gov

To subscribe, please go to this link:
https://www.nyc.gov/portal/signin.jsp

Comment on this news service:
http://www.nyc.gov/html/misc/html/council_news_feedback.html

PLEASE DO NOT REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE!

Columbia launches land-grab plan - Many in West Harlem would be booted from their homes


Columbia launches land-grab plan

Many in West Harlem would be booted from their homes

BY DOUGLAS FEIDEN
DAILY NEWS STAFF WRITER


When Columbia University looks at West Harlem, it sees an urban moonscape: Desolate and underutilized, it is occupied mostly by auto body shops, chain-link fences and roll-down metal gates. It must be demolished.


When Luisa Henriquez walks the same blocks, she sees the American Dream: Inexpensive and friendly, it is the only place in New York City today where she can afford to buy her own home. It must be preserved.

That clash between town and gown is part of a land battle that has erupted over Manhattanville, a 17-acre industrial parcel near the Hudson River that's bigger than the site of the World Trade Center.

Columbia wants to tear down most of the low-rise buildings, and relocate the low-income inhabitants and blue-collar workers. Over a 25-year period, it would build a gleaming $7 billion super-campus, creating 6.8 million square feet of space by 2030 to ensure its competitive future.

But the elite school isn't the only party worried about its future. Faced with the threat of forced evictions, eminent domain and the wrecking ball minority residents and employees in the thinly populated neighborhood are fighting back.

"I've been here for 30 years, I raised my two daughters here. This is my home, my safe haven, my dream come true," said Henriquez, a 52-year old assistant teacher. "I came from the Dominican Republic to find a place like this. Why should I be forced to leave?"

Asked Eduardo Chipe, 66, a cardboard box-maker from Ecuador who has lived in the same building for 38 years, "Why would Columbia threaten our well-being? Where will we go if they kick us out? And what will happen to the children?"

Columbia pledges it will secure "equal or better" housing in the area for all the tenants it eventually displaces.

"We have enormous respect for the people residing in the area, and we will do everything in our power to make their lives better and to make any transition for them as easy as possible," said spokeswoman La-Verna Fountain.

Over two weeks, the Daily News toured Columbia's proposed expansion zone - from 125th to 133rd Sts., between Broadway and 12th Ave. - talking to dozens of immigrant residents, workers, owners of family businesses and artists priced out of SoHo, Williamsburg and the East Village.

"It's not the Garden of Eden," said Alonzo Cisneros, 42, an auto mechanic from Uruguay who has worked in six area shops for 18 years. "But it pays the rent and feeds the kids and it would be a crime to tear it down."

The side streets also reveal hidden treasures that would vanish in any Columbia expansion, like "Hint House," the artist's colony on W. 131st St. that serves as an affordable studio and practice/performance space for 30 artists and musicians.

"The university wants to flatten everything. But it's not thinking about the things that make the city work - like preserving space for artists and furniture restorers and yes, auto shops and storage warehouses," said Tamara Gayer, who lives in Hint House and exhibits in Chelsea galleries.

The dispute has become so heated that even the neighborhood name is fueling debate: Residents call it West Harlem, but Columbians prefer Manhattanville. "They want to take the 'Harlem' out of Harlem," Cisneros said.

Meanwhile, real estate agents trying to cash in have dubbed it "Viva" - or Viaduct Valley - a reference to the elevated trestles for Riverside Drive and the Broadway IRT line that bookend the site.

For Columbia, the stakes are immense. It wants to rezone and redevelop a tract almost as big as Rockefeller Center - and erase most traces of its 19th century industrial past.

In its place would rise numerous glass-curtained towers up to 25 stories tall, homes for a business school and an arts school, plus dormitories, research labs, green spaces and maybe even a hotel and a swimming pool.

An average of 1,200 hardhats a year would labor for 22 years, Fountain said. By 2030, the Ivy League school would add some 6,900 full-time jobs, including scientists seeking cures for asthma, Alzheimer's and Parkinson's diseases.

But first, Columbia says, it needs a contiguous site. It now owns or controls about 70% of the proposed campus and wants to buy or otherwise negotiate acquisitions for the rest.

There are just two problems: Most of the 425 West Harlem residents, who live in 132 apartment units, don't want to move out. And many of the remaining business owners, who employ some 1,200 people, don't want to sell.

So Columbia has asked the Empire State Development Corp. to consider condemning the properties it wants through eminent domain, a controversial practice in which the state takes private properties, at fair market price, ostensibly for a public purpose.

That threat enrages community leaders: "We were promised dialogue, but eminent domain is bulldozer talk," said the Rev. Earl Kooperkamp, pastor of St. Mary's Episcopal Church on W. 126th St.

"My parishioners are scared to death they're going to be put out on the street."

Defiant property owners vow they'll fight any condemnation efforts in court.

"I can't move and I won't move," said Nick Sprayregen, the president of Tuck-It-Away Self-Storage, who owns five warehouse buildings in the area and employs 50 community residents. Columbia is after four of his properties.

"I'm not a supply house for linens that can park my trucks anywhere. I serve 3,000 local families and businesses and I have to be near my customers. Location matters."

So does family: His father, Gerald, started the company, on Broadway and W. 131st St., in 1980. His sister and brother-in-law work there. And his 13-year-old daughter, Emily, has spent school vacations learning the business.

Emily could run the Sprayregen firm one day, he says, and his desire to keep it in the family is why he refuses to sell - and why he hired civil rights lawyer Norman Siegel and spent nearly $400,000 in legal and other bills battling Columbia.

Observers say several other businesses initially talked tough, blasting the school and vowing they'd never sell - then cut deals.

Columbia says most local companies it negotiated with praise its professionalism, and Fountain released letters from three firms thanking it for acting in good faith.

One satisfied customer: The world-famous Madame Alexander Doll Co., at 615 W. 131st. St., which runs a doll showroom and a doll museum, provides doll doctors and conducts factory tours by appointment.

"We're staying in the area, and Columbia made it possible," said Rob Porell, the chief financial officer. He didn't provide details, but said Columbia helpfully addressed Alexander's current and long-term business needs.

Less satisfied are Luisa Henriquez, Eduardo Chipe and the other tenants of a 30-unit, city-owned apartment building on W. 132nd St. that Columbia wants to raze.

Henriquez says the 98 residents were told nothing about the fate of their home until a community board meeting at which Columbia displayed a three-dimensional model of its planned campus: "I looked and looked, and then I asked, 'Where is 602 W. 132nd St.? Where is my home?'"

"There is no such building, it doesn't exist," Henriquez says the university official told her.

Actually, the building has quite a story. Henriquez and her neighbors have spent years fixing it up as part of a unique city program that allows low-income renters to earn sweat equity in their apartments and eventually purchase them as co-ops for $250. Tenants are projected to take title in 2011.

Home ownership had always seemed an impossible dream to the residents, mostly immigrants from Central and South America who work for low or minimum wages in fast-food restaurants, hotels and as home health-care workers.

But Columbia has already held preliminary talks with the city about buying the building and finding replacement housing for the occupants.

Fountain says they won't have to move any earlier than 2015 under the 30-year expansion timetable. Columbia would then relocate them into equal or superior housing, where they'd still be able to purchase TIL co-ops for a nominal $250.

Henriquez says it's wrong to ask 98 people to move when they've worked so hard to stay:

"Columbia University is trying to take away our dream, and our children's dream, which is 602 W. 132nd St.," she said. "Somehow, that doesn't seem very American to me."

Originally published on February 25, 2007

Thursday, February 22, 2007

Master of His Domain

Columbia Spectator
Home > Opinion

Master of His Domain
Ground Up


By Alex Jung
Issue date: 2/22/07 Section: Opinion
PrintEmail Article Tools Page 1 of 2 next >


In his heyday, University President Lee Bollinger, the public intellectual, waxed on about diversity, setting the stage for his landmark case Grutter v. Bollinger. He came to Columbia and staked his tenure, ironically, on grabbing the land north of 125th Street populated by an ethnically diverse community. It seems that Bollinger assimilated into the culture of Columbia rather than shifting the institution. His recent writing parallels his move up through academic echelons and focuses more on a vague "general good" that the University contributes to the global, scientific, and economic spheres. The President Bollinger of Columbia University, who earns over $500,000 and lives in a ready-made mini-mansion, has forgotten that his actions could force people out of their homes above 125th Street and accelerate the gentrification the University has already started. As Bollinger admitted in an opinion piece on Grutter, "Personally, I have never experienced systematic discrimination." Apparently now he is perpetuating it.

Regarding Harlem, Bollinger told the New York Observer that he chose it for expansion because it was a place of "great magic" and "mystique" and close to the current campus. Now it has been decided that the magical land may be blighted-a condition that if the state determines to be true would pave the way for the use of eminent domain and obliterate its allegedly cherished character.

Bollinger maintains that it would be "irresponsible" for the University to take eminent domain off the table. But it does not excuse the University actively hiding information, and consequently power, from the community whose land it wants to take. Spectator used the Freedom of Information Act twice to uncover shady moves by the University: first when it reported that Columbia paid hundreds of thousands to the Empire State Development Corporation to "pay certain costs" that would declare Manhattanville blighted, and recently to provide for its use in the General Project Plan, which assumes the area to be blighted. Eminent domain casts a dark pall over the negotiations with the community and is, in effect, a bullying tactic demonstrating who wields the power. It's not the history of the 1968 expansion that lingers in people's minds, but current misdeeds that indicate Columbia has learned little from the past.

To exercise eminent domain, Columbia has to prove that the area in question is "blighted" and that its presence there will contribute to the public good. Blight, ambiguously defined as "substandard" or "unsanitary," is simply one of the methods Columbia utilizes to further its intentions. The supposedly blighted land is in fact Columbia-owned. An article in the New York Times almost two years ago describes how Columbia is attempting to turn the neighborhood-of which it owns the majority-into a tax-free wasteland of miscellaneous objects. The University has not renewed its leases, thus preventing an influx of new people. For its part, Columbia has nurtured the "unsanitary" conditions that denote "blight," like feeding bleach to a healthy body only to pretend to save it later.

The other factor that allows for the legal exercise of eminent domain, as detailed by the Supreme Court in Kelo v. City of New London, is that the seized land must have a "public purpose." The court allowed the private company Pfizer to build a plant because it would create jobs and pay taxes that would benefit the community. Columbia, a nonprofit, does not pay property tax, and instead Bollinger is attempting to argue the economic benefits the University generates for the city. This January in the New York Daily News, Bollinger wrote that the proposed expansion would create an additional 6,000 jobs. Whether these jobs would be unionized or living wage or would even be guaranteed for community residents are concerns that evidently are irrelevant to the University's quest for land.

"Public" good has also been reformulated to mean the world. Bollinger has repeatedly espoused the need for Columbia to become an international institution. But mulling questions over how to pull the Global South up by its bootstraps becomes a convenient diversion from Columbia's behavior toward West Harlem. The subtext beneath the dialectic of "pro-" and "anti-" created in the expansion debate is one that casts the residents as impeding upon the freedom of an academic institution to contribute to the global marketplace of ideas. But by creating the appearance of blight and articulating the overall goodness Columbia will contribute to the world, the University (and, it hopes, the state) can callously ignore the livelihood of a diverse community including blacks and Hispanics.

On-campus worries over the absence of people of color in the administration and faculty are inherently related to the way expansion occurs. The dissolution of Bollinger's Student Advisory Committee on Diversity (remember that?) after one rocky year is part and parcel of an attitude that has consistently brushed off the concerns of marginalized people. Race, as hard as Bollinger may try to forget, is a telling dynamic in this conversation, especially considering that the gap between him and Harlem residents has shrunk little since 1968.

Back in April 1998, in an editorial titled "The Educational Importance of Race," Bollinger argued that black and white Americans lived in "racial isolation" for too long-a separation that perpetuated "unfounding images and stereotypes." As he further lamented, "There were no countervailing institutions to perform the function of education and understanding. By design, we did not know each other." What huge strides we've made.

Wednesday, February 21, 2007

Bringing Laboratory Space Back to New York

From: "Ruth Eisenberg"
To: "Jordi Reyes-Montblanc"
Subject: Fw: article re East Side Biotech development--http://www.nytimes.com/2007/02/21/realestate/commercial/21life.html?ex=1172898000&en=7fa894b88ecd2f99&ei=5070
Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2007 12:49:53 -0500



Real Estate

Square Feet
Bringing Laboratory Space Back to New York


Alexandria Real Estate Equities
A rendering of the East River Science Park, which is expected to
begin
housing tenants in 2009. Construction is scheduled to start in March.

By ALISON GREGOR
Published: February 21, 2007

When Eric Kandel, a Nobel laureate at Columbia University, formed a life sciences company, Memory Pharmaceuticals, in 1998, a lack of lab space options in New York City eventually forced the business to Montvale, N.J.

Transactions

In March, the same real estate developer that built those Montvale laboratories, Alexandria Real Estate Equities, will break ground on New York City’s first substantial campus for the life sciences, called the East River Science Park. The first tenants are expected in 2009.

Upon completion, the $400 million complex will have three buildings encompassing 1.1 million square feet of specialized laboratories and office space. It will occupy 3.5 acres in Manhattan between East 28th and 29th Streets and First Avenue and Franklin D. Roosevelt Drive.

Proponents of the East River Science Park said they hoped it would induce start-up life sciences companies like Memory Pharmaceuticals, which now has 65 employees, to set up operations in the city.

“There is huge investment in basic research in the life sciences through our medical research institutions, but we have failed to commercialize our science in New York City,” said Kathryn Wylde, president and chief executive of the Partnership for New York City, a nonprofit group composed of 200 chief executives from companies in the city.

“There are about 30 bioscience companies a year coming out of New York institutions, and essentially, they’re all going elsewhere.”

To change that, the partnership’s economic arm contributed $10 million toward creating East River Science Park. The group also worked to enlist the cooperation of an array of top scientific institutions, including Columbia University, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, Mount Sinai Hospital, Rockefeller University, New York University School of Medicine, the Hospital for Special Surgery and Weill Medical College of Cornell University.

Some of the institutions are within a 50-block corridor on the East Side of Manhattan, creating a natural cluster around the planned East River Science Park campus.

“The reason we think New York City is going to be particularly competitive is most other clusters have one or two institutions,” Ms. Wylde said. “Here, we have seven or eight major institutions, so the critical mass of science and of talent is greater here.”

In the life sciences, private businesses often collaborate with research institutes, medical centers and government agencies. The efforts tend to be clustered in a handful of cities, including Boston and Cambridge, Mass., and San Diego.

Laboratories used by life sciences businesses tend to have special features, like higher ceilings, heavier floor-load capacities and advanced mechanical, electrical, ventilation and plumbing systems.

Alexandria Real Estate Equities, a real estate investment trust based in Pasadena, Calif., specializes in this type of development. The company, which is publicly traded, owns 159 properties, encompassing about 11.2 million square feet; six million more square feet are planned.

It is building the East River Science Park as a speculative development, said Joel S. Marcus, the chief executive of Alexandria. The company’s tenants are mainly biotechnology and pharmaceutical businesses, but also include biodefense companies that might, for example, produce a vaccine for anthrax; concerns that develop medical devices; nonprofit organizations; and branches of government agencies and universities.

“We’ve got quite a few clients that we’re going to recruit there, and we’re in discussions with a number of people,” he said. “We’ve got a pretty good handle on the market.” Mr. Marcus said the new center would have dozens of tenants.

Property development in New York City is notoriously expensive, and life sciences space can cost two to four times that of conventional office space to develop.

Alexandria did not have to purchase the land, however. It negotiated a land lease with the city for 49 years with two 25-year options. The parcel holds a parking lot and an old laundry building that is part of the Bellevue Medical Center campus.

Once construction is complete, Alexandria will pay the city $2 million a year, a figure that will escalate over time, said the New York City Economic Development Corporation.

Alexandria will also receive subsidies. Infrastructure work, like relocating a sewer and other utilities and cleaning up the site, will be paid for with $13.9 million from the city, $27 million from the state and possibly $2 million in federal money. There will also be property tax abatement over 25 years worth $251 million, and breaks on city and state sales tax and recording taxes worth about $22.7 million.

That should enable the developer to keep rents at a reasonable level, helping attract start-up companies, said Bill Fair, the managing director of health care and bioscience at the city’s Economic Development Corporation. “What we strongly encouraged Alexandria to do, since it’s on city-owned land, is to make sure the rents are appropriate to allow some percentage of early-stage companies to come into the East River Science Park,” he said.

Lab space that has been fully built out at the Audubon Business and Technology Center, affiliated with Columbia University, is running at $55 a foot; the 100,000-square-foot center is full, with about 16 life sciences companies, said Carol Shuchman, director of commercial leasing and development at Columbia.

The only other complex offering life sciences space in the city is in Brooklyn at the Advanced Biotechnology Park of the State University of New York’s Downstate Medical Center. It currently has about 24,000 square feet of “incubator” space for start-up companies.

Mr. Marcus, Alexandria’s chief, said his company was designing the buildings to attract both start-up and midstage companies, as well as biotech venture capital companies. Besides trying to keep new bioscience companies in the city, Alexandria will also try to recruit companies from the region, as well as pharmaceutical and biotech companies based worldwide.

But even if Alexandria is able to hold down rents to recruit early-stage companies, there is no guarantee that the life sciences will flourish in New York City, said Sheridan Snyder, entrepreneur in residence at Rockefeller University.

Those institutions turn only a tiny percentage of that research into applied science, products and clinical solutions each year, said Mr. Snyder, who founded the biotech company Genzyme in 1981 and has since founded other bioscience businesses.

The East River Science Park “is akin to when the football coach says, ‘I need a new stadium to recruit players,’ ” Mr. Snyder said. “It’s a great step, but there’s so much more than just putting up that building.”

Tuesday, February 20, 2007

Group looks to ‘blight’ Columbia plan - Students, tenants say West Harlem project being developed in secret






Group looks to ‘blight’ Columbia plan
Students, tenants say West Harlem project being developed in secret
by amy zimmer / metro new york
> email this to a friend
FEB 20, 2007

COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY. A group of students unfurled a large banner on a snowy patch of the main campus with the word “blight” written in red. It was a gesture of solidarity by the Student Coalition on Expansion and Gentrification with community members who they then shared the microphone with at a press conference denouncing the university’s plans to develop 17 acres in West Harlem.

Several residents and business owners in that zone are worried the state may designate the area as blighted to seize their property, making way for the $7 billion 30-year plan. Though Columbia has agreed to negotiate a “Community Benefits Agreement” with the West Harlem Local Development Corporation — a group of public housing residents, businesses and elected officials — SCEG members such as Rowan Moore Gerety remain skeptical.

“There’s been a lot of concern about the lack of transparency,” Moore Gerety, a Columbia senior, said. “Being that this is the only legally binding agreement [for the community], we’re concerned they’re going to negotiate in private sessions without public comment.”

Nellie Hester Bailey, co-founder of the Harlem Tenants Council, criticized the CBA as being “tainted from the very beginning” because of the inclusion of elected officials. Columbia’s hiring of Bill Lynch, Democratic strategist and former deputy mayor in the Dinkins administration, “only adds another layer in the conflict of interest.”

Nick Sprayregen, the owner of Tuck-It-Away storage who has five properties in the proposed expansion area, said he would fight any blight designation and claimed that empty buildings with weeds growing through them were owned by Columbia. The school has acquired roughly 80 percent of the 17-acre site.

“There is no affordable housing component of the plan, even though that is a mandate for the Bloomberg administration,” said Sprayregen, who is a member of the local development corporation. He has filed his own application with the city to rezone four of his properties in the footprint from manufacturing to allow for taller buildings to build affordable housing.

“We want to talk about affordable housing and these are things we are doing in private,” said LaVerna Fountain, a Columbia spokeswoman. Though she said the university was “constantly trying to make sure we get the word out,” the community “can’t be involved in every negotiation. We’re talking with businesses and have to be respectful of their privacy.”
Alum effort

Kenny Schaeffer, a Columbia alum who attended the school from 1968 through 1976, is spearheading an alumni campaign against the expansion. The group plans to publish an ad in the Columbia Spectator asking alums to ignore the school’s $4 billion capital campaign to help fund the $7 billion project “until the needs of the community are addressed,” he said.

http://ny.metro.us/metro/local/article/Group_looks_to_blight_Columbia_plan/7044.html

Students Declare South Lawn Blighted

Columbia Spectator
Home > News

Students Declare South Lawn Blighted
Locals and Students Protest Possible Use of Eminent Domain in CU Expansion Zone
By Anna Phillips
Issue date: 2/20/07 Section: News
Media Credit: Aliya Khaki



Standing behind the Sundial yesterday, a gathering of Columbia students and local residents came together to make an unusual statement. Before a small crowd of students and members of the media, they deemed South Lawn, a rectangle of grass on Columbia's campus now buried beneath brown snow, blighted.


"The lawn over there has been seized and declared blighted," said Student Coalition on Expansion and Gentrification member Rowan Moore Gerety, CC '07. "It was not being fully utilized," he said, going on to name the various activities Columbia students and staff use the field for-among them, studying, sports, and heartfelt conversations.


The declaration was a nod to the neighborhood conditions study being conducted by the Empire State Development Corporation, which is being reimbursed for the costs of the study by Columbia. A draft of the General Project Plan for the expansion, prepared by Columbia lawyers, presumed that the study would find the area blighted, paving the way for ESDC to use eminent domain to take property and turn it over to Columbia.


The conditions necessary for a blight finding are not clearly defined by law, but overcrowding, deteriorating buildings, irregularity of plots, crime, lack of sanitation, fire hazards, pollution, and diverse land ownership that makes assembling tracts of property difficult have been among contributing factors in past cases.


The noon event was composed of several community activists such as Coalition to Preserve Community leader Tom DeMott, Harlem Tenants' Council President Nellie Bailey, and Nick Sprayregen, owner of a storage company in Manhattanville. It was a typical crowd of expansion opponents, but this time they were joined by members of the SCEG, most of whom stood behind the speakers holding anti-expansion signs.


Most of the speakers praised the students who stood by them. Community Board 9 member Vicky Gholson addressed those in the audience. "You should not be used as a tool by the administration of Columbia University," she said. "Do not separate yourself from this argument, from this fight."


For all its humor and bite, the blight declaration and protest had little effect on Columbia administrators, who knew of the event weeks in advance. The protestors are "comparing space on a campus that is used by students and administration for events and recreation and ceremonies to an area that, in fact, for some time now, and not just when Columbia began purchasing property there, has had a diminished number of jobs ... I don't know how you can compare that," said Columbia spokeswoman La-Verna Fountain. "About one tenth of one percent of the student body participated," she added.


But Moore Gerety said he was pleased with the student turnout and media attention. "Any publicity that's not coming directly from Columbia's administration is good publicity," he said. DeMott said that upon hearing the students' plans to declare South Lawn blighted, he had laughed. "But it was right on the money," he said. "It had some humor and an echo of protests past."








NB- Dr. Vicky Gholson participated exclusively in her private capacity and any opinions expressed are solely her own and are notto be taken as the represention of any Committee or the Chairman, Officers or membership of Community Board 9 Manhattan.

Monday, February 19, 2007

OSCAR HIJUELOS

Oscar Hijuelos (born in New York City, August 24 1951) is an American novelist. He is the first Hispanic to win a Pulitzer Prize for fiction.

Hijuelos was born in Morningside Heights in WestSide Harlem, New York to Cuban immigrant parents. He studied writing at City College of New York, and practiced various professions before taking up writing full-time.

He currently lives in New York City, and has a contract with Harper Collins.

Bibliography
Our House in the Last World, 1983 (Rome Prize, 1985)
The Mambo Kings Play Songs of Love, 1990 (Pulitzer Prize), the basis for the 1992 motion picture The Mambo Kings (produced as a musical in 2005)
The Fourteen Sisters of Emilio Montez O'Brien, 1993
Mr. Ives' Christmas, 1995
Empress of the Splendid Season, 1999
A Simple Habana Melody, 2002










OSCAR HIJUELOS is a Pulitzer-prize-winning Cuban-American.

His novel Empress of the Splendid Season is set in the neighborhood:
"By the mid-1960's many of the Irish in that neighborhood had left, though several large families remained on 123rd, on the hill around the corner from where Lydia and Raul lived. A new Chinese restaurant went into business near the El train entrance, and over on Amsterdam Avenue a Japanese joint had opened on the first floor of an apartment building near an old Civil-War-era stone water house. Students abounded because of the universities, City College to the north, and to the south Columbia and Barnard ("Barnyard").
In those days they still mainly stayed in campus housing, the males, for the most part, crew-cutted and wholesome seeming, the females, teacherly. Gradually there had appeared scruffy young people, who sometimes stood in front of the subway kiosks, handing out mimeographed sheets of poetry or asking for money..."

"One afternoon in the spring of 1968, during the time of the famous university riots, a college girl, wandering lost in the cavernous and winding recesses of a many-stairwelled building at the edge of a campus "occupied" -- liberated -- by rebellious students, had nearly been raped, or so she had claimed, by three local youths... The riots had brought more and more police around, especially by the university campus, these policemen stopping people for no particular reason, like Raul, on his way to visit Martinez, an old school friend who lived over on Amsterdam on the other side of the school. They were Tactical Police Force officers, who at that point had endured weeks of tension, standing in at-the-ready formation in riot gear and with Roman-looking shields poised before them, along certain points on upper Broadway and in various places around the campus."

"Irritable and vindictive, they couldn't really give a damn about the complaints of one of them, for they (rightly) lumped her in with the bourgeois kids who'd started the trouble over a deserted piece of shit, glass-strewn university property in Morningside Park in West Harlem. The university's plan to clear away several acres of granite and shale and thickets of poison oak to build an athletic field (it is there now, just off 110th Street and Manhattan Avenue) had outraged the radical students, though few of these kids, in the ordinary course of their life at the university, wouldn't have been caught dead in that place, or anywhere else in the park, unless by accident..."

"The 'community' itself -- that is, the working people of Harlem and the West Side -- were not really involved, nor was their opinion solicited; rather, in the manner of the upper class, the radicals declared that the project would be exploitative of the people, that it was yet another example of racism, as the university leadership was white and much of the community was black and Hispanic. Assuming the righteousness of their cause, the radicals sought agreement with what they had already decided upon. Street protests against the Vietnam War, ROTC on campus, and university ownership of armament company stocks melded with the cause of community rights. In the name of liberation, students went on strike, closing down the school and occupying many of the campus buildings."

"The people in Lydia's neighborhood were against the war and for civil rights, but beyond that they were not really a part of the glory and heroism of the movement. Pamphlets were handed out on every street corner, public high-school kids were bussed in to protest (without knowing what they were protesting), condemnations of the university and the government were shouted through megaphones; a multitude of reporters roamed looking for interesting radicals to interview, while folks like Lydia and Raul, walking home, tired from work, went ignored..."

"In any event, during the strikes, which had lasted for most of the semester, it was the habit of local kids to invade the campus, attending radical rallies and dances. When the students began to occupy different buildings, shut off from the outside world, the locals found ways to get inside. Because the students had an easy enough time bringing food, money, booze, and whatever else they needed into the occupied buildings, (hanging from cord out windows were picnic baskets into which passersby on Amsterdam or Broadway could toss money or drugs or cigarettes for the cause), there was much to eat and drink; jugs of cheap wine and beer were everywhere.
Some of the kids went for the young college girls, for this was the time of free love, others out of pure boredom, and some, like Johnny, went because fancy electric typewriters (IBM Selectrics being state of the art and not too heavy to carry) and the occasional radio and guitar were his lucre. Caring little about the politics of the situation, and suspending their prejudices, the poor neighborhood kids were thrilled to partake in the rich kids' world (the pussy). They would go there with the expectations and high hopes of children visiting a theme park..."

"With the passage of years the university had put up new and ghastly buildings in the neighborhood, a law school and a school of international affairs, among others, and modern sculptures so breathtakingly ugly that passersby and time-time residents of the neighborhood were immediately depressed; and the constructed all manner of blocky high-rise student housing, demolishing many a tenement (out with the past, upward and onward with the future!) and raising the rents so high that businesses like Eliseo's cafe were forced to close. Eliseo began to sell books on Broadway, and every so often Lydia, taking a walk, would stop by to see him...
Six days a week he showed up with a shopping cart filled with books he had scavenged here and there in the neighborhood, spread two sheets on the sidewalk in front of a church on 113th Street and Broadway, and covered them with his merchandise. He also sold magazines and phonograph albums and in this manner, just got by."

Saturday, February 17, 2007

Judge Limits New York Police Taping - New York Times





Judge Limits New York Police Taping
By JIM DWYER
Published: February 16, 2007


In a rebuke of a surveillance practice greatly expanded by the New York Police Department after the Sept. 11 attacks, a federal judge ruled yesterday that the police must stop the routine videotaping of people at public gatherings unless there is an indication that unlawful activity may occur.


Skip to next paragraph
RelatedText of the Decision (pdf)
The Empire Zone Blog: Court Case Primeval
Police Infiltrate Protests, Videotapes Show (Dec. 22, 2005)
Video: N.Y.C. Police Surveillance

Four years ago, at the request of the city, the same judge, Charles S. Haight Jr., gave the police greater authority to investigate political, social and religious groups.


In yesterday’s ruling, Judge Haight, of United States District Court in Manhattan, found that by videotaping people who were exercising their right to free speech and breaking no laws, the Police Department had ignored the milder limits he had imposed on it in 2003.


Citing two events in 2005 — a march in Harlem and a demonstration by homeless people in front of the home of Mayor Michael R. Bloomberg — the judge said the city had offered scant justification for videotaping the people involved.


“There was no reason to suspect or anticipate that unlawful or terrorist activity might occur,” he wrote, “or that pertinent information about or evidence of such activity might be obtained by filming the earnest faces of those concerned citizens and the signs by which they hoped to convey their message to a public official.”


While he called the police conduct “egregious,” Judge Haight also offered an unusual judicial mea culpa, taking responsibility for his own words in a 2003 order that he conceded had not been “a model of clarity.”


The restrictions on videotaping do not apply to bridges, tunnels, airports, subways or street traffic, Judge Haight noted, but are meant to control police surveillance at events where people gather to exercise their rights under the First Amendment.


“No reasonable person, and surely not this court, is unaware of the perils the New York public faces and the crucial importance of the N.Y.P.D.’s efforts to detect, prevent and punish those who would cause others harm,” Judge Haight wrote.


Jethro M. Eisenstein, one of the lawyers who challenged the videotaping practices, said that Judge Haight’s ruling would make it possible to contest other surveillance tactics, including the use of undercover officers at political gatherings. In recent years, police officers have disguised themselves as protesters, shouted feigned objections when uniformed officers were making arrests, and pretended to be mourners at a memorial event for bicycle riders killed in traffic accidents.


“This was a major push by the corporation counsel to say that the guidelines are nice but they’re yesterday’s news, and that the security establishment’s view of what is important trumps civil liberties,” Mr. Eisenstein said. “Judge Haight is saying that’s just not the way we’re doing things in New York City.”


A spokesman for Police Commissioner Raymond W. Kelly referred questions about the ruling to the city’s lawyers, who noted that Judge Haight did not set a deadline for destroying the tapes it had already made, and that the judge did not find the city had violated the First Amendment.
Nevertheless, Judge Haight — at times invoking the mythology of the ancient Greeks and of Harold Ross, the founding editor of The New Yorker — used blunt language to characterize the Police Department’s activities.


“There is no discernible justification for the apparent disregard of the guidelines” in his 2003 court order, he said. These spell out the broad circumstances under which the police could investigate political gatherings.


Under the guidelines, the police may conduct investigations — including videotaping — at political events only if they have indications that unlawful activity may occur, and only after they have applied for permission to the deputy commissioner in charge of the Intelligence Division.


Judge Haight noted that the Police Department had not produced
evidence that any applications for permission to videotape had ever been filed.


Near the end of his 51-page order, the judge warned that the Police Department must change its practices or face penalties.


“Any future use by the N.Y.P.D. of video and photographic equipment during the course of an investigation involving political activity” that did not follow the guidelines could result in contempt proceedings, he wrote.


At monthly group bicycle rides in Lower Manhattan known as Critical Mass, some participants break traffic laws, and the police routinely videotape those events, Judge Haight noted. That would be an appropriate situation for taping, he said, but police officials did not follow the guidelines and apply for permission.


“This is a classic case of application of the guidelines: political activity on the part of individuals, but legitimate law enforcement purpose on the part of the police,” Judge Haight wrote. “It is precisely the sort of situation where the guidelines require adherence to certain protocols but ultimately give the N.Y.P.D. the flexibility to pursue its law enforcement goals.”


Gideon Oliver, a lawyer who has represented many people arrested during the monthly bicycle rides, said he was troubled by the intensive scrutiny of political activities.


“I’m looking forward to a deeper and more serious exploration of how and why this surveillance has been conducted,” Mr. Oliver said.


In the past the Police Department has said that it needed intelligence about the Critical Mass rides in order to protect the streets from unruly riders.


Patrick Markee, an official with another group that was cited in the ruling, the Coalition for the Homeless, said the judge’s decision ratified their basic rights to free speech.


“We’re gratified that Judge Haight found that the police shouldn’t engage in surveillance of homeless New Yorkers and their supporters when they’re engaged in peaceful, lawful political protest,” Mr. Markee said.


The Police Department’s approach to investigating political, social and religious groups has been a contentious subject for most of four decades, and a class action lawsuit brought by political activists, including a lawyer named Barbara Handschu, was settled in 1985. Judge Haight oversees the terms of that settlement, which are known as the Handschu guidelines, and which he modified in 2003.


At the time, Judge Haight said that the police could “attend any event open to the public, on the same terms and conditions of the public generally.”


But in yesterday’s ruling, he said that permission “cannot be stretched to authorize police officers to videotape everyone at a public gathering just because a visiting little old lady from Dubuque (to borrow from The New Yorker) could do so. There is a quantum difference between a police officer and the little old lady (or other tourist or private citizen) videotaping or photographing a public event.”


The judge said he bore some responsibility for misinterpretation of the guidelines.


“I confess with some chagrin that while the text of this opinion and its implementing order, read together, may not be as opaque as the irritatingly baffling pronouncements of the Oracle” at Delphi, “they do not constitute a model of clarity,” he wrote