Sunday, January 21, 2007

As East Harlem Develops, Its Accent Starts to Change

The New York Times

As East Harlem Develops, Its Accent Starts to Change
By TIMOTHY WILLIAMS and TANZINA VEGA
Published: January 21, 2007

Inside a wooden shack set in a garden on East 117th Street, a group of Puerto Rican men, many of them in their 70s and 80s, are playing a spirited game of dominoes on a rainy winter afternoon. A painting of a woman wearing a burgundy shawl over a flamenco-style dress hangs on a wall, and in the garden, tomatoes, peppers, corn and culantro, an herb used in Caribbean cooking, grow in the summer.

Skip to next paragraph
Multimedia
Graphic

Enlarge This Image

Chang W. Lee/The New York Times
Work under way on East 117th Street
between First and Pleasant Avenues
.

Multimedia
javascript:pop_me_up2('http://www.nytimes.com/imagepages/2007/01/21/nyregion/20070121_EAST_GRAPHIC.html', '682_565', 'width=682,height=565,location=no,scrollbars=yes,toolbars=no,resizable=yes')

A Puerto Rican Enclave


Ozier Muhammad/The New York Times
Rafael Merino, a community board
member, says that that East Harlem
is in crisis mode over keeping its Puerto
Rican identity.

Enlarge This Image
Ozier Muhammad/The New York Times
A renovation at East 116th Street and
Pleasant Avenue; a Home Depot is
expected to be built not far away.

But outside their little retreat, a thick dust, the pounding of hammers and the shouts of construction workers inundate the block, signaling the transformation of East Harlem, also known as Spanish Harlem or El Barrio (the neighborhood). Many see it changing from the Puerto Rican enclave it has been for decades to a more heterogeneous neighborhood with a significant middle-class presence, luxury condominiums and a Home Depot.

It is a familiar story of gentrification in New York City, but this one comes with a twist: the many newcomers who are middle-class professionals from other parts of the city are joining a growing number of working-class Mexicans and Dominicans.

The result is a high degree of angst among many Puerto Ricans who worry they will be unable to prevent their displacement from a neighborhood that is far more than a place to live and work. “We’re in crisis mode right now, and as far as retaining the Puerto Rican and Latino identity in the neighborhood, we’re in red alert,” said Rafael Merino, who is on the local community board. “If we don’t pick up speed, we’ll lose a lot of it.”

While East Harlem — which had previously been an Italian neighborhood — was not the first place Puerto Ricans settled after arriving in large numbers in New York after World War II, it became the de facto center of cultural life after large-scale displacement from Chelsea,
Hell’s Kitchen, the Upper West Side, and more recently, Williamsburg and the Lower East Side.

East Harlem is the place where people come to celebrate Three Kings Day and quinceañeras, to gather the night before the Puerto Rican Day Parade, and to play dominoes on weekends.

But in recent years, rising rents have caused many Puerto Ricans to leave for more affordable Hudson Valley towns, or for cities like Allentown and Bethlehem in Pennsylvania and Stamford and Bridgeport in Connecticut.

“You have a choice, try to pay that rent, or move out,” said Tony Ramirez, a plumber who has lived in East Harlem for 43 of his 47 years. “Puerto Ricans in El Barrio is like being extinct. None of the people I grew up with are around. People feel like strangers in their own town.”

An illustration of his lament can be seen on several blocks of 116th Street, long Puerto Rican East Harlem’s main shopping strip, which are now filled with shops selling Mexican food, flags and pastries.

In 1980, there were 856,440 people of Puerto Rican descent living in New York City, compared with 787,046 in 2005, according to census data.

In East Harlem, the number of Puerto Ricans has also been declining, to 37,878 in 2005, from 40,542 in 1990, according to the census. They now make up about 35.3 percent of the neighborhood’s population, down from 39.4 percent in 1990.

Carmen Vasquez, public relations manager for Hope Community Inc., a private, nonprofit real estate and cultural organization in the neighborhood, said that the concentration of public housing and other low-income apartment units in East Harlem would keep the Puerto Rican population stable for now.

“There will be some displacement, but we will retain our heritage and our culture,” she said. “You won’t stop gentrification, but you can contain it and slow it down.”
But the changes are unmistakable.

For decades, there had been no doubt about where the Upper East Side ended and East Harlem began: 96th Street, the last major east-west street before the start of East Harlem’s clusters of high-rise public housing projects.

Taxi drivers sometimes dropped off passengers at 96th Street rather than venture farther north to what they considered to be a crime-ridden area. Some courier services also refused to cross the line. Even the row of upscale shops along Second and Third Avenues stopped just short of 96th Street.

That demarcation line is softer now, and nicknames for the southern tier of East Harlem abound: the Upper Upper East Side, Upper Yorkville and SpaHa — short for Spanish Harlem.

Peter Lorusso, 25, who works for a shipping company, has lived for about a year in the Aspen, a 234-unit luxury apartment complex at 101st Street and First Avenue, where one-half of the units rent at market rates.

The three-year-old building has its own garage with valet parking and a 10,000-foot courtyard with bamboo trees. It also offers a free shuttle van every 20 minutes to nearby subways during the morning and evening commutes — as do several other new upscale buildings in the neighborhood.

Mr. Lorusso said he does not usually go north of 101st Street. Instead, he and his friends “do the pub crawl” on the Upper East Side along Second Avenue. The Aspen, he said, is “an extension of the Upper East Side.”

“People are bringing more money north, which is a good thing,” he said. “You just got to be street smart.”

Jon Rich, 30, a stockbroker who lives in the Aspen, had previously rented apartments in TriBeCa, Battery Park City and Midtown. He now splits the $2,800 rent for his two-bedroom apartment with a roommate. “I couldn’t afford to stay where I was,” he said.

Fifteen blocks north of the Aspen, on the site of the former Washburn Wire Factory at 116th Street and the Franklin D. Roosevelt Drive, workers have dismantled the plant to make way for the $300 million East River Plaza shopping center, which will feature a Home Depot, a Best Buy and a Target store.

A second large development in the area was derailed by the Bloomberg administration last year after widespread opposition. The $1 billion project, known as Uptown New York, had called for retail space and 1,500 apartments in an area between 125th and 127th Streets and Second and Third Avenues. Eighty percent of the apartments would have been rented or sold at market rates.

Still, residents say many of East Harlem’s new residential developments are unreasonably expensive. On 117th Street between First and Pleasant Avenues — a block that the police say has been home to a thriving drug market and where two people were killed in the past six months —more than eight buildings are being renovated or constructed.

One of the buildings is the Nina, nine units of “luxury condominiums” where a one-bedroom penthouse is on the market for $850,000.

“The Upper East Side is now the playground for the sophisticated bohemian,” reads the Nina’s Web site. “East Harlem will be known as the area that will feature SoHo-type lofts, with a NoHo sensibility, and a Village flair, without the hefty price tag.”

Jose Hidalgo, 76, one of the men playing dominoes in the shack on 117th Street next door to the Nina, has lived in the neighborhood for 55 years. He grew up in Santa Isabel, Puerto Rico.

“Where am I going to live with these people and their condominiums?” he asked. “If I have to leave, I’ll go back to my country. I don’t have to pay rent; and I have a house there.” But Mr. Hidalgo said he believes that even if the new condos and co-ops find buyers, their owners won’t stay.

“These people come here and they don’t last long,” Mr. Hidalgo said. “Once they see what the neighborhood is really like, especially in the summer,” he said, when the streets become noisy and the crime rate typically climbs, they will sell their apartments and leave.
His friend, Jose Vazquez, 65, who has lived in East Harlem since 1959, said poor people are going to be forced out. “People who used to pay $600 a month are now paying $900 a month.”

But Henry M. Calderon, a real estate broker and president of the East Harlem Chamber of Commerce, said some Puerto Ricans believe they are entitled to live in East Harlem, although they failed to buy property when it was cheaper.

“Is it a right to live here or a privilege?” Mr. Calderon asked. “Is it a right to have an apartment facing Park Avenue? We cannot expect that we have a right to live where we want to live.”

Nicholas L. Arture, executive director of the Association of Hispanic Arts and treasurer of the East Harlem Board of Tourism, said even without significant rates of Puerto Rican home ownership, one way to preserve the area’s pedigree is to market it to visitors. One plan calls for transforming 106th Street east of Fifth Avenue into a “cultural corridor” showcasing Puerto Rican heritage through murals and cultural centers, art galleries and restaurants.

Mr. Arture said the area’s Puerto Rican flavor has already attracted visitors who want to know more about the neighborhood. Recently, a group of graduate students from Kenya said they wanted to visit after having read about the neighborhood on the Internet. “They wanted to eat rice and beans,” Mr. Arture said. “They wanted to experience the culture.”

Columbia, play nice

New York Daily News

Columbia, play nice

In plan to expand, a dialogue could turn foes to friends

With Brooklyn's Atlantic Yards project finally moving forward, it seems like the men and women working on the city's next mega-project - Columbia University's plan to build a major research campus in the Manhattanville section of West Harlem - have learned nothing from what happened in Brooklyn. Instead of working full time to arrive at a shared vision in a spirit of mutual compromise, Columbia and many local leaders in West Harlem appear poised to square off in a tangle of lawsuits, protests and accusations.

After years of quietly acquiring land and buildings in the mostly industrial corridor west of Broadway between 125th and 133rd Sts., Columbia announced ambitious plans to build a new research facility, dormitories and community amenities like a Bryant Park-style open greenspace and a state-of-the-art high school. To do so, the city will have to rezone the area, which is currently designated for manufacturing.

All well and good. But the university - which owns about 85% of all the property in the project area - has refused to rule out the tactic of asking the state government to acquire the remaining parcels on behalf of the university by the use of eminent domain, forcing holdouts to sell even if they don't want to.

That makes Nick Sprayregen's blood boil. The 43-year-old owner of Tuck-it-Away, a self-storage warehouse, operates a family business - based in West Harlem for more than 25 years - that includes ownership of half a dozen properties in the area Columbia wants to develop.
Dozens of Columbia students store their belongings with Sprayregen, and so do various academic departments and the university bookstore. His business will be more needed than ever as the school expands.

Sprayregen has been trying for more than a year to work out some kind of deal with Columbia, but has been unable to get a meeting with anybody.

"If Columbia somehow ends up with 85% of what they want, they can still build a wonderful campus," says Sprayregen. "But this is not a business I can just move elsewhere. It's not necessary for them to strong-arm every last person."

In fact, it's not necessary for Columbia to strong-arm anybody. As developer Bruce Ratner proved with Atlantic Yards, an early round of talks with legitimate, longstanding community leaders can calm fears and serve as an important gesture of good faith toward local residents.
Ratner cut creative deals with groups like ACORN that had a constituency and a track record - and ended up committing to building more than 2,200 units of subsidized apartments at Atlantic Yards. Brooklyn Assemblyman Hakeem Jeffries stepped forward at the last minute and won an agreement from Ratner to build 200 units of subsidized homes that people will own.

Columbia should be engaged in active dialogue with Sprayregen and other West Harlem stakeholders, but the university has chosen - at the request of the Bloomberg administration - to start the city's land-use clock ticking before negotiating with community groups. That means neighborhood people will have only about nine months to arrive at whatever deal they can, in a high-pressure atmosphere that's already creating resentment.

"They have this all-or-nothing concept," says Sprayregen, who has hired civil rights attorney Norman Siegel to look into possible legal action to block Columbia - an early sign that the university's hard-nose strategy isn't working.

The city's political and business leaders need to step up as soon as possible to head off a fight that doesn't need to happen.

Originally published on January 21, 2007

Saturday, January 20, 2007

Cuba: Why I Care

Cuba: Why I Care
By Claudia Fanelli 1/20/2007

I am not Cuban. I don’t attempt or pretend to be. I am Italian-American, the granddaughter of economic, not political, immigrants. As a result of my background, the concept of political immigration was foreign to me until I met my Cuban-born Spanish professors in college twenty years ago.

Even so, knowing them as well as I did but never discussing their ordeals, I had only marginal knowledge of Cuban history. With regard to the Cuban exile experience, well, let’s just say that if I didn’t hear it from Tony Montana, then I didn’t know about it. My ignorance was never questioned much since I live in Pennsylvania where the Cuban population is sparse.

However, now that Cuban history and literature are part of the high school Spanish curriculum where I teach, I felt compelled to know more than what the student textbook told me. Books, Blogs, movies, documentaries and talking to Cubans have helped me to understand what is so seemingly foreign a concept to the average American: the current situation in Cuba.

Other teachers ask me questions about Cuba and while I am in no way an authority, I do my best and get an answer if I don’t have one. You see, my colleagues have no clue about what is going on in Cuba, and until I began talking to them, they really didn’t care to know. Perhaps they are relieved that I keep abreast of what is taking place so that they don’t have to. After all, Cuba is barely a blip on the radar of most Americans.

I am always sure to inform the curious about the suffering and the human rights violations that are taking place in Cuba as a result of a 48-year death grip on the country and her people. I cite my sources when I need to and I state statistics when challenged by a fan of Fidel. Once presented with the propaganda espoused by Hollywood and parroted by those who swallow it, I unload the litany of contradictions as well as the endless list of human and civil rights violations that people who don’t live in Miami either don’t know or choose not to acknowledge.

More and more frequently, someone will ask me “Why do you care so much about Cuba? We don’t even have Cubans around here.” I have no agenda. I don’t have Cubans in my family and my closest exile friend died this summer, taking with her the stories of what happened to her in Cuba that she couldn’t bring herself to share. I’m just an American who wants to see freedom established in a country that Americans clamor to visit clandestinely without regard to what is actually taking place there.

Now it’s true, where I live Cuban-sightings are few and far between, but yet only an hour away is Union City, NJ, where a huge population of Cubans live, and New York City is just a stone’s throw from there. It’s hard to stay provincial once you are aware of the fact that people who left behind everything they owned, risked being jailed or killed or who made the ultimate sacrifice of sending their children by themselves (14,000 of them to be exact) to another country to escape the hell of their own, live sixty measly miles from here. One would think that I shouldn’t have to justify why I “care” about Cuba. Why should I care about a country in such close proximity to us that their people try to swim to get here after their makeshift rafts fall apart in the sea?

Why should I care about a country where the citizens are denied the simple freedom of using the same hotels and restaurants as the tourists? At a mere 90 miles away from here, how can I say that I don’t care?

Engaging in a “Why do you care?” discussion means keeping a calm head, for I must make my points rationally, removing emotion from the argument so that I don’t lose my cool. The problem is that now I am emotionally invested in this issue: I am disgusted, infuriated and heartsick about what I know takes place on the island. This makes remaining calm in the face of people who think communism is a good system or that fidel Castro is “misunderstood.”

But perhaps the most frustrating conversations take place with those who are apathetic. “They’re not our people,” I have been told. “Not “our” people?” I ask. “Were the Ethiopians “our” people? Americans recorded music and sponsored Live Aid to help the poor and oppressed there. Were the Bosnians “our” people? Americans went to fight ethnic cleansing for them and there was nary a protest that they weren’t “our” people.

Were the victims of the tsunami in Thailand “our” people? Americans donated money from their own pockets to help them. Since when do others have to be “our” people for us to care about humanity? And by “care,” I don’t mean take to the streets and burn Castro in effigy or protest the regime; I don’t expect that. I just mean not being apathetic.

Why should caring about the people suffering in a brutal, oppressive dictatorship that is so close to the USA be any different from being concerned about Darfur, Thailand, Indonesia, or anywhere else? And if anything, we should care MORE because we have an enormous population of Cubans living right here on OUR SOIL- which is now THEIR SOIL. Perhaps that is the problem.

People see how Cubans have prospered here (over 125,000 Cuban-American owned business in the US), how much they have contributed to society and the economy (over 26 billion dollars are generated by their businesses annually) and how they have made their own way, even though they arrived with the clothes on their backs. Maybe they just assume that Cubans were good to go from the moment they arrived so life in Cuba can’t be that bad after all; ergo, Cubans don’t really suffer.

“Castro isn’t that bad… he won a Human Rights Award- that must mean something,” some uninformed people have told me. “Do you know who awarded him that award?” I ask, a little giddy to reveal the award sponsor. “Moammar Gadhafi, you know, from LIBYA?” “Oh,” is usually the response to that. Conversation over.

Nobody is going to defend Gadhafi. No wonder people don’t care about Cuba- if Castro has a human rights award in his possession, everything must be right with the world! Far from deserving human rights awards, Cuba’s totalitarian dictator has a long list of violations against both human and civil rights. I don’t know about anyone else, but when I heard that the Cuban government has Decree 988 which says that "executions can be carried out in less than 48 hours, without trial,” I scratch my head and wonder where the international out crying is.

Death without trial?

In Philadelphia, convicted cop-killer Mumia Abdul Jamal got his trial and was sentenced to death and the liberal left in Hollywood went ballistic trying to get him off death row, where he has been for twenty-four years. But to be put to death within 2 days and not get a trial and nobody makes a scene? Hollywood has the biggest bully pulpit in the world and yet nobody says a word about Cuba, and the Hollywood elite continue to visit Cuba and revere it as if it were paradise on earth. How am I expected to wrap my mind around that?

The Cuban American National Foundation stated that in 1992, there were 266,000 men, women and children in 241 prisons and concentration camps and there were 54,000 Cubans dead for political reasons, including 12,486 killed by firing squads. Keep in mind that these statistics are fifteen years old- I shudder to think how high the total is today.

Should this not bother me?

Why do I care that “only” 52,000 rafters tried to escape Cuba and out of those, 17,000 were successful? (That begs the question, what happened to the other 35,000 rafters?)

Where are Susan Sarandon and Ed Asner? Has anyone told Oliver Stone about these figures? Is Hollywood so enamored with Castro that they can just ignore these heinous crimes against humanity?

Castro puts to death thousands upon thousands of people who dare not to tow the Communist party line, yet Hollywood embraces this man? Am I the only non-Cuban who cares about this?

Do I have to be Cuban to care? Or is the majority of the country so provincial that what happens outside of their own town is not important unless a loudmouth Hollywood type says it is?

I think that Hollywood’s romantic notion of the revolution and its leader have contributed to the American apathy toward our neighbor in the Caribbean. After all, it was Hollywood, not Cuba, that produced such films as Havana, Motorcycle Diaries, Comandante and the upcoming Che.

If the apathetic population of the United States really thinks that because Cubans here are successful or are jealous of them and therefore cannot muster up enough concern for humanity to give Cuba a second thought, they might want to consider the stats.

U.S Census data shows that in the first fifteen years after Castro took power, over 640,000 people fled the island. The total for over forty years of Castro’s regime has passed 1.5 million people. Not all of these were affluent like those who left the island soon after Castro took over.

Rather, these were the people for whom Castro had supposedly created the “Revolution,” the working man, the poor, the oppressed. If he had done right by them, why would they be leaving en masse? In 1994 when he announced that anyone who wanted to leave could do so, 35,000 people tried to raft their way to the US.

Try to understand that- people crafted makeshift rafts and hopped on them, pushed off into the ocean, not knowing if they would live or die, just for freedom. These people were the regular people, desperate to escape death squads, ration cards, denial of freedom of speech and a ban on religion.

These were the people who, when faced with the idea of “Socialismo o Muerte,” chose death. Death by drowning, death by sharks, death by dehydration… Yep, Cuba must be a real paradise if these choices trumped life on the island. And why should I care? I think the question should be “Why shouldn’t I?”

Manning the 'Church of the Presidents'

Click here: Manning the 'Church of the Presidents' Christianpost.com- Christian News Online , Christian World News
http://www.christianpost.com/article/20070120/25296_Manning_the_%27Church_of_the_Presidents%27.htm

The Christian Post

Manning the 'Church of the Presidents'
By Ann Sanner
Associated Press Writer
Sat, Jan. 20 2007 09:08 AM ET

WASHINGTON (AP) - The Rev. Luis Leon may be one of the few people President Bush routinely looks up to.

Enlarge this Image

(Photo: AP / Manuel Balce Ceneta)
President Bush, right, talks with
Rev. Luis Leon, after attending a
church service at St. John's Church
in Washington in this Sept. 10, 2006
file photo.

When Bush looked up to him from a pew at St. John's Episcopal Church one recent Sunday, the message that came down from the chancel steps bore a striking resemblance to one that dominates secular Washington as well.

It was about the difficulty of making adjustments in one's life. "It requires the will to change," Leon preached, the Book of Common Prayer tucked under his left arm, his right hand pointing toward parishioners. "It requires the courage to acknowledge that you want to change, to change your direction."

Was he preaching to the president in the weeks before Bush announced the changes in his Iraq policy? No, Leon said firmly in a recent interview. "I never preach to the president. I preach to the congregation."

"My rule of thumb has been that he gets what everybody else gets and hope that some of it speaks to him."

When Bush attends, he sits nine rows back at St. John's, his church of choice and by tradition the "Church of the Presidents," just across Lafayette Square from the White House.

He listens to a priest who made an improbable journey to its pulpit.

Born in Guantanamo, Cuba, Leon came to the United States at 11, alone and without his parents as one of the "Pedro Pan" flights bearing children fleeing the island nation. He had a toothbrush, a few pieces of clothing and $3 when he landed in Miami, and he spent the next years in foster care. His mother arrived when he was a teenager, but he never saw his father again.'

Bush, like many of his predecessors, sits in pew No. 54, which is marked by small brass plaque reading "The Presidents' Pew." The choice was President Madison's.

Every president since has attended at least occasional services at the pale yellow church.

"There would be a temptation in a church like that to play 'civil religion,' in other words to be a chaplain to the establishment," said the Rev. Kevin Bean, who worked with Leon at Trinity Church in Wilmington, Del. "But that's not Luis' style."

"He's political, but he's not partisan," Bean said of Leon's sermons. "He's civil, but he's not soft. He has part of the fiery Latino in him, which is a good thing."

Bush was raised Presbyterian, became an Episcopalian and now is a United Methodist. The president prefers an early service, a little more than a half hour, no music. When he and the first lady attend services together, they greet people in line for Communion and shake hands with congregants, but otherwise draw little attention.

The Episcopal Church's views differ from those of Bush on some controversial issues. For example, the church opposes a constitutional amendment that would prohibit same-sex marriages and supports abortion rights.Yet, Leon and Bush get along well.

In 2003, the Bushes threw him a dinner party at the White House to celebrate his 25 years as a priest, said Thais Villanueva, Leon's cousin who was among family members and friends attending the event.

"The president was pretty casual with Luis," Villanueva said.

Bush chose Leon to deliver the prayer at his second presidential inauguration in 2005. The two frequently chat after Sunday services. Leon's sermons are written before he finds out whether the president is attending morning service. "I don't change anything because the president's coming," he said. Nor does he refrain from speaking about topics that might conflict with Bush's views.

"He knows that I've traveled to Cuba. That's not something that the administration favors," he said.

While he doesn't tailor his sermons, he's certainly aware of the face in the crowd. He finds preaching to the president daunting.

"You never get used to it," Leon told The Associated Press in May 2002. "You get very nervous, because the person sitting in the pew carries such responsibilities, but ultimately I don't ever change what I'm going to say." Leon, 57, started his ministry at St. John's in 1994.

As the church's first Hispanic leader, he established a Spanish language service. He was a rector at churches in Paterson, N.J., and Wilmington before coming to St. John's. A wine enthusiast, Leon once co-wrote a column on wine for The (Baltimore) Evening Sun. He picked up the interest after drinking a 1970 Bordeaux with a member of his church in Charlotte, N.C., in 1977.

"The moment I tasted it, I said, 'This is not what I've been drinking. What is this stuff?'" he recalled. Although he doesn't shy away from issues in his sermons, Leon tries to avoid making people the target of criticism. "My intention is never to scold anybody during a sermon," he said. "So you have to invite people to consider something. And that's what I try to do."

Copyright © 2007 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. The information contained in the AP News report may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed without the prior written authority of The Associated Press.

Friday, January 19, 2007

City Council Calendar for Monday Jan. 22nd, 2007 - Sunday Jan. 28th, 2007

NYC Council Legislative Update wrote:



Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2007 15:14:01 -0500 (EST)
From: NYC Council Legislative Update
To: reysmont@yahoo.com
Subject: City Council Calendar for Monday Jan. 22nd, 2007 - Sunday Jan. 28th, 2007

City Council Calendar for Monday Jan. 22nd, 2007 - Sunday Jan. 28th, 2007

- - - - - - Community Conversations on the Budget - - - - - - -
In addition to legislative hearings held at City Hall, the Council is holding meetings in every borough for individuals to identify their community's needs and priorities. Also note that Budget ideas may be emailed directly to Speaker Quinn at: http://www.nyccouncil.info/rightnow/contactspkr.cfm?issue=budget

This week's meetings include:
Brooklyn Community Conversation Meeting
Wednesday, January 24th, 7:00pm
New Life Tabernacle, 4905 Avenue D
More info at http://www.nyccouncil.info/


- - - - - - Strengthening Community / Police Relations - - - - - - -

The Council is undertaking steps to strengthen the relationship between communities and the New York City Police Department (NYPD), including citywide town hall meetings. Next week's meeting are:

Bronx: Monday, January 22nd from 6:00 pm - 8:00 pm Richard Green Elementary School

Manhattan: Tuesday, January 23rd from 6:00 pm - 8:00 pm Harlem Hospital

RSVP to 212-788-9221 or workingtogether@council.nyc.ny.us

Speaker Quinn may also be emailed on this issue at http://www.nyccouncil.info/rightnow/contactspkr.cfm?issue=police


- - - - - - - Legislative Calendar - - - - - - - -

** Meetings for Monday, January 22, 2007 **

Civil Service & Labor
1:00 PM, Committee Room - City Hall
Oversight - Biometric Palm Print Scanners

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

** Meetings for Tuesday, January 23, 2007 **

-- no public meetings scheduled --

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

** Meetings for Wednesday, January 24, 2007 **

Joint Meeting. Committees on: Public Safety; Civil Rights 10:00 AM, Council Chambers - City Hall Oversight - Undercover and Specialized Operations Training in the Police Department.

Committee(s) on: Small Business
1:00 PM, Committee Room - City Hall
Oversight - Small Businesses and Alternatives to High Property Taxes

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

** Meetings for Thursday, January 25, 2007 **

Transportation
10:00 AM, Council Chambers - City Hall
Int. 199 - A Local Law to amend the administrative code of the city of New York, in relation to modifying department of transportation performance targets and indicators towards the goal of reducing traffic congestion citywide.

Committee(s) on: Education
1:00 PM, Council Chambers - City Hall
Oversight - The Mayor's 2007 Education Reform Initiatives

Joint Meeting. Committee(s) on: Health; Technology in Government 1:00 PM, Hearing Room - 250 Broadway, 14th Floor Oversight - Implementing Health Information Technology in Primary Care Settings.

Cultural Affairs, Libraries & International Intergroup Relations 1:00 PM, Hearing Room - 250 Broadway, 16th Floor Oversight - Update on New York City's Film Industry and the activities of the Office of Film, Theater and Broadcasting

Committee(s) on: Higher Education
2:00 PM, Committee Room - City Hall
Oversight - Child Care Services on CUNY Campuses

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

** Meetings for Friday, January 26, 2007 **

Committee(s) on: Consumer Affairs
10:00 AM, Committee Room - City Hall
Int. 81 - By Council Members Gioia, Fidler, Foster, Gentile, Martinez, Nelson, Weprin and Liu - A Local Law to amend the administrative code of the city of New York, in relation to the consumer bill of rights regarding tax preparers.

Environmental Protection
10:00 AM, Committee Room - City Hall
Oversight - The City's PLANYC 2030 sustainability goal to "reduce global warning emissions by more than 30%" and how best to achieve it.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

** Meetings for Saturday, January 24, 2007 **

-- no public meetings scheduled --

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

** Meetings for Sunday, January 25, 2007 **

-- no public meetings scheduled --

More Information at http://www.nyccouncil.info/rightnow/calendarpage.cfm


This is the NYC.gov news you requested for: Council Legislative Calendar Email Updates

Note: The City Council Calendar list serve is now being powered by NYC.gov

To unsubscribe, please go to this link: https://www.nyc.gov/portal/signin.jsp

PLEASE DO NOT REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE!

Thursday, January 18, 2007

Martinez Immigration View Riles GOP

HispanicBusiness.com

Martinez Immigration View Riles GOP

January 17, 2007

Lesley Clark -- McClatchy Newspapers

A group of border state Republicans, including the GOP party chair in President Bush's home state of Texas, plan to cast what they acknowledge may be only symbolic votes against Florida Sen. Mel Martinez as the new chief cheerleader for the national Republican Party.

Martinez, who ardently champions giving some illegal immigrants a shot at citizenship even as others in his party push for stricter controls at the border, is poised to be elected Friday as general chairman of the Republican National Committee. His selection signals the GOP's interest in boosting its appeal among Hispanics, the fastest growing electorate in the United States.

But some conservatives and anti-immigration forces have lambasted President Bush for selecting the Cuba-born Martinez as chairman of the Republican National Committee, singling out his support for what they call "amnesty" for illegal immigrants.

RNC members from border states, including Texas and Arizona, plan to vote against Martinez when the RNC gathers for its winter meeting in Washington starting Thursday - a meeting that comes only two months after what Bush called a "thumping" at the polls. "We've been bombarded with e-mails, letters and postcards from Texans troubled about Senator Martinez," said Tina Benkiser, chair of the Republican Party of Texas and a definite Martinez "no" vote.

Martinez's supporters - and even some critics - say the opposition is unlikely to derail his election.

Though the criticism of Martinez reflects the myriad challenges he'll face, Republicans, who lost both chambers of Congress in November, are desperate to reclaim majority status. Martinez's selection, strategists say, is seen as a way of positioning the party for the future, even though it risks alienating part of the party's base.

"It's not a question of a smart move, it's a question of survival, a recognition of the political realities of campaigning in the 21st century," said Fernand Amandi, executive vice president at Miami-based Bendixen and Associates, which specializes in Hispanic polling, mostly for Democrats. "It shows that Republicans can admit they made a mistake and that they know how to count. For Republicans to be able to be competitive nationally and in battleground states, you can't afford to lose the Hispanic community."

Bush, who ran ads in Spanish, took 40 percent of the Hispanic vote when he was re-elected in 2004, a record for Republicans. But various factors, including a divisive debate over immigration, eroded those gains in 2006, political analysts say. Within 25 years, some models suggest, Hispanic voters could make up as much as 25 percent of the electorate.

Martinez's first hurdle may be the warring factions within his own party. Colorado Republican Rep. Tom Tancredo, a potential 2008 presidential contender and a House leader in efforts to stop illegal immigration, suggested that if Martinez continued to push for a comprehensive immigration plan, "the party could be headed for another shellacking at the polls in 2008."

The stakes couldn't be much higher for Martinez: The race for the White House is wide open and Republicans have to defend 21 seats in the Senate. Democrats, in contrast, have only 12 members up for re-election.

Martinez himself will be up for re-election in 2010 and will essentially lose two years of fundraising as he boosts the RNC coffers. Analysts suggest he'll have to carefully navigate his appearances as RNC chief, so as not to jeopardize moderates in Florida whom he'll have to attract to win re-election. Martinez declined to be interviewed for this story, with his office saying it would be "presumptuous" to do so until he's officially elected chair.

Source: Copyright (c) 2007 The Herald. Distributed by McClatchy-Tribune Business News.

Friday, January 12, 2007

Community Conversations on the Budget

Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 12:09:47 -0500 (EST)
From: "NYC Council Legislative Update"
To: reysmont@yahoo.com
Subject: City Council Calendar for Jan. 15th, 2007 - Jan. 21st, 2007

City Council Calendar for Jan. 15th, 2007 - Jan. 21st, 2007


Community Conversations on the Budget
More info at http://www.nyccouncil.info/
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
In addition to legislative hearings held at City Hall, the Council is holding
meetings in every borough for individuals to identify their community's needs
and priorities. Also note that Budget ideas may be emailed directly to Speaker
Quinn at: http://www.nyccouncil.info/rightnow/contactspkr.cfm?issue=budget

Manhattan: Tuesday, January 16th
7:00pm
NYU Medical Center, 550 First Avenue, Classroom A
Bronx: Friday, January 19th
10:15am
Davidson Community Center, 2038 Davidson Avenue
Legislative Calendar
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Monday, January 15, 2007
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
No Scheduled Meetings
Tuesday, January 16, 2007
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Committee(s) on: Health
Time: 10:00 AM
Location: Council Chambers - City Hall
Oversight - New York City's Efforts to Encourage Enrollment in Child Health
Insurance Programs
Committee(s) on: Waterfronts
Time: 1:00 PM
Location: Committee Room - City Hall
Oversight - Managing the Erosion of City Beach Properties
Wednesday January 17, 2007
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
No scheduled meetings
Thursday, January 18, 2007
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
No scheduled meetings
Friday, January 19, 2007
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Committee(s) on: Veterans
Time: 1:00 PM
Location: New York State Veteran's Home at St. Albans
Chairperson(s): Hiram Monserrate
Tour: New York State Veteran's Home
at St. Albans
17850 Linden Blvd. Queens, New York


This is the NYC.gov news you requested for: Council Legislative Calendar Email
Updates


Note: The City Council Calendar list serve is now being powered by NYC.gov
To subscribe, please go to this link: https://www.nyc.gov/portal/signin.jsp


PLEASE DO NOT REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE!

NYS Legislation for State Tax Credit of Residential and Commercial Buildings

From: SBaileymcc@aol.com
Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 06:58:44 EST
Subject: NYS Legislation for State Tax Credit of Residential and Commercial Buildings
To:
reysmont@yahoo.com,

Good morning everyone,Attached is the legislation. This is great news and perhaps a formal distribution and letter should be sent out by community boards. I don't know the right answer but this will help communities talk with property owners about building improvements, maintenance and preservation.

Savona

File name:
060915NYSCommercial_ResidentialHistoricPreservationMemo.doc
File type: application/octet-stream



Information on the NYS

Commercial and Residential Historic Preservation Tax Credit Programs

Chapter 547 of the Laws of 2006

As a result of the advocacy of the Preservation League, Colleague organizations, and municipalities across New York State, Governor George Pataki has signed New York State's first-ever tax incentives for rehabilitation of historic commercial and residential structures. The legislation was sponsored by Assemblymember Ron Canestrari and Senators Vincent Leibell, Frank Padavan, and Catherine Young, and received a near-unanimous vote of support in the New York State Assembly and Senate.

Upon the Governor's signature, the State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) in the Office of Parks, Recreation and Historic Preservation (OPRHP) assumes responsibility for program implementation, which will take effect January 1, 2007. Until more specific program information and materials are available from OPRHP, refer to the legislative language (A.11987 / S. 8392) for basic details about the program.

The NYS tax incentive for historic commercial (income producing) properties will complement the existing Federal Historic Preservation Tax Incentive program (aka, the Investment Tax Credit or ITC). National Register-listed (or NR-eligible properties with a commitment to list) commercial properties that have been approved to receive the 20% federal rehabilitation credit now qualify for the additional New York State credit, covering 30% of the federal credit value, up to $100,000 per project. Further details and program materials will be forthcoming from SHPO.

The historic residential properties program authorized by this legislation is for State and National Register-listed, owner-occupied residential structures, limited to such structures located in distressed census tracts, defined as a "targeted areas" under section 143(j) of the Internal Revenue Code (IRC). The New York State Income Tax credit will cover 20% of qualified rehabilitation costs of residential structures, up to a credit value of $25,000. Use of the residential program will also require a municipal resolution identifying the area(s) where the tax credit is authorized for use, as well as adoption of a historic preservation and community renewal plan. The specifics of these requirements will be determined by OPRHP during program development.

A list of census tracts qualified for the distressed "targeted areas" of the residential program is available from the State of New York Mortgage Agency. This list is sorted by county and municipality. These census tracts can be located at a website maintained by the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD), and assessed at street level. No overlay of State or National Register districts or listings is available at this site.

Further information about State and/or National Register of Historic Places programs and listings in New York State, contact the appropriate State/National Register staff at the State Historic Preservation Office.

To receive information about program developments related to either the commercial or residential programs, please contact Daniel Mackay, Director of Public Policy at the Preservation League of New York State.

(See back of page for web links for the hypertext above.)

Hypertext Links:


1: State Historic Preservation Office: http://www.nysparks.com/shpo/ (518-237-8643)

2: Tax credit bill language: http://assembly.state.ny.us/leg/?bn=A11987&sh=t

3: Federal Historic Preservation Tax Incentive Program: http://www.cr.nps.gov/hps/TPS/tax/incentives/index.htm

4: Section 143 (j), Internal Revenue Code:
http://www.fourmilab.ch/ustax/www/t26-A-1-B-IV-A-143.html

5: NYS Census Tracts qualified as distressed:
http://www.nyhomes.org/docs/1544718820052003ctlistmuncipality2.pdf

6: HUDS website for census tract mapping:
http://qct.huduser.org/QCTGIS/USMainLand/Map.aspx

7: State and National Register of Historic Places:
http://www.nysparks.com/shpo/register/index.htm

8: State and National Register and Technical Assistance Staff at SHPO:

http://www.nysparks.com/shpo/state/map.htm (518-237-8643)

9: Email for Daniel Mackay, Preservation League of NYS: dmackay@preservenys.org

Harvard Outlines Plans to Expand Campus Across the Charles River

The New York Times

Harvard Outlines Plans to Expand Campus Across the Charles River
By KATIE ZEZIMA
Published: January 12, 2007

BOSTON, Jan. 11 — Harvard University released details on Thursday of a multibillion-dollar plan to expand from Cambridge across the Charles River to the Allston neighborhood of Boston. The university wants to transform more than 200 acres into a second, more modern, Harvard Square, with retail space, academic buildings, athletic and cultural facilities and student housing.

Skip to next paragraph
Multimedia

Map
Aerial photograph courtesy of MassGIS
Harvard’s proposed expansion project
would take 50 years to finish.

Harvard's Proposed Expansion

Harvard officials said they expected the project to take 50 years and to create 14,000 to 15,000 permanent jobs in an industrial part of the neighborhood that abuts a quiet residential one. They hope to break ground on a science building and arts center by the end of the year.

The proposal still must go through a public review and requires city approval.
“This plan is intended to give the city of Boston and the community a preliminary sense of the kind of development that will take place in Allston,” said Harvard’s interim president, Derek Bok.

The plan calls for placing Soldiers Field Road, a main artery that runs along the Charles River, underground, so pedestrians and students living in new dormitories on its banks can have easier access to the Cambridge campus.

The Harvard Business School and the university’s football stadium are already in Allston. The plans would create 30 acres of open space on land now covered with asphalt and transform some streets into wide pedestrian boulevards where people could stroll under canopies of trees.

The Allston campus would also be the base for the university’s athletic and science research facilities.

Harvard is looking to anchor the Allston campus around Barry’s Corner, an intersection that now has a gas station and a Dunkin’ Donuts. The plan calls for the area to be home to numerous retail shops, a performance center and a public plaza. Officials envision it as being the link between the residential neighborhood, which lies on one side, and the campus on the other.

Mayor Thomas M. Menino praised the plan, saying, “The community will benefit with the job creation efforts and new amenities.”

Not everyone in the neighborhood is so sure. Residents said many questions remained unanswered.

“Folks in the community are trying to figure out how Harvard’s growth can coexist with a vital urban neighborhood, and I think there’s still a lot of unanswered questions on that,” said Bob Van Meter, president of the Allston Brighton Community Development Corporation, which has been closely watching the developments. “This is one document today in a whole series of documents that have been developed and filed over the last several years.”

A neighborhood resident, Harry Mattison, said he feared the changes could cut Barry’s Corner off from the campus and the river, rather than unify it.

“Is this something that’s good for everyone?” asked Mr. Mattison, who runs a community blog. “Will the Harvard money and expertise bring everyone up, or does it draw a line? Could it be that they’ll be divided by not that much distance, but in some ways be miles apart?”

Thursday, January 11, 2007

Borough President Stringer Announces Creation of New Youth Sports League Serving 1,000 Children Across Manhattan





Borough President Stringer Announces Creation of New Youth Sports League Serving 1,000 Children Across Manhattan
~
New Initiative Seeks to Alleviate Shortage of After School Activities and Athletic Programs for Manhattan Youth

New York, NY (January 11, 2007) – Manhattan Borough President Scott Stringer in conjunction with the New York Police Athletic League (PAL) today announced the creation of the Borough President’s Youth Sports League (YSL), a new borough-wide initiative that will serve more than 1,000 children in neighborhoods across Manhattan.

Borough President Stringer was joined by Manhattan District Attorney Robert Morgenthau, Chairman of the PAL Board of Directors, to make the official announcement at halftime of the New York Knicks game on the parquet of Madison Square Garden on Wednesday night. Joining Stringer and Morgenthau at the game were more than 200 children participating in the new league.

Borough President Stringer said he created the Youth Sports League to alleviate a critical shortage of safe after school activities for Manhattan’s youth. Studies show that after-school programs are crucial for improving children’s experiences in school, reducing obesity among children, and decreasing incidence of crimes. In New York City, the prime time for juvenile crime is between 3-6 p.m. on school days.

“Throughout Manhattan there is a real shortage of after school and athletic programs for our children,” Borough President Stringer said. “I am committed to ensuring that parents and children have meaningful activities available during the crucial after school hours when too many of our young people find their ways into trouble.”

The Manhattan Borough President’s Youth Sports League will operate during the entire school year with basketball during the winter season, softball during the spring and flag football in the fall. The league will serve middle school and high school girls and boys.

Stringer’s Youth Sports League will operate with the assistance of the City’s Police Athletic League, a thriving city-wide program established in 1914 to keep young people out of trouble by channeling their energies into recreational and athletic programs.

Stringer’s league will begin in late January with teams from different locations throughout Manhattan, including East Harlem, Central Harlem, Washington Heights, Upper East Side, Midtown, and the West Village. Borough President Stringer said his office will continue actively looking to expand the program into other neighborhoods in the borough.
# # #

http://www.mbpo.org/press/pressreleases/news_item.2007-01-24.1022822810

Elder-Care Costs Deplete Savings of a Generation

The New York Times

Elder-Care Costs Deplete Savings of a Generation


Nicole Bengiveno/The New York Time
Elizabeth Rodriguez used her 401(k) to help care for her father, Samuel. “You don’t stop and calculate,” she said. “You just buy what you have to buy.”

By JANE GROSS
Published: December 30, 2006

To care for her ailing 97-year-old father over the past three years, Elizabeth Rodriguez, a vice president at the Federal Reserve Bank in New York, has borrowed against her 401(k) retirement plan, sold her house on Staten Island and depleted nearly 20 years of savings.

Skip to next paragraph

The money has gone to lawyers’ fees ($50,000) to win a contested guardianship. It has gone for home-care equipment like the mattress for his hospital bed (about $3,000 in all) and for a food service to deliver meals ($400 a month).

It has gone for a two-bedroom rental apartment big enough for herself, her dad and a home aide ($1,600 a month more than a one-bedroom apartment in the same building), and for a wheelchair-accessible van to get him to doctors’ appointments ($330 a trip).

Asked to tally the costs, Ms. Rodriguez, 58, said she had no idea how much she was spending. “A shower chair, body cream with no alcohol, new shoes,” she said. “You don’t stop and calculate.

You just buy what you have to buy.”

Ms. Rodriguez is among the legion of adult children — more than 15 million, according to various calculations — who take care of their aging parents, a responsibility that often includes paying for all or part of their housing, medical supplies and incidental expenses. Many costs are out of pocket and largely unnoticed: clothing, home repair, a cellular telephone.

Adult children with the largest out-of-pocket expenses are those supervising care long distance, those who hire in-home help and those whose parents have too much money to qualify for government-subsidized Medicaid but not enough to pay for what could be a decade of frailty and dependence.

The burden is compounded by ignorance, according to a study by AARP, released in mid-December, which found that most Americans have no idea how much long-term care costs and believe that Medicare pays for it, when it does not.

Families have always looked after their elderly loved ones. But never has old age lasted so long or been so costly, compromising the retirement of baby boomers who were expecting inheritances rather than the shock of depleted savings.

“There is a myth out there that families abandon their frail elders,” said Dr. Robert L. Kane, a geriatrician at the University of Minnesota School of Public Health. “Instead, across the income spectrum, children are sacrificing to care for their parents to the limit of their means and sometimes beyond.”

Researchers have documented the time spent by adult children, and others, caring for ailing relatives. But data is woefully inadequate on how much they actually spend, health economists say, because most people do not keep itemized entries as they write checks, use their credit cards or pocket money to meet the demands of the day.

“When you’re in the middle of the forest, with so many things coming at you, you can’t really see the trees,” Ms. Rodriguez said. “But each one of those trees has actual dollars connected to it.”
Costs are astronomical for long-term, low-tech care, the sort most often needed by those who linger with Alzheimer’s disease or are too frail to get around on their own. Medicare is of almost no help, since it covers only acute episodes like a heart attack, cancer or repair of a broken hip.

That means the elderly and their families are left to pay for assisted living (which averages $35,000 a year), nursing homes ($74,000) or home health aides. Only the very poor receive Medicaid, which pays nursing-home bills nationwide but home care in only a few states (New York among them), and nothing toward assisted-living rent.

Nor does Medicare cover equipment like grab bars for the shower and incontinence supplies, which alone can run $2,000 a year, or travel expenses for an adult child responding to medical emergencies.

Marilyn de Leo, for instance, has made two trips from New York City to Los Angeles since September, when her mother fell in the bathroom and broke her neck and both ankles. Ms. de Leo, 62, an associate director in the development office of Mount Sinai Medical Center, spent $800 on airfare for the first frantic trip , plus $50 a day on taxis, since she had left her eyeglasses behind in a mad dash to the airport and therefore could not rent a car. Ms. de Leo has no savings left, and is $5,000 in debt. When asked about her own future, she said, “I’ll have to work till I drop.”

Only one authoritative survey, in 2004, has even asked adult children how much they contribute to their parents’ support. Half said they did, and the average monthly expenditure was $200. Respondents who looked after their parents at least 40 hours a week said they spent an average of $324 a month.

But those figures were based on “quick, top-of-the-head estimates,” said Gail Hunt, president of the National Alliance for Caregiving, which conducted the survey.

Knowing the extent of these expenses might inform public policy, some experts say, calling attention to a gap in the government safety net for the elderly.

“Should this burden fall solely on the individual and the family?” asked Judy Feder, dean of the Public Policy Institute at Georgetown University. “And can we really expect this arrangement to keep doing the job as a larger and larger population comes to grips with it?”
1
2
Correction: January 4, 2007
A front-page article on Saturday about adult children who take care of their aging parents referred incorrectly to expenses for the care of a spouse that are tax deductible if they exceed 7.5 percent of adjusted gross income. They are medical expenses, not any expenses.

More Articles in National »

Bring hope to fellow New Yorkers. Donate to the Neediest Cases Fund.

Tips
To find reference information about the words used in this article, hold down the ALT key and click on any word, phrase or name. A new window will open with a dictionary definition or encyclopedia entry.

Related Articles
Here Come the Great-Grandparents (November 2, 2006)
NYC; When Care Becomes All We Can Give (September 15, 2006)
THE AGE OF DISSONANCE; Stop Spending My Inheritance (July 30, 2006)
WHERE WE LIVE; They Can Go Home Again (April 2, 2006)

Related Searches
Families and Family Life
Aged
Nursing Homes
More Articles in National »



Subject: Father died peacefully at home on Saturday Jan 13 at 3:52 PM.
From:
ElizabethAnn.Rodriguez
Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2007 05:55:57 -0500
To: "Jordi Reyes-Montblanc"
reysmont@yahoo.com

My father died peacefully at home on Saturday Jan 13 at 3:52 PM. Service and
viewing will be held at St. Mary's church, 440 Grand St in Manhattan (lower east
side).

Viewing starts at the church at 10:30 am followed by mass at 11:00 am.
The body will be taken for cremation following the service.

To reach St Mary's Church by train take "F" to Delancey St or "J" or "M" to
Essex st. Walk south 2 blocks to Grand St. then 3 blocks to 440 Grand - St.
Mary's Church.


Please do not send flowers. Any expression of condolence should be offered (in
dad's name) to an elder citizen directly or to an organization that represents
the needs of the poor and elderly.

Monday, January 08, 2007

Taking Control of Electric Bill, Hour by Hour

Taking Control of Electric Bill, Hour by Hour


Hiroko Masuike for The New York Times
The building on Central Park West where Peter Funk Jr. lives uses “smart” electrical meters. *

By DAVID CAY JOHNSTON
Published: January 8, 2007



Ten times last year, Judi Kinch, a geologist, got e-mail messages telling her that the next afternoon any electricity used at her Chicago apartment would be particularly expensive because hot, steamy weather was increasing demand for power.

Skip to next paragraph

Power Play
Putting Consumers in
Charge
Articles in this series are
examining the decade-long
effort to overhaul the nation’s
electricity system.

Previous Articles in the Series »

The New York Times

Each time, she and her husband would turn down the air-conditioners — sometimes shutting one of them off — and let the dinner dishes sit in the washer until prices fell back late at night.
Most people are not aware that electricity prices fluctuate widely throughout the day, let alone exactly how much they pay at the moment they flip a switch. But Ms. Kinch and her husband are among the 1,100 Chicago residents who belong to the Community Energy Cooperative, a pilot project to encourage energy conservation, and this puts them among the rare few who are able to save money by shifting their use of power.

Just as cellphone customers delay personal calls until they become free at night and on weekends, and just as millions of people fly at less popular times because air fares are lower, people who know the price of electricity at any given moment can cut back when prices are high and use more when prices are low. Participants in the Community Energy Cooperative program, for example, can check a Web site that tells them, hour by hour, how much their electricity costs; they get e-mail alerts when the price is set to rise above 20 cents a kilowatt-hour.

If just a fraction of all Americans had this information and could adjust their power use accordingly, the savings would be huge. Consumers would save nearly $23 billion a year if they shifted just 7 percent of their usage during peak periods to less costly times, research at Carnegie Mellon University indicates. That is the equivalent of the entire nation getting a free month of power every year.

Meters that can read prices every hour or less are widely used in factories, but are found in only a tiny number of homes, where most meters are read monthly.

The handful of people who do use hourly meters not only cut their own bills, but also help everyone else by reducing the need for expensive generating stations that run just a few days, or hours, each year. Over the long run, such savings could mean less pollution, because the dirtiest plants could be used less or not at all.

The vast majority of utility customers know only the average price of the electricity they used in any given month. But wholesale prices for electricity are set a day in advance, usually on an hour-by-hour or quarter-hour basis. Power companies and utilities are keenly aware of the pricing roller coaster, but they typically blend the numbers into a single monthly bill for their customers.

For most Chicagoans, the average summer price last year was 8.25 cents a kilowatt-hour. Although Ms. Kinch and her husband at times paid as much as 36.5 cents a kilowatt-hour — the peak price on the humid afternoon of Aug. 2 — they paid less than their neighbors over all. On 38 days, some of their power cost less than a penny a kilowatt-hour.

Other consumers who know the hourly price of their electricity have actually been able to get paid by utilities for power they did not use. In New York City last July, for instance, when there was a blackout in Queens, residents of one building on Central Park West voluntarily cut their demand as much as 42 percent and sold the capacity back into the electricity market so that it could be used where it was more needed.

Certainly, such situations are a big exception. The fact that most people have no idea how much their power costs has emerged as a sticking point in the ongoing effort to restructure the nation’s electricity business, which the federal government is moving from a system in which legal monopolies charge rates set by state regulators, toward a competitive system where the market sets the price.

But how does efficient pricing emerge in a business where access to information is so lopsided? A market, as defined by the courts, is a place where willing buyers and sellers who both have reasonable knowledge agree on a price; in the electricity markets, the advantage lies distinctly with those who make and distribute power.

Under either the traditional system of utility regulation, with prices set by government, or in the competitive business now in half the states, companies that generate and distribute power have little or no incentive to supply customers with hourly meters, which can cut into their profits.

Meters that encourage people to reduce demand at peak hours will translate to less need for power plants — particularly ones that are only called into service during streaks of hot or cold weather.

In states where rates are still regulated, utilities earn a virtually guaranteed profit on their generating stations. Even if a power plant runs only one hour a year, the utility earns a healthy return on its cost.

Skip to next paragraph

Power PlayPutting Consumers in Charge
Articles in this series are

examining the decade-long
effort to overhaul the nation’s
electricity system.
Previous Articles in the Series »

In a competitive market, it is the spikes in demand that cause prices to soar for brief periods. Flattening out the peaks would be disastrous for some power plant owners, which could go bankrupt if the profit they get from peak prices were to ebb significantly.

But as awareness of “smart meters” grows, so does demand for them, not only from consumers and environmental groups but also from government bodies responding to public anger over rising power prices. In Illinois, for example, the legislature passed a law in December requiring the program Ms. Kinch joined four years ago to be expanded from 1,100 customers to 110,000.

The law also required that Commonwealth Edison, the Chicago utility, hire a third party to run the program. It chose Comverge Inc., the largest provider of peak-load energy management systems in North America.

The smart metering programs are not new, but their continued rarity speaks in part to the success of power-generating companies in protecting their profit models. Some utilities did install meters in a small number of homes as early as three decades ago, pushed by the environmental movement and a spike in energy prices.

Today, the same set of circumstances seems to be prompting a revival of interest, and even the utility companies seem resigned to the eventuality of such programs. Anne R. Pramaggiore, the senior vice president for regulatory affairs at Commonwealth Edison of Chicago, said that in the past, interest in hourly meter was transitory.

“We really haven’t dealt with these issues for 30 years,” she said.

But a sustained effort to install more meters is likely now because of what Ms. Pramaggiore called a “fundamental change” in the energy markets. Rising fuel costs and environmental concerns are — once again — front and center.

When consumers know the price of their electricity in advance and can tailor their use, even minor changes in behavior can lead to lower home utility bills and less reliance on marginal power plants, said Kathleen Spees, a graduate student in engineering and public policy at Carnegie Mellon.

“Small reductions in demand can produce very large savings,” said Ms. Spees, who analyzed prices charged within the PJM Interconnection grid, which coordinates the movement of wholesale electricity for 51 million people from New Jersey to Illinois.

Consumers who cut back on power use at peak times can do more than just avoid high prices. They can make money, as people in the building on Central Park West learned last summer.

Peter Funk Jr., * an energy partner at the law firm Duane Morris who lives in the 48-unit co-op, persuaded his neighbors three years ago to install a single meter to the Consolidated Edison system and then to operate their own internal metering system. That made the building big enough to qualify for hour-by-hour pricing.

When the next day’s prices are scheduled to soar, the building superintendent and a few residents get e-mail messages or phone calls. “We have an orderly plan all worked out to notify people” so they can reduce their power use during the designated times, Mr. Funk said.

The residents save more than just the money on power not used during peak periods, when pricing has been as high as almost 50 cents a kilowatt-hour. During the blackout in July, when parts of Queens were without electricity for up to nine days, the building cut demand as much as 42 percent and sold the unused capacity for about $3,000.

That money helps the building offer a valuable benefit: On most weekend mornings, electricity for residents is free.


* Peter J. Funk Jr, is one of the founders and member of the Board of Directors of the Cooperative Coalition To Prevent Blackouts. The CCPB member buildings have been the leading edge of advance metering, Real-Time Pricing and demand management in New York City and the State.

Other founding members of the CCPB include Gregory Carlson, Executive Director of the Federation of New York Housing Cooperatives and Condominiums, Donald West, Vice Chairman of the Coordianting Council of Cooperatives, Margie Russell Executive Director of the New York Association of Real Estate Managers, Jordi Reyes-Montblanc, President of the HDFC Council and member of the Board of Directors of the Council of New York Cooperatives and Condominiums, and the late James Garst, President of the Mitchell-Lama Council.

The technical consultant and Secretariat of the CCPB is the well known and award- winning energy consultant Lewis M. Kwit, Presient of EIS, Inc.

Sunday, January 07, 2007

Universities power city's economy

New York Daily News
Be Our Guest
January 7, 2007

Universities power city's economy
By LEE BOLLINGER

It was recently reported that some 280,000 workers in New York's thriving financial sector collect more income than the other 1.5 million people working in Manhattan put together. Another recent report found that while a growing number of CEOs are relocating their offices back to Manhattan, many support jobs that used to come with corporate headquarters remain elsewhere.

We want New York to be a desirable location for global business leadership. But with so many manufacturing and back office jobs having largely left the city for lower-cost regions in recent decades, where are the new opportunities for those in the middle - and those seeking an upward path there?

One local economic sector continues to create a range of such jobs: higher education. The city has some 116 degree granting colleges and universities, including a resurgent .CUNY system and two of the most respected research universities in the world, NYU and Columbia. Collectively our local independent colleges and universities generate some $9.1 billion in direct spending and $21.2 billion in economic activity. As a result, our colleges and universities are critical not just to the city's intellectual life, but to its long-term economic vitality.

With approximately 14,000 employees, Columbia is the seventh largest nongovernment employer in the city. These jobs aren't moving out of the city or abroad because our mission of teaching and academic research is inherently rooted in a shared sense of place that allows ideas to thrive. That's why Columbia has proposed long-term growth of our existing academic community in the old Manhattanville manufacturing zone in west Harlem.

The fact is, institutions of higher education employ more than just neuroscience Ph.D.s on the one hand and unskilled, entry-level workers on the other. Two-thirds of our employees work across every level of support and administration: as accountants and human resource professionals, administrative and clerical staff, lab technicians and trained electricians. Our employment base is broadly reflective of the kind of mixed-income economy that used to exist in the manufacturing lofts and offices that once hummed in many of Manhattan's older business districts.

At Columbia, more than two-thirds of our employees live in New York City. And nearly a third of our staff, not including faculty, live in Harlem, Washington Heights and other upper Manhattan neighborhoods. Minority-, women- and locally owned businesses earn more than a third of our major construction contracts.

Through the next quarter century, Columbia's planned growth into west Harlem would create about 6,000 new jobs in an area that has been losing private sector employment for decades. Such growth is important to us because academic researchers, especially in medicine and science, need modern laboratory space to pursue innovative research. If universities in New York cannot provide such facilities, we will increasingly find that the best researchers will go to places that can.

Mayor Bloomberg has challenged us all to consider the public investments needed to sustain our city's projected growth in the decades ahead. But universities can help address two of the city's important long-term economic challenges: the need to create more middle-income jobs, and the need to attract the most pioneering thinkers who provide the intellectual capital so essential for any thriving world city.

We are a city that has always run on big ideas and that has always provided an engine of economic opportunity for people at every rung of the income ladder. Having research universities of the first rank that are a steady source of both good jobs and great minds is clearly one part of what it will mean for New York to maintain that kind of leadership.

Bollinger is President of Columbia University.

Originally published on January 7, 2007

Theory for mass deaths roils Mexico


Theory for mass deaths roils Mexico
By MARK STEVENSON, Associated Press Writer Sun Jan 7, 12:54 PM ET

MEXICO CITY - Mexicans have long been taught to blame diseases brought by the Spaniards for wiping out most of their Indian ancestors. But recent research suggests things may not be that simple.

While the initial big die-offs are still blamed on the Conquistadors who started arriving in 1519, even more virulent epidemics in 1545 and 1576 may have been caused by a native blood-hemorrhaging fever spread by rats, Mexican researchers say.

The idea has sparked heated debate in Mexican academic circles.

One camp holds that the epidemics could have been spread by rats migrating during a drought cycle; others say newly arrived Spanish miners may have disturbed the habitat of virus-carrying rodents while searching for gold and silver.

The revisionists draw support from one of the only authoritative firsthand accounts of the epidemics, a text lost for hundreds of years until it was found, misfiled, in a Spanish archive.

Dr. Francisco Hernandez, a physician to the Spanish king who witnessed the epidemic of 1576 and conducted autopsies, describes a fever that caused heavy bleeding, similar to the hemorrhagic

Ebola virus. It raced through the Indian population, killing four out of five people infected, often within a day or two.

"Blood flowed from the ears and in many cases blood truly gushed from the nose," he wrote. "Of those with recurring disease, almost none was saved."

Harvard-trained epidemiologist Dr. Rodolfo Acuna-Soto, a microbiology professor at Mexico's National Autonomous University, had Hernandez' work translated from the original Latin in 2000. He followed up with research into outbreaks in Mexico's isolated central highlands, where indigenous rats may have spread the disease through urine and droppings.

Acuna-Soto's theory — which has been published in several scientific journals, including Emerging Infectious Diseases and the American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene — runs counter to the belief that most of Mexico's Indian population died of Spanish-imported diseases such as smallpox, to which their bodies had no immunity.

"This wasn't smallpox," Acuna-Soto says. "The pathology just does not fit."

He says some historians in Mexico are offended by his theory.

"Much of the reason why these epidemics were left unstudied was that it was politically and institutionally easier to blame the Spaniards for all of the horrible things that might have happened," he said. "It was the official version of history."

Certainly, imported diseases such as smallpox, measles and typhoid fever did cause huge numbers of deaths starting in 1521. But the epidemics of 1545 and 1576 struck survivors of the first die-offs and their children, who would presumably have developed some immunity.

While there is no reliable figure on Mexico's population in the 1500s — estimates range from 6 million to 25 million — it is clear that by 1600 only around 2 million remained.

The epidemic "was so big that it ruined and destroyed almost the entire land," wrote Fray Juan de Torquemada, a Franciscan historian who witnessed the epidemic of 1576, adding Mexico "was left almost empty."

"Many were dead and others almost dead, and nobody had the health or strength to help the diseased or bury the dead."

Other accounts speak of a rodent invasion, and Acuna-Soto teamed up with U.S. researchers to investigate whether an abnormally severe drought may have pushed rats into human settlements or vice versa.

But another Mexican expert in the field insists the rodents mentioned in texts from the era probably came from Europe or Asia carrying the bubonic plague, which sometimes caused its victims to vomit blood.

Elsa Malvido, a demographer, historian and an expert on ancient epidemics for the National Institute of Anthropology and History, says the plague could have caused the more severe hemorrhagic symptoms recorded by Hernandez, because it was attacking a population with no immunity whatsoever.

But Dr. Carlos Viesca, director of medical history at Mexico's national university, says he is close to being convinced the epidemics were native.

"The problem didn't start in Acapulco or Veracruz," the two main seaports where rats would have landed from overseas, he said. Instead, the disease appears to have started in the central highlands at a time when the Spaniards sent mining expeditions to unsettled parts of Mexico, raising the possibility that humans invaded rodent habitats, he said.

Relatively few Spaniards were affected by the outbreak, possibly because in either eventuality they were protected: If the cause was bubonic plague or smallpox, their bodies had greater immunity to it; and if it was rodent-borne, they were less likely to come into contact with the animals.


Click here: Theory for mass deaths roils Mexico - Yahoo! News
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070107/ap_on_sc/mexico_ancient_plague

Tuesday, January 02, 2007

Medicines patent loophole 'found'

Date: Tue, 2 Jan 2007 18:50:18 -0800 (PST)
From: "Anne Z. Whitman"
Subject: Fwd: Is Columbia making money by selling out to drug companies?
To: "Jordi Reyes Montblanc"

I see it as ego driven commercialism at the expense of the ordinary citizen/on the gov't tab

Date: Tue, 02 Jan 2007 12:10:13 -0500
From: "hudson moving and storage"
Subject: Is Columbia making money by selling out to drug companies?
To: "Anne Z. Whitman" whitmananne

[The following report that just came in from the BBC indicates not only a way to get around drug patents to make medicines available at a affordable costs, but also urges university researchers NOT to sell their findings to drug companies. I wonder what Columbia's record is on this? Some medical researchers manifestly see their work as the equivalent of trying to win the big lottery. Columbia has boasted that much of its income now comes from medical research -- several hundred million dollars annually. And the bio tech complex its hopes to locate in lower West Harlem presumably is income oriented. Sending this by blind copy to the principal Columbia administrators. Needless to say the profit-making by American medicine is a national disgrace. Perhaps one of them will respond rather than their west coast lawyer? Ed Kent]

http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/em/-/1/hi/health/6224601.stm
Last Updated: Tuesday, 2 January 2007, 12:35 GMT

Medicines patent loophole 'found'


Hepatitis C is carried in blood cells

Researchers who have found a way to bypass the legal patent on an expensive drug say others should follow suit.

Imperial College experts have developed a potentially cheaper version of an existing Hepatitis C drug by altering the molecular structure.

They have also called on other universities and charities to retain the rights to new discoveries, rather than sell them to big drugs companies.The industry warned any such 'new' drug may need dedicated safety trials.

The work of Professor Sunil Shaunak, an expert on infectious diseases, and his colleague, Steve Brocchini, from the London School of Pharmacy, was funded by, among others, the Department of Trade and Industry and the Wellcome Trust.

Sugar solution

The most effective drug treatment for the Hepatitis C virus is a version of a naturally-occurring molecule called interferon, which has been modified by coating it with sugar to allow it to remain in the body for longer.

The patent for the resulting drug - pegylated interferon - ruled out any other pharmaceutical which involved interferon coated with sugar.

"We in academic medicine
can either choose to use our
ideas to make large sums of
money for small numbers of
people, or to look outwards
to the global community and
make affordable medicines"
Professor Sunil Shuanak
Imperial College London

However, the Imperial team found a way to place the necessary sugar elsewhere on the interferon molecule instead, effectively creating a new medicine not covered by the patent.

They plan to find a way to develop and market this alternative without involving pharmaceutical firms, at a fraction of the cost of the original medicine.

Professor Shaunak said: "As far as we're concerned, the end-game is the cure - you can get to the end-game in several different ways, and we have found a different way of doing it.""What we have to recognise is that we have a real opportunity to cure infectious diseases in the developing world."At the current price, only a fraction of the number of people who could benefit from the drug will actually receive it."

Success for sale

Currently, many of the scientific advances which eventually lead to effective treatments are developed within universities or by researchers working for charities, but that 'intellectual property' is then sold to pharmaceutical companies who bring the product to market.

Professor Shaunak called for a different approach - for academic institutions to go into competition for cures with 'big pharma'.

"We in academic medicine can either choose to use our ideas to make large sums of money for small numbers of people, or to look outwards to the global community and make affordable medicines."

A spokesman for the Association of the British Pharmaceutical Industry said that should this prove to be a 'new' medicine, then the same costly and time-consuming safety trials would need to be undergone before the drug could be marketed.

"Even if these are successful, you'd have to invest in commercial development to manufacture, distribute and promote the usage of your drug."

He said that pharmaceutical companies were already working hard to ensure medicines get to patients in the developing world, and often chose not to enforce patents.The pharmaceutical company Roche, which produced the original version of pegylated interferon, said that it sought patents in order to guarantee the resources to re-invest in further 'cutting edge advances'.

A spokesman added: "Roche is committed to ensuring that as many people as possible can gain access to our medicines, many of which have transformed once deadly diseases into manageable and even curable conditions."--

SEE ALSO
NHS urged to 'reduce drugs bill' 28 Dec 06 Health
New Aids drugs 'soaring in cost' 01 Dec 06 World
Expiring patents hit Pfizer sales 20 Jul 06 Business
WTO upholds cheaper drugs waiver 07 Dec 05 Business
Is the WTO drugs deal flawed? 07 Sep 03 Health

RELATED INTERNET LINKS
Imperial College London
Association of the British Pharmaceutical Industry
The BBC is not responsible for the content of external internet sites