Saturday, March 31, 2007

Sunday March 11, 2007 Installation of CB9M Officers at Havana Central

Sunday March 11, 2007

Community Board No. 9 Manhattan
Installation of Officers
at Havana Central in the West End


Jackie Rowe Adams Sings The Star Spangled Banner

Officers being sworn in by The Rt. Rev. Kowalski, Dean
of St. John The Divine Cathedral Church


The Rt. Rev. Kowalski, NYS Assembly Member Hon. Keith L.T. Wright,
Hon. Jackie Rowe Adams, District Leader and CB9M Chairman Reyes-Montblanc


L to R Yvonne Stennet Asst. Treasurer, Barbara Marshall, Treasurer,
Ramona Jannette, Asst. Secretary, Theodore Kovaleff, Secretary
Patricia Jones, 2nd Vice Chair, Carolyn Thompson, 1st Vice Chair
and Chairman Jordi Reyes-Montblanc


Chairman Reyes-Montblanc being Sworn in by The Rt. Rev. Kowalski

Jackie Rowe Adams sings America The Beautiful


Miss Ernestine Welch, Chair of Seniors Issues Committee
and Mr. Martin Smith, Director Constituency Services,
Office of Council Member Robert Jackson


Yvonne Stennet, Co-Chair Housing, Land Use & Zoning with Daughter

Chairman Reyes-Montblanc and Hon. Keith L.T. Wright


Board Member Diane Wilson and Maritta Dunn, Chair Piers,
Waterfront & economic Development



The Hon. Herman "Denny" Farrell, Jr. addresses the
audience and congratulates newly installed Officers
The Hon. Keith L.T. Wright acted as Master of Ceremonies


Board Member Cecil Corbin-Marks


Ramona Jeannette, Asst. Secretary and Co-Chair Youth, Education & Libraries
Committee and her husband Mr. Jeannette


Mr. Martin Smith and Carlotta Damanda, Parliamentarian

Ms. Eutha Prince, CB9M Senior Staff

The Wrecking Crew

Photographs Courtesy of CB9M Board Member Michael J. Palma, Phtographer To the Stars

Friday, March 30, 2007

Tensions Over French Identity Shape Voter Drives




Tensions Over French Identity Shape Voter Drives

Reuters
Nicolas Sarkozy, left, the conservative candidate in France’s presidential campaign, and Ségolène Royal, right, the Socialist candidate, have been debating what it means to be French in what is interpreted as an effort to woo right-wing voters and reassure the French of their role in the world.




By ELAINE SCIOLINO
Published: March 30, 2007

PARIS, March 29 — France’s presidential campaign has been seized by a subject long monopolized by the extreme right: how best to be French.

The conservative candidate, Nicolas Sarkozy, wants to create a ministry of “immigration and national identity” that would require newcomers to embrace the secular values of the republican state.

The Socialist candidate, Ségolène Royal, wants every French citizen to memorize “La Marseillaise” and keep a French flag in the cupboard for public display on Bastille Day.

The far-right candidate, Jean-Marie Le Pen, of the National Front party, chortles that his rivals have stolen — and therefore validated — his message of “France for the French.”

Some political commentators have accused Mr. Sarkozy of harking back to the darkest period in modern French history: the collaborationist Vichy government during the Nazi occupation. Ms. Royal, meanwhile, is being attacked by both her rivals and her own camp for manipulating symbols that historically have been the domain of the far right.
With the first round of the election 24 days away, the battle over French identity has overtaken discussion of more practical issues like reducing unemployment and making France more competitive.

On Tuesday, as if to underscore the tensions over identity, roving bands of young people threw objects at the police, smashed store windows and damaged property for several hours at the Gare du Nord, a major train station in Paris. The trouble started when an illegal immigrant from Congo jumped a turnstile in the subway and tried to punch a transit agent who asked to see his ticket.

The police shut down the subway and commuter train system, arrested 13 suspects and used tear gas before restoring order after midnight.

The shift to debating Frenchness is aimed in part at luring the right-wing vote away from Mr. Le Pen, who shocked France in 2002 when he finished the first round of voting in second place.

It is also an attempt to reassure jittery voters that France will remain an important power at a time when it is losing prominence in a larger European Union and a globalized world and struggling with a disaffected Muslim and ethnic Arab and African population at home.

“Resolving the identity crisis in France is a very serious problem, but both Nicolas Sarkozy and Ségolène Royal have trivialized it in this election,” said Eric Dupin, a political scientist and an author. “Both of them are playing on the fears and the base emotions of the people.”

François Bayrou, the centrist candidate who leads the tiny Union for French Democracy party, denounced the “nationalistic obsession” that had infiltrated the campaign. “Every time in our past that we have wanted to go back to external signs, it has led to periods that are unhappy,” he said.

For the past few years, France has struggled with economic and cultural issues related to its immigrants. One is shared by much of the rest of Europe: how to stop the influx of illegal immigrants who drain a country’s economy and social services. A second is how to force French citizens of immigrant origin to obey laws, including those banning practices like polygamy and the wearing of head scarves by Muslim girls and women in schools and universities.

As interior minister before he stepped down Monday to focus on his campaign, Mr. Sarkozy tightened immigration laws and boasted that he had expelled tens of thousands of illegal immigrants and prevented others from entering. His pledge in 2005 to rid France’s ethnic Arab and Muslim suburbs of “scum” contributed to a three-week orgy of violence there.

Mr. Sarkozy, who has largely avoided the suburbs during his campaign, has criticized immigrants and their offspring who resist the French model of integration, saying it is unacceptable to want to live in France without respecting and loving the country or learning French.

He touched off the current debate in a television appearance on March 8 when he announced a plan to create a “ministry of immigration and national identity” if elected.

Ms. Royal called the plan “disgraceful,” adding, “Foreign workers have never threatened French identity.”

“Indecent,” was the reaction of Azouz Begag, the minister for equal opportunity. “I’m not stupid, and neither are the French,” he said. “It’s a hook to go and look for the lost sheep of the National Front.”

Simone Veil, a beloved former government minister and Holocaust survivor, found herself denouncing Mr. Sarkozy’s idea shortly after she endorsed him for president.

“I didn’t at all like this very ambiguous formula,” she told the magazine Marianne. She said a ministry for immigration and “integration” would be a better idea.

Mr. Sarkozy was unfazed. “I want the promotion of a common culture,” he said in reply to his critics.

Indeed, an OpinionWay Internet poll for the newspaper Le Figaro, splashed on the paper’s front page this month, indicated that 55 percent of French voters approved. Sixty-five percent agreed that the “immigrants who join us must sign up to the national identity.”

Although the poll was conducted using a representative sample via the Internet, not by using more reliable telephone surveys, it was widely cited as evidence that the French wanted a more restrictive immigration policy and that they wanted Muslims here conform to secular French customs.

But Mr. Sarkozy’s proposal has revived memories of the Vichy era. The idea of a national identity ministry has been compared to the General Commissariat of Jewish Affairs, which was created with ministerial rank under the Vichy administration. “Only Vichy developed administrative structures in their efficient way to defend a certain concept of ‘national identity,’ ” the columnist Philippe Bernard wrote in Le Monde last week. He said that the Commissariat, “even before being a tool in the service of the policy of extermination, responded to the objective of purification of the French nation.”

Some conservative Jewish voters, who were planning to vote for Mr. Sarkozy because of his staunch support of Israel, say they now are considering shifting to Mr. Bayrou.

Despite Ms. Royal’s criticism of Mr. Sarkozy, she followed his lead by wrapping herself tightly in her own mantle of nationalism. She started by encouraging her supporters to sing “La Marseillaise,” the national anthem and the rallying cry of the right, at the end of her rallies.

Last week in southern France, which historically votes for the right and extreme right, she called for a “reconquest of the symbols of the nation” from the right.

She said all French citizens should have the French flag at home, adding, “In other countries, they put the flag in the windows on their national holiday.” And she promised that if elected, she would “ensure that the French know ‘La Marseillaise.’ ”

In the end, both camps acknowledge that they are trying to appeal to voters on the right.

“Ségolène Royal is taking back the terrain too often abandoned by the left for ages to the right and the extreme right,” said a former defense and interior minister, Jean-Pierre Chevènement, who supports her.

Mr. Sarkozy was more explicit. “Since 1983, we have the strongest far right in Europe,” he said this month. “We must not proceed as if it does not exist. I want to talk to those who have moved toward the far right because they are suffering.”

During a campaign trip last week in the Caribbean, where some of the region’s residents can vote in French elections, Mr. Sarkozy boasted that after he proposed his immigration and national identity ministry, his standing in the polls jumped.

More Articles in International »

Small Business Services Newsletter - April 1, 2007

Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2007 17:17:42 -0400 (EDT)
From: "My NYC.gov News"
To: reysmont@yahoo.com
Subject: Small Business Services Newsletter - April 1, 2007




April 1, 2007 http://www.nyc.gov/html/sbs

Serving New York's Businesses
City Helps Fashion Firms "Design" Business Plans
April 1, 2007 - When the major design houses show off their creations at New York Fashion Week in February and September each year, all eyes turn to the runway. But the fashion industry has an important presence in New York City year round. Full Story

Opening a Restaurant in NYC? Then We're Sending You to Boot Camp
April 1, 2007 - Thinking about opening a restaurant in New York City? "Restaurant Boot Camp," a free, half-day seminar on starting and managing a restaurant, is the right place to start. The course, which is offered at the Lower Manhattan Business Solutions Center, is taught by a business consultant with a specialty in the restaurant industry, and covers everything from obtaining permits to labor laws to the City's health code. Full Story

City Program Connects Your Biz to Show Biz
April 1, 2007 - Looking to tap into business from the City's $5 billion entertainment industry? The Mayor's Office of Film, Theatre and Broadcasting's "Made in NY" Discount Card program can introduce your business to the industry. Full Story More Information for Businesses NYC Business SolutionsMinority and Woman-Owned Business Enterprise ProgramMayor's Office of Industrial and Manufacturing Businesses



Serving New York's Jobseekers


City Trains Jobseekers for Demands of Today's Economy

April 1, 2007 - For twenty-five years Julius Diaz worked at John Chatillon & Sons, a mechanical scales manufacturer in Kew Gardens, Queens, as a quality control inspector. When the company closed its factory in 2005, Diaz, 55-years-old at the time, was left without a job. Working with a counselor at the Career Center, Diaz decided to use his unemployment benefits for a concentrated training program in computer technology. Diaz attended courses at ACE Computer Training Center in Forest Hills, and is now a COMPTIA Certified A+ and N+ technician. Full Story

Sectors Initiative Charts New Course for Job Training
April 1, 2007 - More than 300 New Yorkers are receiving training for jobs in growing industries thanks to a new partnership between SBS and the Workforce Development Funders Group, a group of foundations which pool their money to address workforce development issues. Full Story

SBS Creates "Organic" Relationship with Whole Foods Market
April 1, 2007 - Robert Libertella, a Staten Island native, is among the 350 New Yorkers who have received jobs at Whole Foods Market's new store, which opened at the corner of Houston and Bowery on March 29. Mr. Libertella, who will be a chef at the new store, said he has "never seen anything like this" in terms of the City placing such a large number of New Yorkers in jobs. Full Story

WIB's Web Expands With Three New Members
April 1, 2007 - Mark Elliott, Robert C. Lieber and Ramon M. Tallaj have recently joined the City's Workforce Investment Board (WIB), the body which oversees and establishes policies for an array of employment and training services for businesses and jobseekers funded by the Workforce Investment Act of 1998. Full Story

City Partners to Make New York More Hospitable to Tourism Industry
February 22, 2007 - Kingsborough Community College (KCC) today announced that it has been awarded a $l.6 million grant from the U.S. Department of Labor to provide free training for more than 500 city residents for employment in the hospitality industry. Full Story

More Information for Jobseekers

Workforce1 Career Centers

Workforce Investment Board




Serving New York's Neighborhoods

BID to Help Sunnyside's Commercial Corridor Shine

April 1, 2007 - Home to dozens of restaurants, the Museum of African Art, and the Thalia Spanish Theater, Sunnyside is a vibrant neighborhood in Queens known for its ethnic diversity. The community, located along the 7 train just minutes from the Queensboro Bridge and Queens Midtown tunnel, is home to growing international restaurants and an expanding arts community. In an effort to support this development and provide additional services to the central commercial corridor of the neighborhood, the Department of Small Business Services is partnering with local groups to develop a Business Improvement District (BID) in the neighborhood. Full Story

Make Your "Next Stop" Right Here!
April 1, 2007 - Thinking about what neighborhood should be your next stop for eating, shopping and sightseeing in New York City? From the views of the City skyline offered from Roosevelt Island to the artists of DUMBO to the "global village" of Jackson Heights, the Next Stop: NYC website offers the low-down on some of the City's most diverse, fascinating and fun neighborhoods along the "F" subway line - and specifics on where to eat, shop and sightsee in each. Full Story

We Want to Know: Who's Making a Difference in Your Neighborhood?
March 19, 2007 - The New York City Department of Small Business Services today called for the nomination of individuals, small businesses and community organizations for the 2007 Neighborhood Achievement Awards, to be hosted by Mayor Michael R. Bloomberg and Commissioner Robert W. Walsh at Gracie Mansion in July. Full Story


More Information on Neighborhoods
Business Improvement DistrictsNext Stop: NYC This is the NYC.gov News you requested for:Small

Business Update
To subscribe: https://www.nyc.gov/portal/register.jsp

To unsubscribe: https://home.nyc.gov/portal/signin.jsp
Comment on this news service.
PLEASE DO NOT REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE!

C'mon, Columbia, Take Eminent Domain Off the Table

From: "Mercedes Narciso"
To: "Jordi Reyes-Montblanc" , Subject:
FW: CRD Newsletter: "C'mon, Columbia, Take Eminent Domain Off the Table"
Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2007 16:35:33 -0400

Mercedes Narciso
PRATT CENTER FOR COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
Tel. (718) 636-3486 x6449


From: Center for Rethinking Development [mailto:crd@manhattan-institute.org]
Sent: Friday, March 30, 2007 3:30 PM
To: mnarciso@pratt.eduSubject: CRD Newsletter: "C'mon, Columbia, Take Eminent Domain Off the Table"

The Manhattan Institute’sCenter for Rethinking Development
Ideas that shape the city’s planning, housing, and development
Monthly Newsletter



C'mon, Columbia, Take Eminent Domain Off the Table
Julia Vitullo-Martin,
March 2007

Is there any serious doubt that Columbia University's strategy to expand northward into Manhattanville is basically good for New York? Columbia urgently needs space—and Manhattanville, formerly an industrial area, has plenty of space to accommodate Columbia's handsome Renzo Piano plan.

Land-locked as it is on its Morningside Heights campus, Columbia has long had almost no ability to build the new research facilities and laboratories that are essential to keeping it ranked among the world's great universities. Indeed, it now has less than 200 square feet per student—far less than its nearby competitors, Princeton, Penn, or Harvard.

As New York City's seventh largest private employer—and surely one of its most prestigious—Columbia's new campus would add another 6,900 premium jobs to the local economy. The 17 acres on which it hopes to build what it's calling an "academic center" between 125th and 133rd Streets and Broadway and Riverside Drive are largely underutilized relative to the rest of Manhattan—in part because the area is zoned industrial and has been waiting for decades for a new economic use.

Now the economic use is here, and those who care about the city's economy should be cheering.

The same advocates who routinely denounce employers (Wal-Mart, for example) for providing only poorly paid jobs without benefits should be out in force applauding Columbia's highly paid jobs with generous benefits and pensions. Yet local support for Columbia has been far from unanimous, and the advocates (including some Columbia graduates) are mainly on the other side. One of the world's finest research and teaching universities, Columbia may be more renowned abroad than loved here at home.

How can that be? Part of the problem is the somehow ever-fresh historical legacy of 1968, when Columbia's plan to build a gym in Morningside Park provoked fierce community opposition. And part is the class antagonism generated by an exclusive, elite university bordered by struggling neighborhoods.

EMINENT DOMAIN'S UGLY THREATBut part of the hostility is due to Columbia’s stubborn insistence on retaining eminent domain as an option to be exercised by the State of New York if Columbia cannot purchase privately all the land it believes it needs.

"We're not going to take it off the table," says Columbia's executive vice president Robert Kasdin. "We're going to preserve our right to argue to the state that it’s in the public interest that they do it."

Even the strongest Harlem supporters of the Manhattanville plan, like realtor Willie Kathryn Suggs, balk at eminent domain. "I don't want them invoking eminent domain for private use. It's not right," says Suggs. "The neighborhood will get safer streets and better restaurants. I want that to happen. But under the rules. If they want more property they should buy it fairly, like anyone else."

And the opponents are ferocious. Manhattanville's largest private property owner, Nick Sprayregen, President of Tuck-It-Away Self-Storage, says that Columbia wants four of his five buildings. (The fifth, which was landmarked last year, is being left alone.) "I won't move," says Sprayregen. "But Columbia wants it all—100% of everything. They have no desire for nuance, for compromise, for diversity."

Or as resident Luisa Henriquez says, "Columbia moving in is a bad thing because Columbia isn't willing to share." Henriquez lives on 132nd Street in a city-owned building (one of two in the expansion site) that is operating under the Department of Housing Preservation and Development's Tenant Interim Lease (TIL) apartment lease purchase program. TIL trains tenant associations to manage and maintain their building with the ultimate goal of permitting tenants to buy their apartments for $250—a remnant of the bad days of property abandonment in the 1970s and early 1980s. If Columbia pursues the city-owned buildings it will have to pay their market value purchase price as well as negotiate "an equitable resolution for the tenants that at least equals what they would receive through the TIL program," notes Neill Coleman, spokesperson for the housing agency. This will be a very expensive proposition.

ONE MAN'S BLIGHT...Columbia argues that Manhattanville is "blighted," a condition that automatically allows the state to exercise eminent domain. It insists that its goal is to ";transform what is now a largely isolated, underutilized streetscape of garage openings, empty ground floors, roll-down metal gates and chain-link fences on the blocks from West 125th to 133rd Streets into a cohesive, reanimated center for educational, commercial and community life."

Ester Fuchs, a Professor of International and Public Affairs and Political Science at Columbia, is right when she argues, "The health of the city historically has always been about neighborhood transformation. For neighborhoods to stay the same is a recipe for a stagnant city."

But healthy transformations in American cities have generally been more successfully accomplished by homeowners, restaurateurs, retailers, and small business owners acting individually rather than by huge institutions exercising the government’s power of eminent domain. Columbia desires a contiguous campus—but that may well produce a less interesting streetscape than what would derive from a mix of academic buildings and private businesses.

And there are many who argue that the neighborhood is already on its way back. They point to the artists' studios and lofts, the rehabilitated city-owned apartment buildings, the good restaurants, the successful manufacturing firms as proof that the neighborhood, far from blighted, is experiencing a natural renaissance. "I can co-exist with Columbia," says Sprayregen. "Why can't Columbia coexist with me? My father built this business, which I intend to hand onto my children. We worked hard for the neighborhood, and intend to be part of its success."

Sprayregen fully understands the irony of his situation. He operates a business in a neighborhood whose long, slow decline has been caused in part by the dead hand of industrial zoning—imposed by city government. Now that same municipally imposed decline may be pronounced "blight" by the state, triggering the loss of his property. "This is blight forced on the neighborhood by city regulations," he notes. "But despite its zoning, the neighborhood is far better off now than it’s ever been. Yet Columbia, ironically, is claiming it’s so terrible and so blighted."

WHAT’S NEXT
The crucial blight assessment that the state will use to determine if eminent domain can be invoked is being conducted by AKRF, an environmental consulting firm that is also drawing up the Draft Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS) for Columbia. This is unusual, and raises obvious questions about the independence of the blight assessment. The certification of the DEIS by the Department of City Planning will start the Uniform Land Use Review Procedure (ULURP) that will move Columbia’s proposal through a seven-month community review.

Neither Columbia nor City Planning is willing to estimate when the plan will enter ULURP beyond "spring." Once City Planning certifies that the application is complete and ready for public review, the plan will move to Community Board 9, which already has its own competing proposals for Manhattanville. CB 9 will have 60 days to hold hearings and adopt a recommendation to the City Planning Commission. The hearings are likely to be fierce, unruly, and informative. The plan will also be reviewed by the Manhattan Borough President, the City Planning Commission, and the City Council, which has the final say—unless the Mayor decides to veto a council action.

Thursday, March 29, 2007

Parks Dept. Pays $1,100 To Plant a Single Sapling

From: Daniel Bowman Simon
To: wrg@lists.interactivist.net
Subject: Yesterday's NY Sun: Parks Dept. Pays $1,100 To Plant a Single Sapling
Date: Mon, March 29, 2007 11:21 AM


FYI.


While it's no secret that it's mind-bogglingly expensive to plant a tree in NYC...yet another service that nature usually provides pro-bono...this article sheds some light on why it costs so much...and it even seems there's some hope to lower the price per tree. (It doesn't mention, however, costs associated with digging up sidewalk...so are these costs limited to replacing dead trees or vacated treepits.)

Of course, if the planted trees are better optimized for stormwater capture, the city will save more and more via reduced wastewater treatment costs in the long term.
And if you're hungry for more info on the value of a tree, look no further:
Backstory: What is the value of a tree?


http://www.csmonitor.com/2006/0426/p20s01-sten.html
Best,

Daniel Bowman Simon, LEED® Accredited Professional
Green Roof Coordinator/Low Impact Development Analyst
www.GaiaInstituteNY.org
www.GaiaSoil.com










Dept. Pays $1,100 To Plant a Single Sapling
BY JOSEPH GOLDSTEIN - Staff Reporter of the Sun
March 28, 2007
URL:
http://www.nysun.com/article/51315

It costs $18 to plant a sapling in Israel. So why, on average, does it cost the parks department $1,100 to plant one in New York City?

The trees planted in Israel are a fraction of the size of the saplings planted by the parks department. Still a former parks commissioner says the city is paying more money than it should for each tree.

The high cost can be attributed in large part to an increase in labor costs, which date to a 2003 decision by the city comptroller, William Thompson, to raise the pay of tree planters more than threefold. Today, tree planters make about $55 an hour, up from the $15 hourly wage they were paid before the change. Prior to that decision, the price of planting a tree was about $700.

That seems like a lot," the current commissioner for the parks department in Westchester County, Mitchell Tutoni, said when told of the $1,100 price tag in the city.

The increase in labor costs has resulted in a sharp drop in the number of trees the parks department can afford to plant, a former parks commissioner, Henry Stern, said.

"There are enormous adverse consequences from this to the greening of the city of New York," he said.

During the first three fiscal years of this decade, the parks department planted between 10,000 and 13,000 saplings each year along city streets, according to the parks department. By contrast, during fiscal year 2006, the department planted 7,200 saplings.

In addition to rising wage costs, one contractor, Angelo DeBartoli, said a second change in the contracts contributes to the high price of planting a tree in New York City. A new rule requires contractors to replant trees that are felled by vandalism within two years of their planting, he said in a telephone interview. Mr. DeBartoli, the owner of Robert Bello Landscaping, said it was "insane" that contractors had to guarantee the trees against vandalism once the plantings were finished.

Still, Mr. DeBartoli said the sudden rise in cost was largely caused by the required wage increase for tree planters.

The decision to raise the wages came as the comptroller's office reclassified the job of planting trees to labor from gardening.

But that classification is in question today, as it was when it was made.

"We got lumped into the laborer category, but we're landscapers," Mr. DeBartoli said. "We don't come out with cranes and all kinds of fancy equipment. We come out and dig a hole and plant a tree and put stones around it."

The trees, which are about 8 feet tall, often weigh 400 pounds. While heavy labor is a part of the job, it is only a small part of it, he said.

Mr. DeBartoli, whose landscaping firm plants some 2,000 saplings annually for the city, said he and 10 other contractors have formed an association and intend to ask Mr. Thompson to change the wages they must pay their work crews.

A spokesman for the comptroller did not return repeated calls for comment.

Wednesday, March 28, 2007

LDC Criticized at Public Forum - Attendees Accuse Development Corp. of Ignoring Their Concerns




Home > News
LDC Criticized at Public Forum
Attendees Accuse Development Corp. of Ignoring Their Concerns
By Anna Phillips
Issue date: 3/28/07 Section: News
















Media Credit: Erin Durking


Of the 20 people who approached the microphone at the community forum of the West Harlem Local Development Corporation last night, few were forgiving in their criticisms of the board.

Composed of members representing different constituencies within the community, the LDC is the organization with which Columbia is negotiating a Community Benefits Agreement to accompany its proposed Manhattanville expansion. As negotiations have begun within the last several months, disapproval of the group and its negotiating tactics has mounted among some in the community. Residents, business owners, and activists have accused the LDC of lacking transparency, and they have denounced the group's decision not to mandate that Columbia renounce eminent domain as a precondition to negotiations.

Minutes before the LDC held its second community forum, members of the Coalition to Preserve Community gathered outside to protest the group. Of those protesters who held signs and shook tambourines, several were actually members of the LDC.

CPC member Tom Kappner blamed the group's perceived missteps on "politicians who engineered what amounted to a coup by forcing their way onto the board." Eight Harlem elected officials have representatives on the LDC.

Inside the forum, many stepped up to the microphones and filled three hours with accusations and criticism against Columbia and the LDC.

"We need to fight for principles, not crumbs," said Norman Siegel, attorney for the West Harlem Business Group, saying that if eminent domain remained on the table, the CBA would function as a buyout.

While attendees argued for more LDC meetings open to the public, Harlem resident Mario Mazzoni said, "I'm not concerned about getting more minutes to speak publicly if I'm not being heard."

Along with issues of being ignored, some audience members voiced concern about the demographic makeup of the LDC.

"I think Latinos are underrepresented on this committee," said Community Board 9 member Norma Ramos. Walter South, another CB9 member, expressed concern that few LDC members actually live in the Manhattanville.

Instead of answering questions or responding to the censure of the speakers, the members of the LDC sat behind a table in near silence.

After the forum, Susan Russell, LDC member and chief of staff to Councilman Robert Jackson, D-Washington Heights/West Harlem, defended the group. "These people are saying if the LDC doesn't take eminent domain off of the table, they refuse to negotiate with us on any other issue," she said. "We believe that it is not in the best interests of the community for that to be our starting negotiating position. There are 100,000 people in the community, and if 20 of those people stand up and say eminent domain is the most important issue, that doesn't necessarily make it so."

The forum also featured a series of updates during which LDC members informed those in attendance of the initiatives under consideration by each of its committees. While the LDC has only met to negotiate with Columbia three times, and at this point, nothing has been decided, members were able to discuss areas in which they would like Columbia to provide funding for programs, such as safe waste disposal, arts centers, and affordable housing.

John-Martin Green, the representative of arts and cultural organizations, spoke about integrating Columbia students into the Harlem arts scene, as well as creating and funding an arts school for middle and high school students. Following him, Julio Batista spoke about housing, Maritta Dunn addressed business and economic development, and Cecil Corbin-Mark, program director of WE ACT for Environmental Justice, spoke about the green initiatives and health standards the LDC is looking to incorporate into the benefits agreements.

Columbia Eviction Plans Stir Concern in Harlem

Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2007 05:30:46 -0400
To:
From: "Tenant" tenant@tenant.net
Subject: Jackson hack shows why LDC reps Pols, not People



March 28, 2007 Edition > Section: New York > Printer-Friendly Version
http://www.nysun.com/article/51305

Columbia Eviction Plans Stir Concern in Harlem
By LEORA FALKSpecial to the SunMarch 28, 2007

Columbia University is prepared to serve the first eviction notice to a business in its proposed expansion zone in West Harlem, lawyers for the tenant and a spokeswoman for the university confirmed last night.


The tenant, Juan Javier German, speaking through a translator, addressed the second public meeting of the West Harlem Local Development Corporation, a group formed to represent community interests in negotiations with Columbia over the proposed expansion. He said he had received a letter stating that he would receive an eviction notice if he did not pay $117,000 for rent on his three leased spaces at 3251 Broadway.


Columbia owns the building and has said it would like to relocate the businesses housed there. Members of the Coalition to Preserve Community, a group dedicated to fighting Columbia's expansion, said they were concerned that this was the first step in a series of evictions.


The attorney who represents 3251 Broadway auto center, Phillip Van Buren, said some of the rent backlog was caused by miscommunications and from lost profits because of repairs that Columbia should have made. He asked the LDC to call for "a moratorium on business displacement."


The Columbia spokeswoman, La-Verna Fountain, said she did not know when the official notice would be served, but that it was expected. "He owes $117,000. It's a perfectly reasonable step," she said.


At the LDC's public meeting, representatives gave presentations on goals being sought in negotiations, ranging from the formation of small business retention programs to allowing community access to Columbia's academic facilities.


But during public feedback, most speakers focused on the LDC's decision to continue negotiations even though Columbia is considering the use of eminent domain to acquire property it does not own in the proposed expansion zone.


A civil rights attorney who represents a group of West Harlem tenants, Norman Siegel, told the LDC that "the best interest of this community is to be principled" against eminent domain.


But a member of the LDC, Susan Russell, said refusing to negotiate if eminent domain is still a possibility is counterproductive. She said the people who spoke out at the meeting are not representative of the community as a whole. Ms. Russell, who is chief of staff to City Council Member Robert Jackson, asked: "Where would it leave the community if we didn't negotiate?"

Within CB9, Latinos Underrepresented - Despite Outreach Efforts, Only Five Latinos Serve on Community Board

Home > News

Within CB9, Latinos Underrepresented
Despite Outreach Efforts, Only Five Latinos Serve on Community Board
By Melissa Repko
Issue date: 3/28/07 Section: News

For over a decade, Latino members of Community Board 9 have voiced concerns about the lack of strong Latino representation, saying that a large community of Spanish-speaking individuals in the district has been left relatively voiceless.

With the election of Manhattan borough president Scott Stringer a little over a year ago, many Latino CB9 members said they anticipated change since Stringer ran under a platform of community board reform. Yet on Monday, when this year's appointments were released, not a single new Latino member was chosen for the board.

Only one applicant to CB9 identified him or herself as Latino or Hispanic, said Eric Pugatch, director of communications for Stringer. He added that the office does not discuss the specific reasons why applicants are or are not selected.

Latino members of CB9 authored a letter to Stringer two weeks ago calling for him to appoint more Latino members. The letter was especially motivated by a situation in which Spanish-speaking residents in the district-who live in a building under the Tenant Interim Lease program, which allows residents to gradually purchase a city-owned building-could not communicate effectively with the city. Though residents had saved over $200,000 toward the purchase, the building was being taken out of the program, threatening the status of residents' homes. Michael Palma, a Latino CB9 member, and Jordi Reyes-Montblanc, current CB9 chair, prevented the building from being taken out of the program after serving as translators for the residents.

According to the 2000 census, more than 500,000 Latinos live and work in Manhattan Community District 9 and make up 43.2 percent of the district. But on the board, only five of the 50 members are Latino.

Stringer wrote a response to the letter pledging that he would help CB9 increase the pool of Latino applicants in years to come, and he cited efforts such as translating application packets into Spanish and working with Latino organizations.

Palma said that he has been working for better representation of Latinos along with Reyes-Montblanc since 1992. More Latino members on the board would mean more people available to translate the concerns of Spanish speakers in the district and to better represent the population on issues of immigration.

Palma attributes the low number of Latino board members to a number of factors, including that Latinos in the district-which stretches from 110th to 155th streets-tend to be transient, do not always speak English well, if at all, and are not always aware of what the community board does.

In efforts to encourage Latino involvement, the community board conducted a special informational meeting on Oct. 31 in Spanish. The room was filled with representatives from the New York Fire Department, the Sanitation Department, and other governmental agencies, but only about 10 community members attended. Members of the Community Board and Reyes-Montblanc attributed the low turn-out to Halloween, and Reyes-Montblanc said that he hopes to hold meetings in Spanish once a month or at least every six weeks.

There is no staff member employed by the Community Board who can answer calls in Spanish and otherwise consult with Spanish-speaking residents. Reyes-Montblanc said that there haven't been openings for a staff position during his tenure as chair. He proposed that CB9 create a panel of Spanish-speaking members to hear the concerns of Spanish-speaking constituents.

But in proposing these ideas, Reyes-Montblanc, who is a native Spanish-speaker, also expressed ambivalence about accommodating Spanish-speakers. He said poor representation is not wholly due to the language barrier. "The language of this country is English. The language of New York is English," he said. "Most Hispanics and Latinos are bilingual."

In the past, CB9 had trouble representing the black community in the district, according to long-time Community Board member Maritta Dunn. "The district is changing," she said. "We are beginning to have a major influx of Africans and Asians into the area. In years to come, you are going to see another need to change the demographics of the board."

She said the board has been doing outreach to the Latino community for years and that it has always proved unsuccessful.

"You cannot make a person serve if they do not want to," Dunn said. "It is not the board or the borough president. It's not that the board did not recognize the need. It is that the Hispanic community did not respond to the outreach."

Norma Ramos, a member of the Latino Caucus who has been on the board for the last year, disagreed that Latinos are disinterested and called the sentiment expressed by Dunn "a self-defeating statement."

"It sounds like the excuse white employers would give when they do not want to hire people of color," Ramos said. "That's a very sweeping statement to say about a very diverse community of Latinos. ... I have not seen the kind of effort, the political will, that it requires to let this community know what this board is, what it does, and to get Latinos involved in this decision-making body."

CU Moves to Evict M'ville Auto Shop - First Expansion Zone Eviction Due to Rent Nonpayment

Home > News

CU Moves to Evict M'ville Auto Shop
First Expansion Zone Eviction Due to Rent Nonpayment
By Anna Phillips
Issue date: 3/28/07 Section: News

Columbia plans to evict a Manhattanville autobody shop from a University-owned building, officials confirmed last night.

The eviction, which would be the first of a tenant in the University's proposed expansion zone, is due to non-payment of rent.

According to Philip van Buren, the lawyer for three auto mechanic shops at 3251 Broadway, Columbia informed him on March 23 that it would soon be serving the 3251 Broadway Auto Center, owned by Juan Javier German, with an eviction notice. Once German receives the notice, he will have 30 days to appeal.

Columbia spokeswoman La-Verna Fountain said that German owes Columbia $117,000 in rent arrears, a sum that van Buren and German are contesting. According to van Buren, German actually owes Columbia $39,000, an amount he arrived at by subtracting rent he believes Columbia inflated, rent German has paid but not been credited for, money lost to a flood that destroyed office property, and an estimated $5,500 in moving costs.

The other two auto mechanic shops van Buren represents have both signed relocation leases with Columbia, providing that one business move to a location on 131st Street and the other remain in the basement of 3251 Broadway. Only the 3251 Broadway Auto Center, the largest of the auto mechanic shops, has repeatedly refused to sign a lease for the space Columbia has offered it at 635 West 125th Street. According to Fountain, the upper floors of the building have to be vacated because the elevator has to be taken out of service for safety reasons. She said that Columbia offered German space on the lower floor of the auto center if he could make arrangements to pay his back rent.

"Where they [the other two auto mechanic shops] have signed leases, they have done so under duress," van Buren said, stating that Columbia had not allowed enough time for negotiations and only offered one year leases, "They're a captive audience, they don't have any choice here." He said that Herman did not want to move to the space on 125th Street because it is in the first phase of Columbia's expansion plan, and he would have to vacate it to make way for University development. But he said that German was reconsidering and might sign a one-year lease for the space on 125th Street rather than be evicted.

At a press conference before last night's Local Development Corporation community forum, German stated his case with the aid of a Spanish translator.

"I've got around 20 people working for me and I'm worried they're going to be on the street," German said. "I'm not against Columbia ... I want to negotiate with them, if they allow me to."Unfortunately for German, Columbia has reached the end of its patience for negotiations.

"The bottom line is that we've been working with them and working with them and it hasn't worked out, and they're $117,000 behind in rent," Fountain said. "Our preference would be to work with them and relocate them and he didn't want that."

German and van Buren say that because of scaffolding erected by Columbia for repairs to the building, German's business has lost 80 percent of weekly its revenue and cannot afford to pay its rent. According to van Buren, German has repeatedly asked Columbia to make repairs and the University has not done so, edging the building toward dereliction. He said that while Columbia initially promised that the scaffolding would be removed after three months, it has now been up for fourteen months. "There's been no evidence of actual repair activity," van Buren said.

"The scaffolding stays up for safety reasons and it's going to stay up," Fountain countered.
Because of the University's alleged failure to make repairs, German feels that he should not have to pay complete rent arrears. Van Buren has appealed to the LDC to compel Columbia to continue negotiations and halt the eviction.

"I know Columbia is going to be sensitive to the political impact of this," van Buren said.

Fountain disagreed. "When a tenant owes you $117,000, eviction is a perfectly reasonable next step," she said. "He doesn't want to work with us and he doesn't want to pay his rent ... How many landlords are going to let you just stay for free?"Erin Durkin contributed to this article.

New CB9 Members Appointed - Board Chair Expresses Disappointment With Ethnic Breakdown


New CB9 Members Appointed
Board Chair Expresses Disappointment With Ethnic Breakdown
By Melissa Repko
Issue date: 3/28/07 Section: News

Manhattan borough president Scott Stringer released the names of new members appointed to the island's community boards on Monday.

The appointees included eight new members for Community Board 9, the jurisdiction of which stretches from 110th to 155th streets. The new CB9 members are Debra Byrd, Anthony Fletcher, William Simpkins, Brenda Faust, Don'Angelo Bivens, Eileen Merritt, Carole Singleton, and Charles Loveday.

Each year, half of each community board's membership is chosen. The appointments take effect on April 1. According to a press release from Stringer's office, there were 571 total applicants for positions on the boards, 308 of which were new applicants. There were 101 new appointees selected.

"I am proud to report that the second year of our newly instituted recruitment and appointment process has again resulted in an outstanding group of appointees," Stringer said in the press release. "The quality and total number of this year's pool of applicants was exceptional."

But CB9 chair Jordi Reyes-Montblanc expressed dissatisfaction that no Latinos were among the new CB9 appointees. "I am not surprised. ... I'm just disappointed," he said. "The Latino Hispanic community represents almost 50 percent of the district, and the numbers have not."Eric Pugatch, director of communications for Stringer, said that there was only one Latino applicant for CB9, despite efforts to increase the Latino applicant pool.

"We attempt to make appointments that reflect not only the ethnic diversity of the community but bring much needed skills and expertise to the board," Stringer said in a letter to the CB9 Latino Caucus.

Reyes-Monblanc said that while there are no Latino appointees this year, he believes Stringer will support efforts to increase Latino membership. "I expect to see him do great things for Manhattan and to work with us to do great things in the future," he said.

Tuesday, March 27, 2007

NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ON REVISED QUALIFIED ALLOCATION PLAN FOR LOW INCOME HOUSING TAX CREDITS

From: "My NYC.gov News" MyNYC@nyc.gov
To: m07smith
Sent: Mon, 26 Mar 2007 14:52:59 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ON REVISED QUALIFIED ALLOCATION PLAN FOR LOW INCOME HOUSING TAX CREDITS


March 26, 2007
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ON REVISED QUALIFIED ALLOCATION PLAN FOR LOW INCOME HOUSING TAX CREDITS


Pursuant to Section 42 of the Internal Revenue Code and under the authority of the New York State Executive Order 135, the City of New York, through its Department of Housing Preservation and Development (HPD), hereby announces a public hearing on the City’s 2007 Qualified Allocation Plan (“the Plan”) for allocating federal low income housing tax credits to eligible rental housing projects located in the City of New York.


HPD’s 2007 Plan contains revisions regarding administrative procedures, project financing and development costs, competitive criteria, project underwriting and compliance monitoring. Copies of the Plan will be available from HPD after March 23rd, 2007. A copy can be obtained in person during normal business hours from 9 AM to 5 PM at HPD, 100 Gold Street, Room 9-U8 or on the HPD website at www.nyc.gov/hpd



A public hearing has been scheduled by HPD to obtain comments on the Plan. If you wish to testify at the hearing, you may do so by appearing at the date and time listed below:
Wednesday, April 4th, 2007 10:00 a.m. to 10:30 a.m. 100 Gold Street, Room 1-R


All speakers are encouraged to provide a written copy of their testimony. In addition, persons not speaking at the hearing may submit written comments on or before April, 3rd, 2007 to: HPD, Tax Credit and Compliance Unit, 100 Gold Street, Room 9-U8, New York, NY 10038.
Individuals requesting sign language interpreters should contact the Mayor's Office of Contracts, Public Hearings Unit, 253 Broadway, Room 915, New York, New York 10007, (212) 788-7490, no later than seven (7) business days prior to the public hearing. TDD users should call Verizon relay services.




This is the NYC.gov News You Requested For: Request for Proposals/Qualifications/Offers


To subscribe please go to this link: https://www.nyc.gov/portal/signin.jsp




Comment on this news service PLEASE DO NOT REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE!

Borough President Scott Stringer Announces 2007 Community Board Appointments


Borough President Scott Stringer Announces 2007

Community Board Appointments


Manhattan Borough President Scott M. Stringer recently
made public the names of the 2007 appointees to Manhattan’s 12
Community Boards completing his second year of a revamped
recruitment and appointment process that has resulted in
greater community empowerment throughout the borough.

For complete details and a list of appointees please click here




Borough President Scott Stringer Announces 2007
Community Board Appointments

Second Year of Stringer’s Revamped Recruitment and Appointment Process Results in More than 300 New Applicants, No Unfilled Vacancies
~
33% of Appointees are New Community Board Members

(March 26, 2007) New York, NY - Manhattan Borough President Scott M. Stringer today made public the names of the 2007 appointees to Manhattan’s 12 Community Boards completing his second year of a revamped recruitment and appointment process that has resulted in greater community empowerment throughout the borough. The appointments were again guided by Stringer’s newly implemented set of reforms aimed at depoliticizing the appointment process and making the boards more reflective of the constituencies they serve.

Stringer released the following data pertaining to the 2007 appointment and recruitment process:

Total number of applications: 571
Total number of new applicants: 308
Total number of interviews conducted by the MBPO: 483
Percentage of applicants that received interviews: 85
Total number of new appointees: 101
Total number of re-appointees: 263
Percentage of appointees that are new board members: 33%

In announcing the appointments Borough President Stringer said, “I am proud to report that the second year of our newly instituted recruitment and appointment process has again resulted in an outstanding group of appointees. The quality and total number of this year’s pool of applicants was exceptional. We are witnessing a level of interest and excitement in this unique form of local government that has never before been seen in Manhattan. The result of this excitement is bearing fruit in community based victories across this borough.”

Under the City Charter, the Borough President is charged with appointing all 600 members of Manhattan’s 12 Community Boards; half upon the recommendation of City Council Members. Each year half of the current board membership must apply for reappointment and go through Stringer’s new screening process.

In 2006, Borough President Stringer created an independent screening panel – the Community Board Reform Committee – whose job was to overhaul the appointment process, end ad hoc removals and ultimately review and recommend Community Board applicants to the Borough President. Since their inception, the panel has worked to design a new, more thorough application for potential board members in order to gain a better understanding of applicants to balance the boards with a variety of backgrounds and interests.

Borough President Stringer’s Community Board Reform Committee is comprised of leaders from good government and community groups including: The New York League of Conservation Voters, the Partnership for NYC, the League of Women Voters, the Municipal Art Society, NYPIRG, the Brennan Center for Justice, Citizens Union, the Women’s City Club of New York, the Hispanic Federation, West Harlem Environmental Action, the Regional Planning Association, the NAACP, LGBT Community Center, and the Urban League.

Over the last year Borough President Stringer’s office has taken on an aggressive outreach program that included more than 50 power-point presentations to community groups, religious institutions, businesses and other important groups in the hopes of interesting a cross section of Manhattanites to join their Community Boards. Borough President Stringer credited that outreach effort with the high number of new applicants.

“This process would not have been able to continue growing and succeeding without the work and commitment of Manhattan’s City Council delegation,” Borough President Stringer said. “They have all been active partners in this process and I commend them for their commitment to strengthening this vital form of government.”

Click here for a list of the 2007 Appointees to Manhattan’s 12 Community Boards.

# # #




Community Board Reform



There are twelve Community Boards in the borough of Manhattan—fifty-nine across all of New York City—charged with representing community interests on crucial issues of development and planning, land use, zoning and service delivery. Members of these boards are pivotal designers of their communities, and work to both enhance and preserve the character of the city’s many unique neighborhoods. Each board is equipped with 50 members, a budget, a district manager and staff to be the independent and representative voice of its community.

The Community Board system is also one of the Borough President’s most significant areas of responsibility. All Community Board appointments are made by the Borough President—half of them unilaterally, and half upon recommendation by City Council members. When these boards assess the needs of their communities, the Borough President, in turn, voices those needs to the City and State at large. The power of these boards has, in the past, been underestimated. With the mindset of reform, however, Manhattan’s Community Boards can bring about a new understanding of government by the people and for the people.
At their best, Community Boards are the empowered forces of their neighborhoods, and at his best, the Borough President is their steadfast collaborator. To access this potential, responsibility lies with the Borough President himself to communicate and mobilize a vision of Manhattan’s Community Boards. Manhattan Borough President Scott Stringer is already taking steps towards reforming and empowering Community Boards, steps that will benefit all New Yorkers.

For more information about Community Board Reform, please consult the following:







Community Board Training Institute

The Manhattan Borough President's Community Board Training Institute has held several sessions to inform board members about essential matters like the City Budget process, Land Use procedures, Ethics and Conflicts of Interest, and Parliamentary Procedure. Training guides are accessible below:






Community Boards

How many Community Boards are there?

There are 59 Community Boards throughout the city, with 12 in the borough of Manhattan.


What do Community Boards do?

The City Charter provides Community Boards with specific powers and responsibilities in several areas:

Long-term community planning. Section 197-A of the City Charter authorizes Community Boards to prepare long-term plans for community development. Once the City Planning Commission approves a 197-A plan, it serves as the policy guide for any development or zoning actions taken by the city.

Uniform Land Use Review Procedure (ULURP). Community Boards must be consulted on land use issues, which include the development of municipal facilities, residential buildings, parks and waterfront development. All applications for a change in zoning must first come for review before the Board, which makes a recommendation to the Borough President, who, in turn, makes a recommendation to the City Planning Commission.

Applications for liquor licenses and sidewalk cafes. Bars and restaurants are required to come before Community Boards for advisory rulings on liquor license applications, which are then taken into account for a final determination by the State Liquor Authority. Similarly, applications for sidewalk cafes are presented to Community Boards, which make recommendations on approval to the Department of Consumer Affairs.

Street fairs and street closings. Community Boards make a non-binding recommendation on applications for street fairs and street closings to the Mayor’s Community Assistance Unit.
Community needs in the city budget. The Charter tasks the Community Boards with assessing neighborhood needs, meeting with city agencies and making budget requests to address these local issues. Each Board prepares an annual “District Needs” statement, based on the requests and recommendations of individual Board members and committees.

How many members are on each board?

The twelve Boards in Manhattan consist of up to 50 members—600 borough-wide. All members must have a residential, business, proffesional or other significant interest the community.

How does one become a member?

All Community Board appointments are made by the Borough President—half unilaterally and half on the recommendation of members of the City Council. Borough President Stringer and his staff have revamped the Community Board application and are accepting post-marked applications (required of new applicants and re-appointees alike) until January 31, 2007. Borough President Stringer and his staff have also assembled an independent Community Board Reform Committee that will screen applications, conduct interviews and recommend appointees to the Borough President. By April 1, 2007, the Borough President will announce his appointments for vacant seats on the borough’s Community Boards.

How often do boards meet?

Boards meet once each month. At these meetings, members address items of concern to the community. Board meetings are open to the public, and a portion of each meeting is reserved for the Board to hear from members of the public. Boards regularly conduct public hearings on the City's budget, on land use matters, and other major issues.

How do I find my Community Board?

The official web sites of the various community boards are independent entities, not affiliated with the Manhattan Borough President’s Office or NYC.gov, the Official NYC Web site.



for

Community Board Reform


My greatest power to leverage change in Manhattan comes from the borough itself: most specifically from the twelve Community Boards that represent it. Community Boards are the most local unit of government. Last year, the city spent more than $2.6 million on the operations of Manhattan’s Community Boards. Community Boards are the conscience and voice of our neighborhoods.

The full potential of Community Boards has not yet been realized. Notwithstanding their achievements, these boards have been historically undermined by inefficiencies and a lack of accountability and diversity. A recent examination of Manhattan Community Board operations found that:

The Community Board appointment process is overly politicized and unsystematic;

Community Board funds are distributed inequitably and without review;

Boards operate with ongoing vacancies;

Undisclosed lobbying is commonplace;

Conflicts of interest laws have not been enforced, but rather ignored;
Boards operate without any external requirement of assessment and evaluation.
Why does this matter?

This matters because this is our city, and because in suboptimal conditions we achieve suboptimal results. Efficient and accountable Community Boards would empower Manhattan’s neighborhoods in unprecedented ways, and allow them to cultivate the futures they seek.

My office is taking the initiative to reform and empower Manhattan’s Community Boards. This task is not required of the Borough President, yet it is the bold responsibility my staff and I have assumed in our desire to make Manhattan a place of promise for all its residents.

Some of these reforms are immediate; others will require long-term planning and oversight. Ultimately, however, these reforms will restore each Board to its rightful place on the frontlines of community planning and advocacy. Here are the steps towards reform we are taking:

Revamping Recruitment Efforts to Encourage Community Board Member Applications

To ensure that Board members embody the diversity and expertise necessary to fight for all local residents’ needs, we are strengthening the recruitment and application process. Specialized community liaisons from my office are meeting with a range of groups and community-based organizations throughout the borough to raise awareness of our revitalized Community Boards.
We are handing out applications to everyone interested in becoming a board member.

Establishing an Independent Screening Panel for Board Appointment and Ending ad hoc Removals

My staff and I have formed a Community Board Reform Committee that will function as an independent screening panel for all board applicants. This Committee is comprised of Community-Based Organizations, and is establishing a standard set of criteria by which board applicants will be assessed. Furthermore, just as members are now systematically appointed, they will no longer be removed on an ad hoc basis. In my administration, Community Board Members will be appointed and serve according to merit.
The Community-Based Organizations represented on my screening panel are: The New York League of Conservation Voters, Partnership for NYC, the League of Women Voters, the Municipal Art Society, NYPIRG, the Brennan Center for Justice, Citizen’s Union, the Women’s City Club of NY, the NAACP, the Hispanic Federation, West Harlem Environmental Action, Regional Plan Association, The Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, & Transgender Community Center and the Urban League.


Developing a More Thorough Application Process to Become a Community Board Member

This year, my staff and I hope to have at least 3 applications for every 1 open spot. The process is now more thorough than ever before. We’ve drafted a new application that provides us comprehensive information on applicant backgrounds. This new application will provide the Community Board Reform Committee the means to assemble the most representative and diverse board memberships possible. Each applicant, including those seeking re-appointment, must submit an application to my office, postmarked no later than January 31, 2007.


Incorporating Feedback from the Borough President’s Community Board Questionnaires

Neighborhoods know best. That’s why, immediately following my election, I solicited questionnaires from all of the Community Board Members, District Managers and Chairs to get their feedback on how Community Boards should be reformed. The results gave us key insights into the priorities, satisfactions and dissatisfactions of Manhattan’s Community Boards. We will soon be posting the questionnaire analysis on this website.


Assigning Urban Planners to Support Each Community Board

Given that much of the work conducted by Community Boards revolves around issues of Land Use and planning, we have set in motion a provision of resources to each Community Board with urban planning expertise. My office is establishing an “Urban Fellowship” program with New York City universities so that graduate students in metropolitan studies and urban planning programs can assist the professional, in-house urban planners and gain valuable hands-on experience. Ultimately, every board should have a paid professional urban planner on staff that can support the design of 197-A plans and analysis of land use proposals for long-term community development. This assistance will yield a development plan representative of the community’s needs that can be submitted for approval by the City Planning Commission and the City Council. I am beginning discussions with the Mayor and City Council to secure additional funding to support such full-time planning assistance.


Introducing Legislation to Make Conflicts of Interest Laws Enforceable

Without records of financial interest, the Conflicts of Interest Board (COIB) is forced to rely on the honor system, greatly compromising their ability to regulate potentially harmful conflicts of interest on Community Boards. Our office is working to draft legislation on the state level to allow the COIB to accept a shortened financial disclosure form, which Community Board Chairs can fill out to make the conflicts of interest law enforceable. In the interim, we have updated the Community Board application to include questions regarding conflicts of interest. And as a further measure to promote transparency, members of the public may request to review these applications according to the Freedom of Information Law (FOIL).


Setting Board Budgets to Reflect Their Constituencies

New York City allocates over $12 million dollars a year to the entirety of Community Board budgets. While one Community Board will vary from another in the size and needs of the members of its district, money has not, in the past, been distributed proportionately. Every Community Board has the right, and the mandate, to optimize its effectiveness. For this reason, I am drafting proposals and consulting with the Office of the Mayor, the City Council and my fellow Borough Presidents to provide funding correspondent to the population served by each Community Board.


Providing Ongoing Training and Support for Community Board Members and their Staffs

Following the appointment of Community Board Members, my office will serve as a resource and a guide for the operations of every board. We will work with each Community Board according to its specific needs, and collaborate with them to develop ongoing training services for board staff members on issues including budgeting, land use procedures, conflicts of interest and ethics.


Strengthening Accountability of Community Board Operations

By coordinating with each Community Board office, we will set minimum district requirements as it relates to service delivery and require annual reports addressing board finances, operations and progress. This devoted attention to Manhattan’s Community Boards is unprecedented. And the mobilization, communication and empowerment that will result will be the means by which the promise of New York will be delivered.

Monday, March 26, 2007

Local Democracy in Action: Paris Community Boards Conference

Sun, 25 Mar 2007 19:30:23 +0100
From: "Theo Chino"
To: "J Reyes-Montblanc"
Subject: From Paris. Local Democracy Meeting of Paris Community Boards

Hello Jordi and Sarah,

Attached is a picture taken by Daniel SIMON from Paris in the audience from Paris.

Theo































Local Democracy Conference in Paris
A discussion of local government participation by Paris Community Boards attended by
Hon. Robert Jackson, New York City Council Member and Community Board 9 Manhattan
Member Theo Chino a dual national, France/US.

Monday, March 19, 2007

Ienuso Presents Columbia's Plans for Morningside to CB9 - Board Airs Its Concerns About Neighborhood Development




Ienuso Presents Columbia's Plans for Morningside to CB9
Board Airs Its Concerns About Neighborhood Development

By Alexander Peacocke
Issue date: 3/19/07 Section: News

Correction Appended


Discussion of development in Morningside Heights punctuated the monthly meeting of Manhattan's Community Board 9, held last Thursday night.
Joseph Ienuso, executive vice president of Columbia University Facilities, opened the meeting by presenting information on upcoming Columbia developments in and around Morningside Heights.
"We thought it would be a good idea to make sure you were all aware [of the projects]," Ienuso said. In his address to the assembled board members, Ienuso discussed the proposed changes to McVickar Hall on 113th Street, Knox Hall at Union Theological Seminary, developments to the top of Jerome Green Hall, and the Northwest Corner project.
Initially, some board members were concerned that the University intended to use explosives in the excavation of the Northwest Corner project, a science building set to be constructed where the tennis courts north of Dodge are currently located. While Ienuso said that the University's plan did not specifically call for the use of explosives, he did not rule out the possibility of their use.
"If there is a need for explosives, we would let the community board know," he said.
The meeting also featured addresses from several local activists speaking out against Columbia's Manhattanville expansion plans.
"We are winning the battle against Columbia's plan," Coalition to Preserve Community member Tom Kappner said. He alleged that under Columbia's plan, 4,000 jobs in the proposed area of expansion would be lost.
"We have to keep the WHLDC [West Harlem Development Corporation] on its toes," he added, referring to the group that is negotiating a community benefits agreement with Columbia.
"Its important for us to pose these questions to Columbia University, because it's a bizarre premise they are basing this [expansion] on," said Harlemite Michael Adams, referring to the University's presumption in a document prepared for the state that the area is blighted.
He also disputed claims that West Harlem property owners who have refused to sell to Columbia are simply trying to "extort" money out of the University. "This is what's known as compromise," he said.
CPC leader Tom DeMott took issue with University President Lee Bollinger's language during his appearance on WNYC's Brian Lehrer show on March 8, claiming that his use of the word "outsiders" in reference to Manhattanville business owners, represented the views of the University.
"The Columbia University Business School should be finding a way to help [West Harlem businesses]," he said.
At the meeting, Kim Russell, speaking on behalf of a group of tenants in apartment buildings owned by the Pinnacle Group, also announced the tenants had retained the law firm of Jenner & Block to file a class action lawsuit against the landlord. She said that the tenants would soon be proceeding with the what she called a "very important lawsuit."


CORRECTION: The headline on the original version of this article incorrectly characterized the subject of Ienuso's presentation. He was talking about development in Morningside Heights, not about Manhattanville.

Ienuso Presents Columbia's Plans for Morningside to CB9 - Board Airs Its Concerns About Neighborhood Development




Ienuso Presents Columbia's Plans for Morningside to CB9
Board Airs Its Concerns About Neighborhood Development

By Alexander Peacocke
Issue date: 3/19/07 Section: News

Correction Appended


Discussion of development in Morningside Heights punctuated the monthly meeting of Manhattan's Community Board 9, held last Thursday night.
Joseph Ienuso, executive vice president of Columbia University Facilities, opened the meeting by presenting information on upcoming Columbia developments in and around Morningside Heights.
"We thought it would be a good idea to make sure you were all aware [of the projects]," Ienuso said. In his address to the assembled board members, Ienuso discussed the proposed changes to McVickar Hall on 113th Street, Knox Hall at Union Theological Seminary, developments to the top of Jerome Green Hall, and the Northwest Corner project.
Initially, some board members were concerned that the University intended to use explosives in the excavation of the Northwest Corner project, a science building set to be constructed where the tennis courts north of Dodge are currently located. While Ienuso said that the University's plan did not specifically call for the use of explosives, he did not rule out the possibility of their use.
"If there is a need for explosives, we would let the community board know," he said.
The meeting also featured addresses from several local activists speaking out against Columbia's Manhattanville expansion plans.
"We are winning the battle against Columbia's plan," Coalition to Preserve Community member Tom Kappner said. He alleged that under Columbia's plan, 4,000 jobs in the proposed area of expansion would be lost.
"We have to keep the WHLDC [West Harlem Development Corporation] on its toes," he added, referring to the group that is negotiating a community benefits agreement with Columbia.
"Its important for us to pose these questions to Columbia University, because it's a bizarre premise they are basing this [expansion] on," said Harlemite Michael Adams, referring to the University's presumption in a document prepared for the state that the area is blighted.
He also disputed claims that West Harlem property owners who have refused to sell to Columbia are simply trying to "extort" money out of the University. "This is what's known as compromise," he said.
CPC leader Tom DeMott took issue with University President Lee Bollinger's language during his appearance on WNYC's Brian Lehrer show on March 8, claiming that his use of the word "outsiders" in reference to Manhattanville business owners, represented the views of the University.
"The Columbia University Business School should be finding a way to help [West Harlem businesses]," he said.
At the meeting, Kim Russell, speaking on behalf of a group of tenants in apartment buildings owned by the Pinnacle Group, also announced the tenants had retained the law firm of Jenner & Block to file a class action lawsuit against the landlord. She said that the tenants would soon be proceeding with the what she called a "very important lawsuit."


CORRECTION: The headline on the original version of this article incorrectly characterized the subject of Ienuso's presentation. He was talking about development in Morningside Heights, not about Manhattanville.

CBA "watchdog" sought to ensure "history making" benefits "for local community"

Atlantic Yards Report
This blog offers analysis, commentary, and reportage about Forest City Ratner's proposed $4 billion Atlantic Yards project, the largest ever in Brooklyn, to build a basketball arena plus at least 16 high-rise buildings. It follows up on my 9/1/05 report on New York Times coverage of the project and the TimesRatnerReport blog (links below).

Monday, March 19, 2007

CBA "watchdog" sought to ensure "history making" benefits "for local community"

Two yet-to-be-hired Atlantic Yards monitors will be paid by developer Forest City Ratner (FCR), but it's important to keep the two straight.

The more important one will be an Environmental Monitor (EM)--the process is already behind schedule--hired by the Empire State Development Corporation (ESDC) to oversee construction activities, environmental mitigations, and much more. Residents concerned about communications difficulties have already urged the ESDC to put construction on hold until such a monitor is hired.

Enter the ICM

Meanwhile, Forest City wants you to know about another monitor, an Independent Compliance Monitor (ICM) that is part of the Atlantic Yards Community Benefits Agreement (CBA).

(According to the CBA, which was signed in June 2005, the ICM was supposed to be sought "as soon as reasonably practicable after formation of the Executive Committee," as I wrote last August. The term "reasonably practicable" apparently means March 2007.)

"Watchdog" sought

A press release issued last week by a Forest City Ratner-paid public relations firm was headlined "ATLANTIC YARDS CBA COALITION SEEKS INDEPENDENT COMPLIANCE MONITOR: 'Watchdog' To Ensure Community Benefits for Local Community and Residents."

The RFP for the monitor is managed by the same firm, the Darman Group, hired by Forest City to vet minority- and women-owned businesses to work on the project. Given the reference to the "historic Atlantic Yards CBA" (right), it's a good bet that the Darman Group and its funders won't be raising any questions about the CBA.

The press release states: As outlined in the CBA, the ICM will be responsible for ensuring that all benchmarks for the initiatives in the CBA are met and completed, including the affordable housing, workforce development - consisting of the development of job training programs - inclusion of minority and women-owned enterprises in all phases of the construction and hiring of women and minority workers during the construction.

"The ICM will work with all parties to ensure the goals stated in the CBA are reached and provide an independent third party to mediate any disagreements should they arise," said Delia Hunley-Adossa, Chair of the Executive Committee.

Hunley-Adossa represents Brooklyn Endeavor Experience, formerly First Atlantic Terminal Housing Committee (FATCH), a group which apparently has done little more than testify in favor of the project.

The CBA states: The terms of employment and evaluation shall be determined by the Executive Committee. Given that the Executive Committee supports the project and, unlike the ESDC, is not subject to any further oversight, is there reason to think that the monitor would be truly independent?

The New York Observer last month reported criticism from an opponent of Columbia University's development plan: “Ratner and the city got together with one big, national not-for-profit and a set of local sycophants and put something together which doesn’t seem to have satisfied too many people, except for those who are benefiting directly from it,” Mr. [Jordi] Reyes-Montblanc, the chairman of Community Board 9, said.

Affordable housing delay?

Perhaps the first question is whether the ICM would question the pace of the project.

After all, no one from ACORN, which presumably signed the CBA expecting that the promised 2250 units of affordable housing to be delivered in ten years, has mentioned public statements by the developer and supporters that the project could take 15 or 20 years.

In-house discretion

Unmentioned in the press release is that FCR would fund the ICM, according to the CBA, with "an annual payment of up to $100,000 to be paid by the Project Developer.

"Responses are due by 4/25/07. While the initial contract term will be two years, the Executive Committee of the CBA "will have the option to extend the contract term at its sole discretion," according to the RFP.

The CBA suggests but does not specify that an ICM would continue through the life of the agreement, which is up to 30 years from the "commencement of construction of the first residential building" or if "the Developers abandon their efforts to acquire or lease from the Metropolitan Transportation Authority and to obtain a rezoning of the Project site for large-scale development." (Fun fact: it's never been a rezoning.)

Looking at the RFP

In the RFP for the monitor, the term "history making" also gets prominence:...Forest City Ratner Companies... executed a history making Community Benefits Agreement (the “Agreement”) with a coalition of eight (8) community based organizations. (Emphasis added)

The Darman Group staffer to whom responses should be sent is Hallene Condon, a Queens resident who last year contributed to Atlantic Yards supporter Roger Green's bid for the House of Representatives, which turned into a spoiler race taking votes from Atlantic Yards opponent Charles Barron.

What the ICM might do

The job of the ICM is parceled out into several tasks, some trivial, some more central. It's as if the writer of the RFP was unwilling to consolidate tasks.

Task I
The ICM should establish a clear understanding of the scope, schedule, intricacies and programmatic goals of each phase of the project as set forth in the CBA, a copy of which is attached hereto and made a part hereof.

This would seem to be inherent in the job.

Task II
The ICM shall meet with each of the Executive Committee members to clearly define such member’s individual areas of responsibility as prescribed in the CBA, including with respect to its Governing Council. The ICM will also analyze and measure how these areas of responsibility or lack of fulfillment of such obligations will impact the goals and objectives of the CBA.

Apparently, this means someone will find out what the Executive Committee members are supposed to do.

Task III
The ICM shall meet with the Executive Committee members to clearly define such members’ obligations and responsibilities, as prescribed in the CBA, as a whole toward the effective implementation of the entire CBA. The ICM shall develop quantitative and qualitative measurements of such compliance with the goals outlined in the CBA and evaluate the adherence to the time-lines for the completion of the goals set forth in therein.

This seems somewhat redundant, but it apparently involves setting benchmarks.

Task IV
ICM shall analyze all the initiatives and obligations that are set forth in the CBA and develop a strategy which clearly defines and measures whether compliance objectives set forth in the CBA are being achieved. The ICM shall develop a format for reporting on compliance with the CBA and its initiatives and establish a frequency for such reports.

This apparently involves measuring performance against those benchmarks.

Task V
The ICM shall deliver 10 copies of all reports to the Executive Committee and 2 copies to the Downtown Brooklyn Advisory and Oversight Committee (DBAOC). The execution of all of the above tasks may run concurrently.

This means that the ICM will have access to a copy machine and the U.S. Mail.

Mitigation--CBA vs. ESDC

A closer look at the CBA shows that the monitor hired by the ESDC will have a much greater role than the ICM. Take the question of environmental impacts, which the CBA mentions but then defers to the state.

According to the CBA:
Developers shall consult with FATHC to determine appropriate mitigation measures that will address the concerns of the Community regarding environmental impacts caused by the development of the Arena and the Project, including, but not limited to: an on-site and off-site rodent abatement program; a staging plan for construction that minimizes the effects of idling trucks; a pedestrian and vehicular traffic plan; and encouragement of all contractors to use low sulfur diesel in trucks operating at the Project. In addition, the Developers shall adopt prudent environmentally sound building practices that will take into consideration the goal of promoting sustainable development in an energy efficient manner. The Developers shall notify the Coalition of their ongoing plans and mitigation measures. It is understood that the Project’s environmental impact statement and review process is administered by the State. All potential environmental mitigation measures, the cost to implement such measures, and the party deemed responsible for their compliance is ultimately determined by the State. Therefore, the Developer shall be in compliance with this Agreement by following the state mandated process. (Emphasis added)

Regarding compliance, the CBA cites mediation and potential court action--except that the state-mandated process would seem to trump that.

The ESDC's monitor

Contrast the seven-page ICM RFP with the 28-page RFP for the ESDC's Environmental Monitor. The tasks for that job include:
1. Compliance with the specific measures to protect historic buildings near the Project site from being potentially damaged as a result of construction activities;

2. Implementation of environmental investigation and remediation measures and construction techniques pertaining to the management of asbestos, PCB-containing equipment, petroleum and other hazardous substances (including contaminated soils and groundwater) in a manner that complies with all applicable laws and regulations and will protect workers and the general public from adverse impacts associated with these environmental conditions, including implementation of a Construction Health and Safety Plan during remediation and excavation and a Community Air Monitoring Plan during excavation;

3. Numerous specific measures to reduce the effects of the Project’s construction on traffic conditions, air quality and noise, including the scheduling of truck deliveries, the use of designated truck routes, the use of on-site staging areas to reduce queueing on City streets, provision of an appropriate amount of on-site construction worker parking spaces, the use of equipment that meets the sound level standards specified in the New York City Noise Code or more stringent specified performance standards, scheduling construction to reduce noise impacts during evenings and weekends, situating noisy equipment away from the sidewalk were feasible, construction of noise barriers, use of quality mufflers, proper maintenance of equipment, provision of double-glazed windows and alternative ventilation to certain buildings near the project site, use of quiet construction techniques where feasible, use of dust suppression measures, use of electric-powered rather than diesel-powered equipment where feasible, limiting vehicle idling, use of ultra-low sulfur diesel fuel for all equipment with diesel engines, use and proper maintenance of best available tailpipe emission reduction technologies, location of stationary engines away from the sidewalk where feasible, and preparation and implementation of a construction air quality compliance plan;4. Implementation of a rodent control program during construction activities;

5. Implementation of measures to retain and detain stormwater to meet certain performance standards with respect to Project-related combined sewer overflows;

6. Use of low emission boilers for the Project buildings and location of the HVAC vents in certain locations to protect outdoor and indoor air quality; and

7. Implementation of incentives to reduce traffic demand associated with operation of the Project to reduce the overall number of vehicles coming to the arena for a Nets basketball games.

That's a lot more to do.

Enforcement murky

Still, the memo (p. 28) establishing the Environmental Monitor sets out a vague description of enforcement, with no specific penalties or arbitrator:

1. The Project Documentation shall provide that ESDC shall have the right to enforce FCRC’s compliance with the commitments set forth above.

2. ESDC shall have the right to enter the Project site at all reasonable times, subject to safety and operational constraints, to monitor FCRC’s and FCRC’s contractors’ compliance with the terms of such commitments.

3. FCRC and FCRC’s general contractor shall meet with ESDC, at ESDC’s request, to discuss the compliance and implementation of the obligations and measures set forth in this memorandum.


What "community"?

While the ICM press release emphasizes the benefits to the "local community and residents," it's not quite clear what "community" means.

The CBA offers several definitions of "community":
“Community” means: the borough of Brooklyn, New York City, inclusive of the Neighboring Community and Surrounding Community, as herein defined.“Neighboring Community” means: Community Boards 2, 6 and 8 within the borough of Brooklyn, New York City.

“Surrounding Community” means: the two-mile radius of the Project site within Brooklyn.


So far, however, the most important criterion for preliminary site work is status as a minority- or woman-owned enterprise, not "community" status.

According to a press release issued by Forest City Ratner regarding pre-construction work for the Atlantic Yards project, The largest of these contracts were awarded to the woman-owned demolition firm A. Russo Wrecking to remove the MTA bus parking facility on the east side of the track and the minority-owned security firm Eddington & Associates. Other contracts went to J&J Asbestos Abatement Corp., C & W Cleaning, JMV Associates and Cole Consulting....

Demolition [at 179 Flatbush] will be performed by
Cole Partners, a minority-owned firm, with construction management services provided by Gateway Demolition. Air monitoring during and after abatement was conducted by Safety Environmental, also a minority-owned firm. (Links added)

According to a second press release:
Jobie Demolition & Contracting, a Brooklyn-based minority-owned firm; Sukram & Sons Trucking Ltd, a minority-owned firm; and Cole Partners, a Brooklyn-based minority-owned firm, have been contracted to remove the structures.

Of the firms, three (J&J, Cole Partners, and Jobie Demolition) are from Brooklyn, two are from Nassau County (Russo and Sukram), and one each are from Queens (JMV), Staten Island (Safety Environmental), the Bronx (Eddington), and Westchester (Cole Consulting) counties. (I'm not certain about C&W, but it may be this Brooklyn firm.)

If the outer counties are defined as the "community," maybe the Community Benefits Agreement should not have been "negotiated" only by six mainly-black groups from Central Brooklyn, the New York State Association of Minority Contractors, plus the New York branch of the national housing group ACORN.

The CBA states: the Coalition and the Developers seek to maximize the benefits of the Project to residents of Brooklyn, as well as minority and women construction, professional and operational workers and business owners and thereby to encourage systemic changes in the traditional ways of doing business on large urban development projects

Maybe the work so far represents systemic change. Then again, as I wrote, hiring an architect who's already working on towers in Brooklyn doesn't exactly represent systemic change.

# posted by Norman Oder @ 6:32 AM

Saturday, March 17, 2007

City Council Calendar for Monday, March 19, 2007 - Sunday, March 25, 2007

Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2007 17:32:29 -0400 (EDT)
From: "NYC Council Legislative Update"
To: reysmont@yahoo.com
Subject: City Council Calendar for Monday, March 19, 2007 - Sunday, March 25, 2007

City Council Calendar for Monday, March 19, 2007 - Sunday, March 25, 2007


- - - - - Immigration Issues: Council votes to Support the Uniting American
Families Act, Members Participate on Immigration Rally at City Hall
- - - - -

On Wednesday, March 14th, the Council voted to call upon the United States
Congress to pass the Uniting American Families Act (UAFA) that would allow citizens
and legal permanent residents in bi-national same-sex relationships to sponsor
their foreign-born partner for immigration benefits. Also, on Thursday, many
Council Members participated in a rally promoting immigrants’ rights,
including Council Members Martinez, Stewart, James, Reyna, and Gonzalez.

The New York City Council wants to know your opinion about immigration issues.
You may contact Speaker Christine C. Quinn at:
http://www.nyccouncil.info/rightnow/contactspkr.cfm

- - - - - Legislative Calendar - - - - -

** Meetings for Monday, March 19, 2007 **

Committee(s) on: Education
10:00 AM. Council Chambers - City Hall
New York City Council Fiscal Year 2008 Preliminary Budget, Mayor's FY '07
Preliminary Management Report and Agency Oversight Hearings
10:00 a.m. - Department of Education (Expense)
12:00 p.m. * Public

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

** Meetings for Tuesday, March 20, 2007 **

Subcommittee(s) on: Zoning & Franchises
9:30 AM. Committee Room - City Hall
See Land Use Calendar Available Thursday, March 15, 2007 in Room 5 City Hall

Committee(s) on: Public Safety
10:00 AM. Council Chambers - City Hall
New York City Council Fiscal Year 2008 Preliminary Budget, Mayor's FY '07
Preliminary Management Report and Agency Oversight Hearings
10:00 a.m. - Police Department
12:00 p.m. - Office of Emergency Management
12:45 p.m. - District Attorneys/Special Narcotics Prosecutor
2:00 p.m. - Civilian Complaint Review Board
3:00 p.m. * Public

Subcommittee(s) on: Landmarks, Public Siting & Maritime Uses
11:00 AM. Committee Room - City Hall
Chairperson(s): Jessica S. Lappin
See Land Use Calendar Available Thursday, March 15, 2007 in Room 5 City Hall

Committee(s) on: Aging
1:00 PM. Committee Room - City Hall
New York City Council Fiscal Year 2008 Preliminary Budget, Mayor's FY '07
Preliminary Management Report and Agency Oversight Hearings
1:00 p.m. - Department For The Aging (joint with the subcommittee on Senior
Centers)
2:00 p.m. * Public

Subcommittee(s) on: Planning, Dispositions & Concessions
1:00 PM. Hearing Room - 250 Broadway, 16th Floor
See Land Use Calendar Available Thursday, March 15, 2007 in Room 5 City Hall

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

** Meetings for Wednesday, March 21, 2007 **

-- no public meetings scheduled --

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

** Meetings for Thursday, March 22, 2007 **

Committee(s) on: Standards & Ethics
10:00 AM. Council Chambers - City Hall
New York City Council Fiscal Year 2008 Preliminary Budget, Mayor's FY '07
Preliminary Management Report and Agency Oversight Hearings
10:00 a.m. - Conflicts of Interest Board
10:45 a.m. * Public

Committee(s) on: Land Use
10:00 AM. Committee Room - City Hall
Chairperson(s): Melinda R. Katz
All items reported out of the subcommittees
AND SUCH OTHER BUSINESS AS MAY BE NECESSARY

Committee(s) on: Mental Health, Mental Retardation, Alcoholism, Drug Abuse &
Disability Services
12:00 PM. Council Chambers - City Hall
New York City Council Fiscal Year 2008 Preliminary Budget, Mayor's FY '07
Preliminary Management Report and Agency Oversight Hearings

12:00 p.m. - Department of Health & Mental Hygiene (joint with Subcommittee on
Drug Abuse)
1:30 p.m. * Public

Committee(s) on: Parks & Recreation
12:00 PM. Committee Room - City Hall
New York City Council Fiscal Year 2008 Preliminary Budget, Mayor's FY '07
Preliminary Management Report and Agency Oversight Hearings
12:00 p.m. - Department of Parks & Recreation
1:30 p.m. - Public

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

** Meetings for Friday, March 23, 2007 **

-- no public meetings scheduled --

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

** Meetings for Saturday, March 24, 2007 **

-- no public meetings scheduled --

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

** Meetings for Sunday, March 25, 2007 **

-- no public meetings scheduled --



More information at http://www.nyccouncil.info/rightnow/calendarpage.cfm

This is the City Council news you requested for: Council Legislative Calendar
Email Updates

Note: The City Council list serve is now being powered by NYC.gov

To subscribe, please go to this link:
https://www.nyc.gov/portal/signin.jsp

Comment on this news service:
http://www.nyc.gov/html/misc/html/council_news_feedback.html

PLEASE DO NOT REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE!

Tuesday, March 13, 2007

TESTIMONY OF COMMUNITY BOARD No. 9 MANHATTAN - Public Scoping Hearing - The City College of NY Science Building Phase I and II March 13, 2007


TESTIMONY OF COMMUNITY BOARD No. 9 MANHATTAN

Public Scoping Hearing

The City College of NY Science Building Phase I and II
Date: March 13, 2007





The following testimony is submitted by Community Board No.9 Manhattan (CB9M) in response to The City College of New York Science Building and The City University of New York Advanced Science research Center Phases I and II Project.

First and foremost we are proud to have the existence of The City College of New York within the confines of CB9M. Such a highly respected public educational institution is of great value to our community. Our community is richer and stronger as a result off being the home for major institutions such as The City College of New York.

We must however admonish City College for not being forthcoming and sharing with the community and specifically with CB9M, its’ plans for development and growth. As a public institution and a City of New York dependency City College has the City Charter mandated responsibility of consulting with CB9M; such practices has not been the behavior of City College and it must be corrected. And though the proposed project is as of right and needs no regulatory approval from CB9M, respect and adherence to the City Charter that calls for consultation with CB9M is expected.

With respect to the project at hand, we are further disappointed that there has not been a more inclusive and transparent engagement process with the wider community and the student body of City College, especially when we read that the Dormitory Authority in its’ notice of this public scoping session, states that as the lead agency they have “determined that the proposed project … may have a significant effect on the environment”. Further, when the proposed project is linked to the planned placement of a transformer in the North Academic Center which will supply service to the proposed project and mean diminished space within the Cohen Library not to mention the potential hazards posed by its’ installation and usage, and where CUNY is asking DASNY’S authorization of the expenditure of tax-exempt bond to finance this project, then most certainly, a much more respectful, transparent and inclusive engagement process is absolutely warranted.

Specific to the plans for the erecting of the proposed City College Science Building and the CUNY Advanced Science Research Center Facility Phases I and II we pose the following questions and concerns.

1. Why is the institution proposing the installation of a transformer on the first floor of the NAC building to support the new buildings instead of placing the transformer encased underground at the new developments at the South Campus?

In the description of the usage of Advances Science Research Center II Building it is stated that, no programming is in place and that, “The exact nature of the research to be performed is unknown and may change over time as new research initiatives are developed.” Is the College considering leasing to any outside entity in the future to conduct biological testing and would Columbia University by chance be one such institution?

With respect to Green building designs the proposal states, “It is anticipated that the Proposed Project would incorporate green building design standards such as those leading to certification under LEED Green Building Rating System.” Though it is clear that certification is not being sought, what level of certification would the project aim to reach under LEED certification standards?

A key requirement for the building of these structures is the demolition of the existing outdoor athletic track and field facility. This, we are sure will have significant impact on the athletic program of City College as well as A Phillip Randolph High Schools’ athletic program, and will place added burden on limited number of outdoor public athletic fields in the community that are already over utilized. It is important to also note that while the development of facilities to develop the mind or our students are important, the physical development of each student is equally important to creating a balanced individual.

With regard to the New York Structural Biology Center and the concerns in relation to its’ close proximity to the proposed development parcel which could result in its operations being affected during construction and has raised the issue of possibility of employing the State’s powers of eminent domain. We urge that there be another course of action. The action of eminent domain bantered around with such ease in this climate in our District and indeed the country is sensitive and should be an action of last resort. Why not the use a letter of guarantee for all risk and damages assuming full replacement cost and ancillary expenses should there be any damages incurred.

CB9M also, due to the size and scope of this project, shares many other similar concerns as does the Dormitory Authority regarding this project such as the construction impacts, shadows, urban design and visual resources, archaeological and historic resources, energy, air quality, noise, and open space. Further, there are the issues of added increase traffic, other transportation issues and parking on an already narrow avenue in an over-populated District. Further, the safety of the children attending the closely adjacent Day Care Program located within the Schiff Building is of great concern.

Clearly, this project raises numerous amounts of concerns and dictates and requires a cooperative and inclusive development process that must provide answers and assurances to the community before public funds are expended to finance any or all of the project. Again, we urge The City College of New York to reach out to CB9M, the wider community, and its’ student body and make this process one that can meet the needs and address the concerns of all involved.

Respectfully Submitted




Yvonne Stennett
Co-Chair Housing, Land Use & Zoning
For and On Behalf of
J. Reyes-Montblanc
CB9M Chairman


cc: Hon. Michael Bloomberg, Mayor of the City of New York
Hon. Betsy Gotbaum, Public Advocate
Hon. Scott Stringer, Manhattan Borough President
Hon. Bill Perkins, NYS Senator
Hon. Keith L.T. Wright, NYS Assembly Member
Hon. Daniel O’Donnell, NYS Assembly member
Hon. Robert Jackson, NYC Council Member
Hon. Inez Dickens, NYC Council Member
CB9M Executive Committee and Members

Monday, March 12, 2007

City Council Calendar for Monday, March 12, 2007 - Sunday, March 18, 2007

Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2007 16:20:27 -0400 (EDT)
From: "NYC Council Legislative Update" legcalendar@council.nyc.ny.us
To: reysmont@yahoo.com
Subject: City Council Calendar for Monday, March 12, 2007 - Sunday, March 18, 2007

City Council Calendar for Monday, March 12, 2007 - Sunday, March 18, 2007

- - - Council, Faith Based groups partner to combat hunger - - - - -
In a major step forward for the City Council's campaign to increase access to
healthy food, Speaker Christine C. Quinn announced that faith-based
organizations will join the Council's efforts to fight obesity and increase food stamp
participation. The new partnership will result in increased outreach and more
focused efforts to help New Yorkers access healthy food. With over one million New
Yorkers utilizing emergency food programs to access food each year, the problem
of hunger has reached a crisis point.

Learn more at http://www.nyccouncil.info
Do you have thoughts about the Food Today, Healthy Tomorrow campaign or about
how NYC should address Hunger and Nutrition issues?
Contact the speaker at http://www.nyccouncil.info/rightnow/contactspkr.cfm

- - - - - Legislative Calendar - - - - -
Monday, March 12, 2007
Committee(s) on: Education
10:00 AM, Council Chambers - City Hall
New York City Council Fiscal Year 2008 Preliminary Budget, Mayor's FY '07
Preliminary Management Report and Agency Oversight Hearings
10:00 a.m. - Department of Education and School Construction Authority
(Capital)
12:00 p.m. - Public

Committee(s) on: Health
10:00 AM, Committee Room - City Hall
New York City Council Fiscal Year 2008 Preliminary Budget, Mayor's FY '07
Preliminary Management Report and Agency Oversight Hearings
10:00 a.m. - Medical Examiner
10:30 a.m. - Department of Health & Mental Hygiene
12:30 p.m. - Health & Hospitals Corporation (joint with Task Force on Hospital
Closings)
2:00 p.m. - Public
Committee(s) on: Youth Services
11:00 AM, Hearing Room - 250 Broadway, 14th Floor
Proposed Int 341-A - A Local Law to amend the administrative code of the city
of New York, in relation to prohibiting the use of non-wood bats.
- - - - - - - - - - - -
Tuesday, March 13, 2007
Committee(s) on: Fire & Criminal Justice Services
10:00 AM, Council Chambers - City Hall
New York City Council Fiscal Year 2008 Preliminary Budget, Mayor's FY '07
Preliminary Management Report and Agency Oversight Hearings
10:00 a.m. - Criminal Justice Coordinator (Indigent Defense Services)
11:00 a.m. - Legal Aid
12:00 p.m. - Fire/Emergency Medical Service
2:00 p.m. - Department of Probation
2:30 p.m. - Department of Correction
3:00 p.m. - Public

Committee(s) on: Consumer Affairs
10:00 AM, Committee Room - City Hall
New York City Council Fiscal Year 2008 Preliminary Budget, Mayor's FY '07
Preliminary Management Report and Agency Oversight Hearings
10:00 a.m. - Department of Consumer Affairs
11:00 a.m. - Business Integrity Commission
11:30 a.m. - Public

Committee(s) on: Environmental Protection
1:00 PM, Committee Room - City Hall
New York City Council Fiscal Year 2008 Preliminary Budget, Mayor's FY '07
Preliminary Management Report and Agency Oversight Hearings
1:00 p.m. - Department of Environmental Protection (Capital)
2:15 p.m. - Department of Environmental Protection (Expense)
3:30 p.m. - Public
- - - - - - - - - - - -
Wednesday, March 14, 2007
Committee(s) on: Rules, Privileges & Elections
T10:00 AM, Council Chambers - City Hall
Preconsidered Res____ - Resolution approving Membership Changes to Certain
Standing Committees and Subcommittees. AND SUCH OTHER BUSINESS AS MAY BE NECESSARY

Committee(s) on: General Welfare
10:15 AM, Committee Room - City Hall
Proposed Int 501-A - A Local Law to amend the administrative code of the city
of New York, in relation to domestic partnerships.4

Committee(s) on: Transportation
10:30 AM, Committee Room - City Hall
Proposed Int 24-A - A Local Law to amend the administrative code of the city of
New York, in relation to bicycles used for commercial purposes.
Proposed Int 58-A - A Local Law to amend the administrative code of the city of
New York, in relation to requiring that businesses that use bicycle operators
and delivery services that dispatch bicycle operators post signs at the place of
employment detailing proper bicycle safety procedures.

Committee(s) on: Health
10:45 AM,Committee Room - City Hall
Int 517 - A Local Law to amend the administrative code of the City of New York,
in relation to prohibiting the use of artificial trans fats by food service
establishments and mobile food unit commissaries.

Committee(s) on: Governmental Operations
11:00 AM, Committee Room - City Hall
Proposed Res 131-A - Resolution urging the New York State Board of Elections to
promptly certify Precinct Based/Optical Scan voting systems for procurement by
the local Boards of Elections and urging the New York City Board of Elections
to select a Precinct Based/Optical Scan system as the new voting technology for
the City of New York.
Stated Council Meeting
Ceremonial Tributes - 1:00 p.m.
Agenda - 1:30 p.m.
- - - - - - - - - - - -
Thursday, March 15, 2007
Committee(s) on: General Welfare
10:00 AM, Council Chambers - City Hall
New York City Council Fiscal Year 2008 Preliminary Budget, Mayor's FY '07
Preliminary Management Report and Agency Oversight Hearings
10:00 a.m. - Human Resources Administration / Department of Social Services
12:00 p.m. - Administration for Children's Services (Agency for Child
Development) jointly with Womens Issues Committee
2:00 p.m. - Department of Homeless Services
3:15 p.m. - Public

Committee(s) on: Civil Rights
10:00 AM, Committee Room - City Hall
Details: New York City Council Fiscal Year 2008 Preliminary Budget, Mayor's
FY '07 Preliminary Management Report and Agency Oversight Hearings
10:00 a.m. - Human Rights Commission
10:45 a.m. - Public

Committee(s) on: Juvenile Justice
11:30 AM, Committee Room - City Hall
New York City Council Fiscal Year 2008 Preliminary Budget, Mayor's FY '07
Preliminary Management Report and Agency Oversight Hearings
11:30 a.m. - Department of Juvenile Justice
12:15 p.m. - Public

Committee(s) on: Cultural Affairs, Libraries & International Intergroup
Relations
1:00 PM, Committee Room - City Hall
New York City Council Fiscal Year 2008 Preliminary Budget, Mayor's FY '07
Preliminary Management Report and Agency Oversight Hearings
1:00 p.m. - Department of Cultural Affairs
2:30 p.m. - Libraries (joint with Select Committee on Libraries)
4:00 p.m. - Public
- - - - - - - - - - - -
Friday, March 16, 2007
Committee(s) on: Higher Education
10:00 AM, Council Chambers - City Hall
New York City Council Fiscal Year 2008 Preliminary Budget, Mayor's FY '07
Preliminary Management Report and Agency Oversight Hearings
10:00 a.m. - City University of New York
11:30 a.m. - Public

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

More information at http://www.nyccouncil.info/rightnow/calendarpage.cfm
This is the City Council news you requested for: Council Legislative Calendar
Email Updates
Note: The City Council list serve is now being powered by NYC.gov
To unsubscribe, please go to this link:
https://www.nyc.gov/portal/signin.jsp
Comment on this news service:
http://www.nyc.gov/html/misc/html/council_news_feedback.html
PLEASE DO NOT REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE!

COMMUNITY BOARD No. 9 MANHATTAN: LIST OF BOARD MEMBERS & COMMITTEES [Revised 12Mar07]

Originally Posted 2Jul06 (Revised 12Mar07)

COMMUNITY BOARD No. 9 MANHATTAN
www.cb9m.org

LIST OF BOARD MEMBERS
&
COMMITTEE ASSIGNMENT



NAME OF MEMBER & COMMITTTEES

Hon. Jane Arrandell:
Uniform Services & Transportation

Hon. Callie Branche:
Housing, Land Use & Zoning,
Manhattanville Rezoning Taskforce

Hon. Sandra Carter:
Youth/Education & Libraries

Hon. Johnny Celestin: RESIGNED 31Mar07
Piers & Waterfront, Economic Development & Consumer Affairs
Chairman's Representative to the Borough Presidents Citizenship and Immigration Task Force

Hon. Theo Chino:
Uniform Services & Transportation Committee

Hon. Cecil Corbin-Mark:
Health Human Services & Environmental
By-Laws

Hon. Carlotta Damanda: Parliamentarian
Youth/Education & Libraries,
Executive Committee (ex officio)

Hon. Maritta Dunn:
Chair: Piers & Waterfront/Economic Development & Consumer Affairs,
Executive Committee
197A,
Manhattanville Rezoning Taskforce

Hon. Tamara Gayer:
Housing, Land Use & Zoning,
Manhattanville Rezoning Taskforce
Arts & Culture

Hon. Vicky Gholson, PhD.:
Piers & Waterfront/Economic Development & Consumer Affairs,
Arts & Culture

Hon. Christa Giesecke:
Parks & Recreation /Landmarks & Preservation
Arts & Culture

Hon. Cora Gilmore:
Health Human Services & Environmental,
Senior Issues

Hon. George Goodwill:
Health Human Services & Environmental
Chairman's Representative to Harlem Hospital Advisory Board

Hon. Deidra E. Govan-Legrand: RESIGNED 31Mar07
Piers & Waterfront/Economic Development & Consumer Affairs

Hon. Margaret Ann Jacobs:
Youth/Education & Libraries

Hon. Tisha Jackson, Esq.:
Housing, Land Use & Zoning,
Manhattanville Rezoning Taskforce

Hon. Ralph Jackson, MD:
Health, Human Services & Environmental

Hon. Ramona Jennett: Assistant Secretary,
Executive Committee
Co-Chair: Youth, Education & Libraries
197A,
Manhattanville Rezoning Taskforce

Hon. Michelle Jewell:
Youth/Education & Libraries

Hon. Jeanine R. Johnson, Esq.:
Uniformed Services & Transportation

Hon. Patricia Jones: Board 2nd Vice Chair
Executive Committee
Chair: 197A Plan
Co-Chair: Manhattanville Rezoning Taskforce
Parks & Recreation/Landmarks & Preservation,

Hon. Carolyn Kent:
Co-Chair: Parks & Recreation/Landmarks & Preservation
Executive Committee
197A,
Manhattanville Rezoning Taskforce

Hon. Theodore Kovaleff: Secretary
Executive Committee
Co-Chair: Uniformed Services/Transportation,
197A,
Manhattanville Rezoning Taskforce

Hon. Christina Lee, Esq.:
Co-Chair, Health/Human Services & Environmental,
Co-Chair, By-Laws,
Executive Committee
197A

Hon. Patricia Lewis:
Health Human Services & Environmental,
Housing, Land Use & Zoning,
Manhattanville Rezoning Taskforce
Senior Issues

Hon. Frances Mack:
Parks & Recreation/ Landmarks & Preservation

Hon. Winston Majette:
Youth/Education & Libraries

Hon. Barbara Marshall: Treasurer,
Executive Committee
Co-Chair, Youth/Education & Libraries
197A,
Manhattanville Rezoning Taskforce

Hon. Savona Bailey McClain:
Co-Chair: Arts & Culture
Executive Committee
Parks & Recreation/Landmarks & Preservation
Piers & Waterfront/Economic Development & Consumer Affairs
197A,
Manhattanville Rezoning Taskforce

Hon. Keith Mitchell:
Uniformed Services & Transportation

Hon. Martha Norrick:
Uniform Services & Transportation

Hon. Blaine Sharon North:
Piers & Waterfront/Economic Development & Consumer Affairs

Hon. Michael Palma:
Co-Chair: Arts & Culture
Executive Committee
Housing/ Land Use & Zoning,
197A,
Manhattanville Rezoning Taskforce

Hon. Carmen Perez:
Co-Chair: Health Human Services & Environmental,
Executive Committee
197A,
Manhattanville Rezoning Taskforce

Hon. Norma Ramos, Esq.:
Piers & Waterfront/Economic Development & Consumer Affairs

Hon. Janet Ramon:
Uniformed Services & Transportation,
Youth/Education & Libraries

Hon. John T. Reddick:
Co-Chair: Landmarks/Preservation, Parks & Recreation
Executive Committee
197A,
Manhattanville Rezoning Taskforce

Hon. Jordi Reyes-Montblanc: Chairman of The Board
Executive Committee
Co-Chair: Manhattanville Rezoning Taskforce,
Housing/ Land Use & Zoning,
197A,
Uniformed Services & Transportation
Manhattan Borough Board
125th Street Business Improvement District Board

Hon. Walter South:
Vice Chair, 197A plan
Co-Chair, Housing, Land Use & Zoning
Executive Committee
Manhattanville Rezoning Taskforce,
Parks & Recreation/Landmarks & Preservation

Hon. Okpoti Sowah:
Youth/Education & Libraries

Hon. Brad W. Taylor:
Parks & Recreation/Landmarks & Preservation

Hon. Yvonne Stennett: Assistant Treasurer,
Executive Committee
Co-Chair, Housing/Land Use and Zoning,
197A,
Manhattanville Rezoning Taskforce

Hon. Rev. Georgiette Morgan-Thomas:
Senior Issues

Hon. Carolyn Thompson: Board 1st Vice-Chair,
Executive Committee
Co-Chair: Uniformed Services/Transportation
197A,
Manhattanville Rezoning Taskforce

Hon. Gladys Tinsley:
Health/Human Services & Environmental,
Landmarks/Preservation, Parks & Recreation

Hon. Linda L. Walton:
Harlem Piers/Economic Development & Consumer Affairs
Arts & Culture

Hon. Ernestine Welch:
Chair, Senior Issues,
Executive Committee
By-Laws,
Harlem Piers/Economic Development & Consumer Affairs,
Housing/Land Use & Zoning
197A,
Manhattanville Rezoning Taskforce

Hon. Anne Z. Whitman:
Housing Land Use & Zoning,
Manhattanville Rezoning Taskforce
Landmarks/Preservation, Parks & Recreation

Hon. Diane Wilson:
Housing Land Use & Zoning,
Manhattanville Rezoning Taskforce
Arts & Culture


O P E N I N G:
Landmarks/Preservation, Parks & Recreation


LIST OF PUBLIC MEMBERS BY COMMITTEE


197A Plan
Hamidullah Al-Amin
Nellie Bailey
Fred Danesh
Tom DeMott
Cynthia Doty
Ruth Eisenberg
Tom Kappner
Sarah Martin
Bill Starr

Arts & Culture
Lee Ann Pinder
Valerie Winborne
Margaret Porter Troupe
Quincy Troupe

Housing. Land Use & Zoning
Tom DeMott
Tom Kappner
Sheena Wright

Parks & Landmarks
Yuein Chin
Jeff Nulle
Sophie Johnson
Karen Gamble
Michael Henry Adams
Piers, Waterfront & Economic Development
Quincy Troupe

Seniors Issues
G. Marilyn Alexander
Laenoria Conyers
Sophie Johnson
William Hines, II
Ruther J. Miller
Valda Arbouin

Health & Human Services:
Joan Levine
Ruther J. Miller

Youth/Education & Libraries
Fatima Torres
Carol Barnes
Margaret Troupe



NB - For easy future access to the List, the Hyperlink is provided for bookmarking purposes for all members and others with online access to the posted List. http://cb9m.blogspot.com/2007/04/community-board-no-9-manhattan-list-of.html

Only the Executive Committee Members are assigned to the 197A - Michael Palma is not on the Executive Committee but is grandfathered into the 197A from when he was the co-chair of Harlem Piers.

The members of the Housing, Land Use & Zoning Committee are automatically also members of the Manhattanville Rezoning Task Force but are not members of the 197A, except Michael for the above reason.

The 197A and the Manhattanville Rezoning Task Force always meet jointly for regular monthly meetings.
The 197A working teams meet as needed and as called by the 197A chair.

Committee Public Members are appointed by The Board Chair at the request of Committee Chairs.
Public Members vote is taken in Committee only.

The General Public does no vote in Committees or in General Board, but in some instances, at the absolute discretion of the committee chair or The Board Chair, a General Public vote may be tabulated to show general community support or opposition on a particular issue.

The Manhattan Community Board 9 is a local government unit of the city of New York, encompassing the neighborhood of Hamilton Heights, Manhattanville, and Morningside Heights in the borough of Manhattan. It is delimited by Edgecombe Avenue, Bradhurst Avenue, Saint Nicholas Avenue, the 123rd street and Morningside Avenue/Manhattan Avenue on the east, Cathedral Parkway [110th Street] on the south, the Hudson River on the west and 155th street on the north.
Its current chairman is Jordi Reyes-Montblanc, and its district manager Lawrence McClean.

Demographics
As of 2000, the Community Board has a population of 111,724 up from 106,978 in 1990 and 103,037 in 1980.Of them (as of 2000), 19,837 (17.8%) are White non hispanic, 34,924 (31.3%) are African-American, 5,751 (5.1%) Asian or Pacific Islander, 272 (0.2%) American Indian or Native Alaskan, 398 (0.4%) of some other race, 2,309 (2.1%) of two or more race, 48,233 (43.2%) of Hispanic origins. 39.4% of the population benefit from public assistance as of 2004, up from 27.4% in 2000. The land area is 964.1 acres, or 1.51 square miles (3.90 km²).

External links
Profile of the Community Board

Cuban-style clinics may be a model for U.S.

Click here: Cuban-style clinics may be a model for U.S. - 03/12/2007 - MiamiHerald.com

MIAMI HERALD
Posted on Mon, Mar. 12, 2007

Cuban-style clinics may be a model for U.S.
By JOHN DORSCHNER
jdorschner@MiamiHerald.com

Related Content
Leon, CAC patients get Ritz-Carlton treatment
Humble clinic grows into $450M business
The clinics

At the new Leon Medical Center in Hialeah, a white-gloved and uniformed doorman welcomes seniors in front of bubbling waterfalls. Inside, along with marbled restrooms, seniors get free dental and vision care -- care that regular Medicare recipients must pay for themselves.

In Westchester, at a CAC Florida clinic, seniors are participating in free exercise classes, playing dominoes and competing in bingo tournaments, as well as getting free coffee and breakfast pastries.

In both places, everything is paid for by taxpayer dollars.

Most importantly, in these clinics and others like them, seniors get easy access to primary care physicians -- care intended to stop conditions from getting serious so that patients can avoid aggravating and expensive trips to the emergency room.

These clinics, which trace their roots to pre-Castro Cuba, could well be a vision of the future of healthcare in America. ''This is a very good model,'' says Steven Ullmann, a healthcare economist at the University of Miami.

Seniors tend to love the places. ''I feel good here,'' says Gerardo Gonzalez, 78, who went to the CAC clinic in Westchester one recent morning for a blood test and stayed to play dominoes. ``I feel at home.''

PLANS TO FRANCHISE

So far the clinics, true to their Cuban origins, have focused primarily on Hispanic areas, but that's changing. CAC plans to expand into Liberty City within the next year, and Benjamín León Jr., CEO and founder of Leon Medical Centers, says he's thinking of franchising his concept after getting inquiries from entrepreneurs in Arkansas, New Jersey and Puerto Rico.

Some experts argue that the clinics are good only because the Bush administration has put massive amounts of federal funding into the Medicare HMOs that these clinics depend on -- a push to shift a government program to for-profit corporations, on the theory that the private sector can do a better job managing money than can Washington bureaucrats.

''They've thrown a lot of money at this,'' says Robert Berenson, a healthcare specialist with the Urban Institute. It used to be a Medicare HMO received 95 percent of what a senior in a given area would be expected to cost each year. Now, it's 102 to 112 percent of expected traditional costs, says Berenson.
As Dartmouth researchers and others have shown, the average senior in Miami costs Medicare about twice as much per year as a senior in Minneapolis.

Because of that, the government reimburses HMOs in South Florida far more than most other places. An HMO in Miami-Dade gets $1,199 a month for each senior it signs up. In Broward, it's $1,026. In Minneapolis-St. Paul, an HMO gets $732 a month per member, according to a Medicare database provided by spokeswoman Sharon Fisher.

Over a year, that means a South Florida HMO gets up to an additional $5,600 to spend on each senior -- and that's why it can lavish extra benefits on them.

Not surprisingly, seniors love those benefits. Put that together with a strong Hispanic tradition of using clinics and it means almost half of Miami-Dade seniors -- 48 percent -- are in HMOs. In Broward, it's 43 percent. Both counties are more than double the national average of 19 percent.

This is such a lucrative field in South Florida that national players are getting involved. Humana has purchased the CAC clinics, and Goldman Sachs, the New York investment group, recently purchased a controlling interest in MCCI Medical Group, a local firm with clinics throughout South Florida, according to Bruce March, a Greenberg Traurig attorney who helped broker the deal.

ContinuCare, with healthcare entrepreneur Phillip Frost as its main investor, has 15 primary-care clinics in Miami-Dade and Broward serving a broad range of patients. Chief Executive Richard Pfenniger Jr. says that facilities in Hispanic areas will offer the coffee and ''social-related activities'' that the competition offers.

NATURALLY PROSPEROUS

Mike Fernandez, a Coral Gables entrepreneur who helped develop the CAC model, says that the Cuban-style clinics will prosper even without boosted funding from Washington because they're able to provide more value at lower cost. ``Historically, these clinics have provided way beyond what anyone else was offering.''

UM's Ullmann says the clinics prosper because of two keys: ``First, they're culturally sensitive, and second they have a focus on primary care.''

The clinics emphasize a ''warm and friendly'' atmosphere, says Fernandez, with service reps hovering to help patients negotiate the system. The CAC Westchester clinic even puts photos on the walls of patients' recent birthday parties, and service is extensive. Many clinics are open 7 a.m. to 5 p.m. weekdays and Saturday mornings.

Still, the core is primary care. Elders tend to have a lot of aches and pains, and a good many of them are worriers. ''They love to see their doctor,'' says Ausberto Bianchi, the physician-in-charge at CAC's Westchester center.

The clinics don't try to limit those visits. ''Why do that?'' asks León. ``If they can't see their doctor, they'll just go to the ER.''

Most clinics bring in specialists on certain days of the week, but the primary physician recommends a specialist only when he or she feels there's a particular need.

Barbara Starfield, a Johns Hopkins professor, says a key reason why Europeans tend to live longer than Americans but spend only half the healthcare dollars is that in most European countries, about half the doctors are devoted to primary care, while only a third are in America.

Primary physicians tend to do a better job treating basic ailments, her research found, at much lower cost.

The Dartmouth studies show specialists drive up costs. South Florida has 45 percent more specialists per 100,000 residents than does Minneapolis - and about 20 percent more than the national average. Specialists tend to bounce patients between each other -- the gastroenterologist sends someone with backache to an orthopedist -- at much higher per hour charges than primary care doctors charge. And each specialist is likely to conduct his own tests. The average senior with traditional Medicare in Miami gets about twice as many lab tests a year as a senior in Minneapolis.

LESS TIME IN THE E.R.

In the clinics, all test results are centralized with the primary doctor, and so there is virtually no repetition.

The clinics don't directly discourage trips to emergency rooms, but they do work hard to make it easier for patients to get quick care at the clinic. Leon has a 24-hour hotline that seniors can call to ask whether a condition is serious enough to warrant an ER trip. CAC Westchester has a walk-in urgent care center with long hours.

Leon's new facility in Hialeah even has a quasi-ER, where there are 10 beds separated by curtains. Benjamín León III insists this isn't meant to replace the ER, but offers a place for ailing seniors to lay down as they wait to see their doctor.

Some are suspicious about the clinics' motives, because they're for-profit companies trying to maximize returns, which can be done by keeping costs low.

SHOPPING AROUND

Ullmann of UM doesn't think that should deter patients. If one clinic doesn't treat them well, they can switch to another -- just like most American consumers do in other matters. ``You're looking for value at a good cost. Why is that any different than picking a Dell or a Gateway?''

Ironically, a critic of the for-profit HMOs is a conservative, Michael F. Cannon, a scholar with the Cato Institute and author of Healthy Competition.

Cannon points out that with the HMO, the customer still can't control his healthcare dollars and, like many liberals, he wonders whether the Medicare HMOs are ''cherry-picking'' their customers.

That's against federal law, but there are subtle ways to do it, and Cannon wonders if CAC's wellness programs -- offering daily exercise classes -- attract the most active and healthiest seniors, while the sickest tend to stay with traditional care, so they can see the specialists and get the customized treatment they feel they need.
''This is called screening,'' he says.

In fact, CAC's social and wellness programs are the one major difference between it and Leon.

BODY, MIND AND SPIRIT

CAC provides many daily social events, including English classes, and those who do the morning exercises are rewarded with a free lunch. CAC execs say exercise classes keep seniors fit -- and means they're less likely to need expensive trips to ERs.

''But there's also the mental health aspect,'' says Hilda Lago, a CAC administrator. The senior sitting at home, often alone, has time to dwell on aches and pains, while going to a center to be with others can brighten a day.

''Every day I come here,'' says Emma Rodriguez, 75, a regular at a CAC exercise class. ``That's better for me.''

León Jr. says his clinics offer no exercise or
dominoes -- and never will. ``We take the dollars and put them into healthcare.''

When Fernandez, a creator of the CAC dominoes-bingo style, heard that comment, he thought of the Leon clinics elaborate entrances and responded: ``Well, healthcare -- and waterfalls.''
Leon says Congressmen from around the country have visited his centers, wondering if they can serve as a national model.

UM's Ullmann doesn't see why not. ''If they put one in Chinatown in San Francisco, they'd have to be sensitive to different cultural needs, but the basic model'' -- personal attention and strong primary care -- ``would work just as well.''

Wednesday, March 07, 2007

English, Irish, Scots: They’re All One, Genes Suggest SPAIN!!!


Science


English, Irish, Scots: They’re All One, Genes Suggest
By NICHOLAS WADE
Published: March 5, 2007


Britain and Ireland are so thoroughly divided in their histories that there is no single word to refer to the inhabitants of both islands. Historians teach that they are mostly descended from different peoples: the Irish from the Celts, and the English from the Anglo-Saxons who invaded from northern Europe and drove the Celts to the country’s western and northern fringes.


But geneticists who have tested DNA throughout the British Isles are edging toward a different conclusion. Many are struck by the overall genetic similarities, leading some to claim that both Britain and Ireland have been inhabited for thousands of years by a single people that have remained in the majority, with only minor additions from later invaders like Celts, Romans, Angles , Saxons, Vikings and Normans.


The implication that the Irish, English, Scottish and Welsh have a great deal in common with each other, at least from the geneticist’s point of view, seems likely to please no one.
The genetic evidence is still under development, however, and because only very rough dates can be derived from it, it is hard to weave evidence from DNA, archaeology, history and linguistics into a coherent picture of British and Irish origins.


That has not stopped the attempt. Stephen Oppenheimer, a medical geneticist at the University of Oxford, says the historians’ account is wrong in almost every detail. In Dr. Oppenheimer’s reconstruction of events, the principal ancestors of today’s British and Irish populations arrived from Spain about 16,000 years ago, speaking a language related to Basque.


The British Isles were unpopulated then, wiped clean of people by glaciers that had smothered northern Europe for about 4,000 years and forced the former inhabitants into southern refuges in Spain and Italy. When the climate warmed and the glaciers retreated, people moved back north.


The new arrivals in the British Isles would have found an empty territory, which they could have reached just by walking along the Atlantic coastline, since there were still land bridges then across what are now English Channel and the Irish Sea.


This new population, who lived by hunting and gathering, survived a sharp cold spell called the Younger Dryas that lasted from 12,300 to 11,000 years ago. Much later, some 6,000 years ago, agriculture finally reached the British Isles from its birthplace in the Near East.


Agriculture may have been introduced by people speaking Celtic, in Dr. Oppenheimer’s view. Although the Celtic immigrants may have been few in number, they spread their farming techniques and their language throughout Ireland and the western coast of Britain. Later immigrants arrived from northern Europe had more influence on the eastern and southern coasts. They too spread their language, a branch of German, but these invaders’ numbers were also small compared with the local population.


In all, about three-quarters of the ancestors of today’s British and Irish populations arrived between 15,000 and 7,500 years ago, when rising sea levels finally divided Britain and Ireland from the Continent and from one another, Dr. Oppenheimer calculates in a new book, “The Origins of the British: A Genetic Detective Story” (Carroll & Graf, 2006).


As for subsequent invaders, Ireland received the fewest; the invaders’ DNA makes up about 12 percent of the Irish gene pool, Dr. Oppenheimer estimates, but it accounts for 20 percent of the gene pool in Wales, 30 percent in Scotland, and about one-third in eastern and southern England.


Still, no single group of invaders is responsible for more than 5 percent of the current gene pool, Dr. Oppenheimer says on the basis of genetic data.


He cites figures from the archaeologist Heinrich Haerke that the Anglo-Saxon invasions that began in the fourth century A.D. added about 250,000 people to a British population of one to two million, an estimate Dr. Oppenheimer notes is larger than his but considerably less than the substantial replacement of the English population assumed by others. The Norman invasion of 1066 A.D. brought not many more than 10,000 people, according to Dr. Haerke.


Other geneticists say Dr. Oppenheimer’s reconstruction is plausible, though some disagree with details. Several said that genetic methods did not give precise enough dates to be confident of certain aspects, like when the first settlers arrived.


“Once you have an established population, it is quite difficult to change it very radically,” said Daniel G. Bradley, a geneticist at Trinity College, Dublin. But he said he was “quite agnostic” as to whether the original population became established in Britain and Ireland immediately after the glaciers retreated 16,000 years ago, as Dr. Oppenheimer argues, or more recently, in the Neolithic Age, which began 10,000 years ago.


Bryan Sykes, another Oxford geneticist, said he agreed with Dr. Oppenheimer that the ancestors of “by far the majority of people” were present in the British Isles before the Roman conquest of A.D. 43. “The Saxons, Vikings and Normans had a minor effect, and much less than some of the medieval historical texts would indicate,” he said.


His conclusions, based on his own genetic survey and information in his genealogical testing service, Oxford Ancestors, are reported in his new book, “Saxons, Vikings and Celts: The Genetic Roots of Britain and Ireland.”


A different view of the Anglo-Saxon invasions has been developed by Mark Thomas of University College, London. Dr. Thomas and colleagues say the invaders wiped out substantial numbers of the indigenous population, replacing 50 percent to 100 percent of those in central England.


Their argument is that the Y chromosomes of English men seem identical to those of people in Norway and the Friesland area of the Netherlands, two regions from which the invaders may have originated.


Dr. Oppenheimer disputes this, saying the similarity between the English and northern European Y chromosomes arises because both regions were repopulated by people from the Iberian refuges after the glaciers retreated.


Dr. Sykes said he agreed with Dr. Oppenheimer on this point, but another geneticist, Christopher Tyler-Smith of the Sanger Centre near Cambridge, said the jury was still out. “There is not yet a consensus view among geneticists, so the genetic story may well change,” he said. As to the identity of the first postglacial settlers, Dr. Tyler-Smith said he “would favor a Neolithic origin for the Y chromosomes, although the evidence is still quite sketchy.”


Dr. Oppenheimer’s population history of the British Isles relies not only on genetic data but also on the dating of language changes by methods developed by geneticists. These are not generally accepted by historical linguists, who long ago developed but largely rejected a dating method known as glottochronology.


Geneticists have recently plunged into the field, arguing that linguists have been too pessimistic and that advanced statistical methods developed for dating genes can also be applied to languages.


Dr. Oppenheimer has relied on work by Peter Forster, a geneticist at Anglia Ruskin University, to argue that Celtic is a much more ancient language than supposed, and that Celtic speakers could have brought knowledge of agriculture to Ireland, where it first appeared. He also adopts Dr. Forster’s argument, based on a statistical analysis of vocabulary, that English is an ancient, fourth branch of the Germanic language tree, and was spoken in England before the Roman invasion.


English is usually assumed to have developed in England, from the language of the Angles and Saxons, about 1,500 years ago. But Dr. Forster argues that the Angles and the Saxons were both really Viking peoples who began raiding Britain ahead of the accepted historical schedule. They did not bring their language to England because English, in his view, was already spoken there, probably introduced before the arrival of the Romans by tribes such as the Belgae, whom Julius Caesar describes as being present on both sides of the Channel.


The Belgae may have introduced some socially transforming technique, such as iron-working, which would lead to their language supplanting that of the indigenous inhabitants, but Dr. Forster said he had not yet identified any specific innovation from the archaeological record.
Germanic is usually assumed to have split into three branches: West Germanic, which includes German and Dutch; East Germanic, the language of the Goths and Vandals; and North Germanic, consisting of the Scandinavian languages. Dr. Forster’s analysis shows English is not an off-shoot of West Germanic, as usually assumed, but is a branch independent of the other three, which also implies a greater antiquity. Germanic split into its four branches some 2,000 to 6,000 years ago, Dr. Forster estimates.


Historians have usually assumed that Celtic was spoken throughout Britain when the Romans arrived. But Dr. Oppenheimer argues that the absence of Celtic place names in England — words for places are particularly durable — makes this unlikely.


If the people of the British Isles hold most of their genetic heritage in common, with their differences consisting only of a regional flavoring of Celtic in the west and of northern European in the east, might that perception draw them together? Geneticists see little prospect that their findings will reduce cultural and political differences.


The Celtic cultural myth “is very entrenched and has a lot to do with the Scottish, Welsh and Irish identity; their main identifying feature is that they are not English,” said Dr. Sykes, an Englishman who has traced his Y chromosome and surname to an ancestor who lived in the village of Flockton in Yorkshire in 1286.


Dr. Oppenheimer said genes “have no bearing on cultural history.” There is no significant genetic difference between the people of Northern Ireland, yet they have been fighting with each other for 400 years, he said.


As for his thesis that the British and Irish are genetically much alike, “It would be wonderful if it improved relations, but I somehow think it won’t.”

Monday, March 05, 2007

Legal Documents - Federal Eminent Domain Lawsuit / Position Papers / News Articles and Commentary

Date: Mon, 5 Mar 2007 06:17:07 -0800 (PST)
From: "Anne Z. Whitman"
Subject: Fwd: The Figures Lie and Liars Figure/ CU plan would reap windfall profit at taxpayer expense in WEST HARLEM
To: "Jordi Reyes Montblanc"


more info: The figures lie and the liars figure

CU pays ESDC 300k for eminent domain agreement, CU deliberatey boards up and stockpiles properties made vacant by CU, CU pays AKRF to write report finding blight(blight definition in NYC applies to CU property however) CU pays DCP to write negative response to CB9 197A plan which has unanimous community endorsement and UNITES community

CU agression on a minority community causing stress, spike in domestic violence, massive displacement already occurring at 3333 Broadway, former Mithcell Lama property

The bottom line is this..the figures lie and the liars figure. This is a plan/scheme that threatens and injures a vibrant and diverse community for a private instituion (CU)
that would reap windfall profit at taxpayer expense. How much gov't $$ has already been spent accommodating powerful, politically connected party? This is a misuse of government power and amounts to nothing more than a pack of lies to benefit a private party at taxpayer expense.


Note: forwarded message attached.


Anne Z. Whitman, President
Hudson North American
3229 Broadway, New York, New York 10027

Legal Documents

October 2006




Attorneys for Plaintiffs:

Matthew Brinckerhoff: 212-763-5020

Jennifer Levy: 718-246-3274

Jeffrey Baker: 518-438-9907 ext 227


Plaintiffs:

DANIEL GOLDSTEIN, JERRY CAMPBELL, as the putative administrator of the estate ofOLIVER ST. CLAIR STEWART and in his individual capacity, THE GELIN GROUP, LLC,CHADDERTON’S BAR AND GRILL INC., d/b/a FREDDY’S BAR AND BACKROOM,MARIA GONZALEZ, JACKIE GONZALEZ, YESENIA GONZALEZ, HUDA MUFLEH-ODEH,JAN AKHTAR, DAVID SHEETS, JOSEPH PASTORE, PETER WILLIAMS,PETER WILLIAMS ENTERPRISES, INC., HENRY WEINSTEIN, 535 CARLETON AVE. REALTY CORP.,535 CARLTON AVE. REALTY CORP., and PACIFIC CARLTON DEVELOPMENT CORP.,

against

Defendants:GEORGE E. PATAKI, CHARLES A. GARGANO, NEW YORK STATE URBANDEVELOPMENT CORPORATION d/b/a EMPIRE STATE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, BRUCE C. RATNER, JAMES P. STUCKEY, FOREST CITY ENTERPRISES, INC.,FOREST CITY RATNER COMPANY, RATNER GROUP, INC., BR FCRC, LLC, BR LAND, LLC FCR LAND, LLC, BROOKLYN ARENA, LLC, ATLANTIC YARDS DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC,MICHAEL BLOOMBERG, DANIEL DOCTOROFF, ANDREW M. ALPER, JOSHUA SIREFMAN,CITY OF NEW YORK and NEW YORK CITY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION,


February 22 - June 23, 2005 [pdf and html]

Writ of Certiorari – [pdf and html]
Stevens Majority Opinion – [pdf and html
]Kennedy Concurrence – [pdf and html]
O'Connor Dissent – [pdf and html]
Thomas Dissent – [pdf and html]

December 2004 [pdf]



********************************



March 18, 2004

Ron Shiffman
Ron Shiffman is professor, Graduate Center for Planning and the Environment at the Pratt Institute, director emeritus of the Pratt Institute Center for Community and Environmental Development, and from 1990-96 a commissioner on the New York City Planning Commission. July 12 , 2006

Boerum Hill Association [pdf]February 10, 2004

Brooklyn Heights Association [pdf] - BHA WebsiteDecember 22, 2005
The largest grassroots environmental organization in the U.S. with over 750,000 members, 14,000 of whom live in New York City, has taken a position against Bruce Ratner's proposed project for Atlantic Avenue.June, 2004


********************************

http://dddb.net/php/reading/news.php
News Articles and Commentary

2007
Yards Ball Now In Judge's Court Brooklyn Downtown Star. Nik Kovac. February 15.

By Mindy Thompson Fullilove, MD. A Report Issued by the Castle Coalition. February 14.

NY Sun. Joseph Goldstein. February 8.


Metro NY. Patrick Arden. February 8.

amNewYork. Michael Clancy. February 8.


The Brooklyn Papers. December 30, 2006

NY Times. By Nicholas Confessore. December 22, 2006

NY Times. By Nicholas Confessore. December 21, 2006

The NY Sun. By Nicole Gelinas. December 19, 2006

The NY Sun. Editorial. December 18, 2006

Atlantic Yards Report. By Norman Oder. December 18, 2006

Atlantic Yards Report. By Norman Oder. December 18, 2006

NY Times. By Nicholas Confessore. December 14, 2006

Atlantic Yards Report. By Norman Oder. December 13, 2006

The Real Estate. By Matthew Schuerman. November 16, 2006

No Land Grab. By Norman Oder. November 16, 2006

Atlantic Yards Report. By Norman Oder. November 15, 2006

Atlantic Yards Report. By Norman Oder. November 15, 2006

Atlantic Yards Report. By Norman Oder. November 15, 2006

Atlantic Yards Report. By Norman Oder. November 15, 2006

The postage-stamp "absurdity" of AY's "Main Lawn"
Atlantic Yards Report. By Norman Oder. November 13, 2006

Your World With Neil Cavuto. November 12, 2006

New York Times. By Nicholas Confessore. November 12, 2006

Daily News. By Michael O'Keeffe. November 12, 2006

Brooklyn Papers. By Ariella Cohen. November 11, 2006

Brooklyn Papers. By Samuel Goldsmith. November 11, 2006

Salon.com . By King Kaufman. November 9, 2006

Castle Coalition. November 8, 2006

Atlantic Yards Report. By Norman Oder. November 7, 2006

Brooklyn Views. By Jonathan Cohn. November 5, 2006

The Downtown Brooklyn Star. By Norman Oder. November 2, 2006

Atlantic Yards Report. By Norman Oder. November 1, 2006

NY Metro. OpEd. By Norman Oder. October 30, 2006

Attorney for project foes says developer-driven Brooklyn plan is unconstitutional
NY Metro. October 30, 2006

Atlantic Yards Report. October 27, 2006

New York Law Journal. October 27, 2006

NY Sun. October 27, 2006

Commercial Property News. October 27, 2006

Crain's New York Business. October 27, 2006

Associated Press via NY Newsday. October 27, 2006
NY Metro. October 27, 2006

NY Daily News. October 27, 2006

NY Times. October 27, 2006

NY Post. October 27, 2006

NY Observer. By Matthew Schuerman. September 11, 2006

THE 6%-8% SOLUTION? - The SLATIN REPORT. BY Steve Garmhausen. September 6, 2006

RATZILLA ATTACKS BROOKLYN
Mr. Ratner's Neighborhood:Manipulative developers, shrill protesters, and a sixteen-tower glass-and-steel monster marching inexorably forward. What the battle for the soul of Brooklyn looks like—from right next door.- New York Magazine. By Chris Smith. August 14, 2006

Ratner renter revolt Holdout tenants prep Yards suit-The Brooklyn Papers. August 5, 2006

Flawed from the get-go-Editorial The Brooklyn Papers. August 5, 2006

Spitzer: Let’s weigh Yards pros, cons-The Brooklyn Papers. August 5, 2006

A tale of three community boards -Web Exclusive The Brooklyn Papers. August 4, 2006



Life in the Footprint:Voices of the fading community in the shadow of the Atlantic Yards
-The Village Voice. By Cynthia Carr. August 1, 2006

Blight, Like Beauty, Can Be in the Eye of the Beholder -The New York Times. July 25, 2006 July 22, 2006 - Brooklyn Papers




Atlantic yards report released- AM New York. July 19, 2006

Living in the shadow-Metro NY. July 19, 2006


In Push for Atlantic Yards Project, State Touts Eminent Domain -The New York Sun. July 19, 2006July 15, 2006 - Brooklyn Papers

On the cheap Throngs seek out Bruce’s low-rent Yards apartments


Bard of Brooklyn savages Gehry's 'wedding dress' blocksThe Guardian. by Paul Arendt. June 27, 2006


Yassky bill would push $3M to Ratner crony- The Brooklyn Papers. June 17, 2006


MAS presentation on design principles, brochure now online - The Atlantic Yards Report. June 22, 2006

No Mas Skyscrapers, Says MAS - The Brooklyn Downtown Star. June 22, 2006Brooklyn's Trojan Horse: What's wrong with the buildings Frank Gehry wants to put in my neighborhood?By Jonathan Lethem. Slate.com. June 19, 2006

Atlantic Yards Can't Work - The Brooklyn Papers. June 17, 2006

How Big is Atlantic Yards? - NoLandGrab.org. June 16, 2006


Atlantic Yards Project Violates Principles of Urban Planning - WNYC, NY Public Radio. By Andrea Bernstein. June 16, 2006

Group Calls for Major Changes in Atlantic Yards Plan - The New York Times. June 16, 2006

by Daniel Goldstein. May 2006. Our River, Our Streets. (A publication from the Federation to Preserve the Greenwich Village Waterfront & Great Port)

It's The Scale, Stupid - Brooklyn Views Blog. May 21, 2006

Developer Defends Atlantic Yards Plan for Brooklyn - The New York Times. May 12, 2006

Unimpressed With Gehry’s New Take on Arena - The New York Sun. May 12, 2006

by Jess Wisloski, Oct. 2005. Published, May 2006. Dead Stories Critic Morrone: urban quality of Brooklyn at stake - Atlantic Yards Report. 3/26/06The $6 billion lie: why Ratner's fiscal claim is Swiss cheese - Atlantic Yards Report. 3/28/06

Watching the Takers - New York Sun Editorial. 3/24/06

The Brooklyn Paper. By Ariella Cohen. November 12, 2005

A Call for Narrative - The Brooklyn Rail. by Brian J. Carreira, November 2005


Developer Has Mixed Record in Brooklyn - Andrea Bernstein. WNYC. 9/13/05

Bruce Ratner: Powerman, the Eroica, and Atlantic Yards - The Brooklyn Rail. by Brian J. Carreira, September 2005

The Brooklyn Rail. by Brian J. Carreira, July 2005 THE RETURN OF METROTECH: How to ensure the sequels to Brooklyn's back-office complex will share prosperity with the neighborhoods next door. Matthew Schuerman. CityLimits.org. 02/05





2004
Eminent Domain: Being Abused? - 60 Minutes. 07/04/04

Arena foes smell a Ratner - Mike Lupica. NY Daily News. 6/26/04"A huge real-estate deal, riding into Brooklyn behind a Jason Kidd-led fast break, right through neighborhoods we are supposed to hand over to a developer like Ratner."




A New Growth War - Julia Vitullo-Martin. New York Post. 5/24/04

Letter to Ratner - Johannah Rodgers. May, 2004 The Brooklyn Rail






On Dean St., Ratner a rat - Mike Lupica. NY Daily News. 1/26/04




2003
Should We the People Ever Build a Stadium for these Millionaire Owners ESPN2 "Writer's Bloc," ESPN.com. 12/30/03

Saturday, March 03, 2007

Will green roofs be the next hot trend?



Will green roofs be the next hot trend?
By Cliff Bowden • Bankrate.com


If the term "green roof" evokes an image of a few potted plants arranged tastefully on the top of a building, then the time seems ripe to rethink that definition. Green roofs may be the next hot trend to cool down the urban landscape and lower the cost of controlling temperatures in the average suburban home.

Green roofs are generally categorized by one of two forms. Extensive green roofs, also known as eco-roofs or low-profile roofs, are made with a few thin layers of soil, are lightweight, relatively less expensive, and require very little maintenance. Extensive green roofs are the correct choice, the experts say, when the primary desire is for an ecological cover with limited human access.

Intensive or high-profile green roofs, on the other hand, look like traditional roof gardens because a much wider variety of plant material is usually included. They have soil depths ranging from 8 to 12 inches, with growth that can extend upward of 15 feet. They can include such architectural features as waterfalls, ponds and gazebos. Their construction and maintenance is much more costly.

Green roofs

A feeling of home
When Focus Development planned the Church Street Station Condominiums near Northwestern University in Chicago, a garden roof where unit owners could get away from the hustle and bustle of daily life was part of plans to create a place buyers would call home. To make it, Chicago's American Hydrotech used what it calls time-tested components so that the garden would bloom and flourish season after season.Photo courtesy American Hydrotech, Inc.

Green roofs
Living data center

The Living Roof on Hamerschag Hall at Carnegie Mellon University was designed for ongoing research on the benefits of storm-water management and energy conservation for buildings housing classrooms, labs and administrative offices. A ''datalogger'' is positioned in an office within the building for ease in downloading figures on such variables as thermal fluctuations and the amount and positioning of water runoff.Photo courtesy G.R.E.E.N. research co-operative, Southern Illinois University Edwardsville

SLIDESHOW:
1 8





New to the U.S.Tristan Roberts, an executive with BuildingGreen in Brattleboro, Vt., says that while interest in green roofs within the U.S. has only taken root in the past decade, green roofs as a phenomenon have a long history.

"They go back for hundreds, if not thousands, of years," he says, "as sod houses in this country and as living roofs in Europe. The modern equivalent has been around for quite a few decades and is much more prevalent in Europe, particularly Germany."

BuildingGreen, which bills itself as an independent operation dedicated to distributing information to building-industry professionals and policymakers, sees green roofs as one way to improve the environmental performance and reduce the adverse impacts of traditional buildings.

Bill Retzlaff, chair of biological sciences at Southern Illinois University-Edwardsville and coordinator of the research cooperative Green Roof Environmental Evaluation Network, or G.R.E.E.N., says the green-roof industry in the U.S. is very new. "While Europeans have been doing them for a long time, our climate is different, so there's not much useful data on their performance here."

The G.R.E.E.N. cooperative was established two years ago to evaluate green-roof technology in the Midwest, says Retzlaff. In addition to the university, members include several commercial suppliers and Greenroofs.com, an international resource and online information portal for the green-roof industry.

"Our longest-running project has been on the ground since September 2005," says Retzlaff. "We now have seven specific green-roof projects at our field site. We're evaluating storm-water runoff and temperatures, comparing those results with the results we get with a flat membrane roof."

While green roofs don't necessarily require a lot of care, it's a misconception to suppose that they will just take care of themselves. G.R.E.E.N. researchers are working with systems that don't require a lot of maintenance, but there's no such thing as a no-maintenance green roof.
"You must water them for the first 10 weeks or so," Retzlaff says. "They have to get established, just like any other garden. And at minimum, you need to add some plants, fertilize and weed a couple of times a year."

Before establishing a green roof, consumers need to have some sense of what they want from it beyond the vague notion that they're good for the environment.

"Everything from roof materials to plant varieties has to be picked for the issue you want to address -- storm-water retention, more green space or thermal control," says Retzlaff. "Every green roof provides some of each of these things, but to decide you want a green roof because it's a good thing is not enough."

Benefits of lofty gardensFor example, Retzlaff cites a green roof in St. Louis on the seventh floor of a children's hospital that has a pond and large walkways.

"It costs $200,000 a year to maintain," he says. "But the benefit is that when those children go through those double-glass doors leading to the green roof, they can forget everything inside."
Retzlaff says Ford Motor Co. has a 10-acre extensive green roof in Dearborn, Mich., that remains the largest in the U.S. "It has a 2-inch depth, so they have to irrigate it. They catch storm water in retention ponds and irrigate with that."

In Chicago, the mayor is interested in lowering the urban center's heat-island effects that drive up temperatures. "He has been told by various research facilities that if about 65 percent of downtown buildings had green roofs, that would lower the heat by about 10 degrees," says Retzlaff. "So the city issues grants to offset the costs of installation and will fast-track building permits if a green roof is included."

Retzlaff expects G.R.E.E.N. to become a resource for would-be green-roofers around the country. "Eventually people will be able to contact us to find out exactly what growing medium and plants are best for their climate and purpose."

BuildingGreen's Roberts says he sees more incentives -- and so more green roofs -- for commercial buildings than homes right now, but there are several benefits that could make them appealing to homeowners. They include increased insulation and the fact that the additional garden materials make a roof more durable.

"For homeowners, a green roof on a low slope or flat roof can extend the life of that roof many years by shielding it from rain water and ultraviolet sun rays, which degrade roofing materials," says Roberts.

Green roofs also filter out some air pollutants, he adds.

Green roof solutionsIn addition to collecting storm water, reducing urban heat and acting as insulation to cool down a building or home's occupants, green roofs are seen by advocates as opportunities to increase food production, beautify cities and provide sound insulation by absorbing, reflecting or deflecting noise by machinery, planes and traffic.

For the average homeowner concerned with rising energy costs, it's likely the insulation qualities of green roofs would prove most appealing.

Dennis Yanez, national marketing manager for Chicago's American Hydrotech, says his company offers waterproofing and all the components for garden-roof assembly, including Styrofoam, soil and plants. American Hydrotech also offers a single-source warranty, which Yanez says is unique in the industry. Clients are primarily architects and developers.

"We have not done a lot in the consumer market," Yanez says. "We do have some homes that have our systems in them, but they're all higher-end, in the 7,000- to 10,000-square-foot range."

That's because a homeowner who wants a green roof, Yanez says, would have to start by hiring an engineer or architect to design it. He estimates the price of building a green roof from "the high teens to the low $20s" per square foot.

Greenroofs.com estimates costs at $9 to $25 per square foot for extensive green roofs and $25 to $40 or more for the intensive variety.

"We've seen they have a growing appeal," Yanez says. "In general, sustainability and green building has taken off in the past five or six years. Putting together buildings that disrupt the environment as little as possible is becoming a real concern."

Bankrate.com's corrections policy
-- Posted: Feb. 15, 2007

Friday, March 02, 2007

City Council Calendar for Monday, March 5, 2007 - Sunday, March 11, 2007

Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2007 18:23:22 -0500 (EST)
From: "NYC Council Legislative Update" Add to Address Book Add Mobile Alert
To: reysmont@yahoo.com
Subject: City Council Calendar for Monday, March 5, 2007 - Sunday, March 11, 2007

City Council Calendar for Monday, March 5, 2007 - Sunday, March 11, 2007


- - - Recent Council Legislation - - - -

On Wednesday, February 28th the City Council passed a number of pieces of
legislation that impact a wide spectrum of issues affecting New Yorkers. This
included a package of bills to make nightlife safer in New York City through:
- Enabling the City to shut down businesses selling or making fake ID's;
- Requiring the installation of security cameras at club entrances and exits;
and
- Establishing an independent monitoring program for clubs with serious or
repeat violations.

Additionally, the Council passed bills to:
- License and regulate pedicabs;
- Require tax preparation companies to provide clients with a customer bill of
rights;
- Approve a budget modification to recognize $2.2 billion more in City
revenues; and
- Extend the life of the Wetlands Task Force.

Finally, the Council passed resolutions to:
- Call upon the State Legislature and State Liquor Authority to modify the use
of bottle services in nightlife establishments; and
- Call for a symbolic moratorium on use of the 'N' word in New York City.

For more, see the City Council Home page at http://www.nyccouncil.info

Contact Council Speaker Quinn at:
http://www.nyccouncil.info/rightnow/contactspkr.cfm


- - - - - Legislative Calendar - - - - -

** Meetings for Monday, March 5, 2007 **

Committee(s) on: Education
1:30 PM, Council Chambers - City Hall
Oversight - Empowerment Schools:What Have We Learned So Far?
Proposed Res 267-A - Resolution calling upon the Department of Education to
assess the impact of its decision to decrease milk choices in New York City's
public schools in order to evaluate the effect of this policy change on children's
milk consumption and nutrition.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

** Meetings for Tuesday, March 6, 2007 **

Subcommittee(s) on: Zoning & Franchises
9:30 AM, Committee Room - City Hall
Details: See Land Use Calendar Available Thursday, March 1, 2007 in Room 5 City
Hall

Committee(s) on: Finance
Time: 10:00 AM
Location: Council Chambers - City Hall

New York City Council Fiscal Year 2008 Preliminary Budget, Mayor's FY '07
Preliminary Management Report and Agency Oversight Hearings
10:00 a.m. - Testimony of City Agencies and officials
3:00 p.m. - Public

Subcommittee(s) on: Landmarks, Public Siting & Maritime Uses
11:00 AM, Committee Room - City Hall
Details: See Land Use Calendar Available Thursday, March 1, 2007 in Room 5
City Hall

Committee(s) on: Housing & Buildings
1:00 PM, Committee Room - City Hall

New York City Council Fiscal Year 2008 Preliminary Budget, Mayor's FY '07
Preliminary Management Report and Agency Oversight Hearings
1:00 p.m. - 4:30 p.m. Testimony of City Agencies and officials
4:30 p.m. - Public

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

** Meetings for Wednesday, March 7, 2007 **

Committee(s) on: Governmental Operations
10:00 AM, Council Chambers - City Hall

New York City Council Fiscal Year 2008 Preliminary Budget, Mayor's FY '07
Preliminary Management Report and Agency Oversight Hearings
10:00 a.m. - 3:15 p.m. - Testimony of City Agencies and officials
3:15 p.m. - Public


Committee(s) on: Economic Development
10:00 AM, Committee Room - City Hall
Details: New York City Council Fiscal Year 2008 Preliminary Budget, Mayor's
FY '07 Preliminary Management Report and Agency Oversight Hearings

10:00 a.m. - 12:30 p.m. Testimony of City Agencies and officials
12:30 p.m. - Public

Subcommittee(s) on: Planning, Dispositions & Concessions
10:00 AM, 250 Broadway, 16th Floor
Details: See Land Use Calendar Available Thursday, March 1, 2007 in Room 5 City
Hall

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

** Meetings for Thursday, March 8, 2007 **

Committee(s) on: Oversight and Investigations
Time: 10:00 AM, Council Chambers - City Hall

New York City Council Fiscal Year 2008 Preliminary Budget, Mayor's FY '07
Preliminary Management Report and Agency Oversight Hearings
10:00 a.m. - 10:45 p.m. Testimony of City Agencies and officials
10:45 p.m. - Public

Committee(s) on: Land Use
10:00 AM, Committee Room - City Hall
Details: All items reported out of the subcommittees AND SUCH OTHER BUSINESS
AS MAY BE NECESSARY

Committee(s) on: Land Use
11:00 AM, Committee Room - City Hall
Details: New York City Council Fiscal Year 2008 Preliminary Budget, Mayor's FY
'07 Preliminary Management Report and Agency Oversight Hearings

11:00 a.m. - 2:00 p.m. Testimony of City Agencies and officials
2:00 p.m. - Public

Committee(s) on: Youth Services
11:30 AM, Council Chambers - City Hall
Chairperson(s): Lewis A. Fidler
Details: New York City Council Fiscal Year 2008 Preliminary Budget, Mayor's
FY '07 Preliminary Management Report and Agency Oversight Hearings
11:30 a.m. - Department of Youth and Community Development
12:30 p.m. - Public

Committee(s) on: Sanitation & Solid Waste Management
2:00 PM, Council Chambers - City Hall
Details: New York City Council Fiscal Year 2008 Preliminary Budget, Mayor's FY
'07 Preliminary Management Report and Agency Oversight Hearings
2:00 p.m. - Department of Sanitation
4:00 p.m. - Public
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

** Meetings for Friday, March 9, 2007 **

Committee(s) on: Transportation
10:00 AM, Committee Room - City Hall
Details: New York City Council Fiscal Year 2008 Preliminary Budget, Mayor's FY
'07 Preliminary Management Report and Agency Oversight Hearings

10:00 a.m. - 1:15 p.m. Testimony of City Agencies and officials
1:15 p.m. - Public

Joint Meeting. Committee(s) on: Public Safety; Civil Rights

10:00 AM, Council Chambers - City Hall
Details: Oversight - Internal and External Monitoring of the NYPD

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

** Meetings for Saturday, March 10, 2007 **

-- no public meetings scheduled --

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

** Meetings for Sunday, March 11, 2007 **

-- no public meetings scheduled --


More information at http://www.nyccouncil.info/rightnow/calendarpage.cfm



This is the City Council news you requested for: Council Legislative Calendar
Email Updates

Note: The City Council list serve is now being powered by NYC.gov

To subscribe, please go to this link:
https://www.nyc.gov/portal/signin.jsp

Comment on this news service:
http://www.nyc.gov/html/misc/html/council_news_feedback.html

PLEASE DO NOT REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE!

Thursday, March 01, 2007

Electric Transformers to Displace Books

the Campus
Home > News


Electric Transformers to Displace Books
Collections on first floor of Cohen may be "tossed"
Rodolfo Leyton and Lydia Shestopalova
Issue date: 1/29/07 Section: News

Media Credit: Sergey Kadinsky

This reading haven may be no more.

Media Credit: Sergey Kadinsky

These books are older than the campus.

Soon students may really want to stay out of the "basement" of the Cohen Library. The latest plans for the development of the South Campus science complex feature six electric transformers occupying the first floor of the Morris R. Cohen Library, which is currently home to electronic classrooms, study carrels and an enviable collection of non-science journals.
The purpose of the transformer station is to increase electrical power to South Campus. Because power mains are located along Amsterdam Avenue, a midway station is necessary to channel the electricity between the North Campus and the South Campus.
Originally, the station was to be placed in the area outside of the North Academic Center, which currently serves as the campus parking lot. However, plans were changed, and the transformers are now slated to be placed inside the Cohen Library, which is located inside the NAC, the school's main academic and social space. According to the latest plans released, the transformer facility will occupy 16,700 sq. ft. of the 20,722 sq. ft footprint of the library.
Clearing the first floor for the transformers entails removing the books, periodicals, and other materials currently housed there. Chief Operating Officer and Senior Vice President Lois Cronholm, who developed the plan, proposed the installation of compact shelving to distribute the displaced library collection onto the other floors. Some consider the plan unreasonable, citing the high cost of the system and the additional need to reinforce all the floors of the library to handle the added weight. According to faculty at the library, given the high cost of relocation, the collections currently housed on the first floor will simply be "tossed out."
Dr. Cronholm, President Gregory Williams, and Provost Zeev Dagan were all unresponsive to inquiries on this matter.